DCT
2:10-cv-09099
California Institute Of Technology v. STMicroelectronics NV
General
Filed
11/24/10
Cause of ActionPatent Infringement
SectorCommunications
StatusClosed
Patent Owner
Operating Company
PACER
2:10-cv-09099
CourtC.D. California
Judge | Period | PO Win Rate |
|---|---|---|
12/20/10 - 11/07/12 | 21% | |
11/30/10 - 12/20/10 | 61% |
Plaintiff
Attorney
Name | Ratings |
|---|---|
L4 E | |
L5 E | |
L2 E | |
L5 E | |
L3 B | |
L2 E | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
L1 E | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- |
No Attorneys
Defendant
Party
Name | Ratings |
|---|---|
L2 B | |
L5 D | |
L5 D | |
L5 D | |
L4 A | |
L4 A | |
L4 A | |
L4 A | |
L4 A | |
L2 B | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
Pantech Corp NPE | -- -- -- |
Pantech Co Ltd NPE | -- -- -- |
No Parties
Attorney
Name | Ratings |
|---|---|
L5 A | |
L4 A | |
L4 B | |
L3 B | |
L3 B | |
L3 C | |
L2 E | |
L1 B | |
L1 D | |
-- -- -- | |
L5 A | |
L4 A | |
L4 A | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
L5 B | |
L4 E | |
L4 E | |
-- -- -- | |
L5 B | |
L3 A | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
L4 E | |
L5 A | |
L4 B | |
L2 A | |
L1 C | |
L2 A | |
L2 A | |
L1 C | |
L1 C | |
L2 D | |
Lim Ruger & KimLocal | -- -- -- |
-- -- -- |
No Attorneys