DCT

2:18-cv-01640

Canon Inc v. Ninestar Technology Co Ltd

Log In

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 2:18-cv-01640, C.D. Cal., 02/28/2018
  • Venue Allegations: Venue is alleged to be proper in the Central District of California because Defendant Ninestar Technology Company, Ltd. has a principal place of business in the district, and the other foreign-based defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction there.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendants' replacement toner cartridges infringe seven patents related to the mechanical coupling and drive mechanism for photosensitive drums in electrophotographic printers.
  • Technical Context: The dispute centers on the design of replaceable toner cartridges, a high-volume consumable product essential for the operation of laser printers and multifunction devices sold by various manufacturers.
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint notes that this district court action is related to a concurrently filed proceeding at the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), involving the same parties, patents, and accused products. ITC investigations typically proceed on an expedited timeline, and their outcomes can influence parallel district court litigation.

Case Timeline

Date Event
2006-12-22 Priority Date for all Asserted Patents
2017-08-29 U.S. Patent No. 9,746,826 Issues
2017-12-05 U.S. Patent No. 9,836,021 Issues
2017-12-12 U.S. Patent No. 9,841,727 Issues
2017-12-12 U.S. Patent No. 9,841,728 Issues
2018-01-02 U.S. Patent No. 9,857,765 Issues
2018-01-16 U.S. Patent No. 9,869,960 Issues
2018-01-23 U.S. Patent No. 9,874,846 Issues
2018-02-28 Complaint Filing Date

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 9,746,826 - “Process Cartridge, Electrophotographic Image Forming Apparatus, and Electrophotographic Photosensitive Drum Unit” (Issued August 29, 2017)

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent describes the challenge of designing a user-replaceable process cartridge for a printer that can be easily mounted and dismounted while ensuring that the rotational driving force from the printer body is smoothly and reliably transmitted to the photosensitive drum within the cartridge. (Compl. Ex. 1, ’826 Patent, col. 1:44-2:4).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention proposes a process cartridge with a specific coupling member designed to engage with a drive shaft in the main printer assembly. This coupling member is movable between an inclined "pre-engagement" position, which facilitates easy insertion of the cartridge, and an "engaged" position where it is coaxial with the drive shaft to permit stable, smooth rotation of the photosensitive drum. (’826 Patent, Abstract; col. 26:1-58).
  • Technical Importance: This mechanical arrangement seeks to balance the competing demands of user-friendliness (easy replacement) and operational precision (stable power transmission for high-quality printing). (’826 Patent, col. 2:37-55).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts independent claims 1 and 6. (Compl. ¶¶ 29-31).
  • Independent Claim 1 recites a process cartridge with elements including:
    • A casing including an opening and a protrusion.
    • A photosensitive drum with an axis L1.
    • A coupling member with an axis L2, operatively connected to the drum.
    • The coupling member is movable between a first position (where L2 is inclined relative to L1) and a second position (where L2 is coaxial with L1).
    • Specific distance relationships between projections on the coupling member and the drum in both the first and second positions.
  • Independent Claim 6 recites a process cartridge with similar elements, focusing on different distance relationships between a protrusion and the coupling member depending on the coupling member's position.
  • The complaint also asserts dependent claims 2, 4, 7, and 9. (Compl. ¶¶ 29-31).

U.S. Patent No. 9,836,021 - “Process Cartridge, Electrophotographic Image Forming Apparatus, and Electrophotographic Photosensitive Drum Unit” (Issued December 5, 2017)

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: As with the related ’826 Patent, this patent addresses the need for a simple and reliable mechanism for coupling a replaceable toner cartridge to a printer's drive motor to rotate the internal photosensitive drum. (’021 Patent, col. 1:44-2:4).
  • The Patented Solution: The patent describes a cartridge with a coupling member that includes "wing portions." This coupling member is movable between a first position, where a tip of the wing portion is a certain distance from the drum, and a second position where it is a different distance away, allowing for a transition from an inclined to a coaxial orientation with the printer's drive shaft upon insertion. (’021 Patent, Abstract; col. 27:1-30).
  • Technical Importance: This specific geometry aims to ensure a reliable mechanical engagement and stable torque transmission, contributing to consistent print quality over the life of the consumable cartridge. (’021 Patent, col. 2:37-55).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts independent claim 1. (Compl. ¶¶ 39-41).
  • Independent Claim 1 recites a process cartridge with elements including:
    • A developer contained in a casing.
    • A photosensitive drum rotatably supported on an axis L1.
    • A coupling member having an axis L2 and operatively connected to the drum and developer roller.
    • The coupling member includes a first end portion, a second end portion with wing portions, and a connecting portion.
    • The coupling member is movable between a first position and a second position, which are defined by the distance of the wing portions from the drum.
  • The complaint also asserts dependent claims 2, 4, 5, and 7. (Compl. ¶¶ 39-41).

U.S. Patent No. 9,841,727 - “Process Cartridge, Electrophotographic Image Forming Apparatus, and Electrophotographic Photosensitive Drum Unit” (Issued December 12, 2017)

Technology Synopsis

This patent, from the same family as the ’826 and ’021 patents, also discloses a process cartridge with a movable coupling member. The claims focus on the interaction between this coupling member and a "guide member" that helps direct the cartridge into its operational position within the printer, ensuring proper alignment with the drive shaft. (Compl. ¶¶ 47, 49; ’727 Patent, Abstract).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • Asserted Claims: Independent claims 1 and 16 are asserted. (Compl. ¶¶ 49-51).
  • Accused Features: The complaint alleges that the coupling mechanism and overall design of the accused "Type F," "Type G," and "Type H" cartridges infringe this patent. (Compl. ¶¶ 49-51).

U.S. Patent No. 9,841,728 - “Process Cartridge Having Changeable Relative Positioning of a Coupling Member and Another Part of the Process Cartridge” (Issued December 12, 2017)

Technology Synopsis

This patent relates to a process cartridge where the coupling member is movable between a first configuration and a second configuration. The claims specify the distances between a projection on the coupling member and the cartridge's guide member in these two configurations, defining the path of engagement. (Compl. ¶¶ 57, 59; ’728 Patent, Abstract).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • Asserted Claims: Independent claims 1 and 16 are asserted. (Compl. ¶¶ 59-61).
  • Accused Features: The coupling and guide member structures of the accused "Type F," "Type G," and "Type H" cartridges are alleged to infringe. (Compl. ¶¶ 59-61).

U.S. Patent No. 9,857,765 - “Process Cartridge, Electrophotographic Image Forming Apparatus, and Electrophotographic Photosensitive Drum Unit” (Issued January 2, 2018)

Technology Synopsis

This patent also discloses a process cartridge with a movable coupling member having an outer surface. The claims focus on the maximum distance from the coupling member's axis to its outer surface, and how that distance changes as the coupling member moves from its first (inclined) position to its second (engaged) position. (Compl. ¶¶ 67, 69; ’765 Patent, Abstract).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • Asserted Claims: Independent claims 1 and 13 are asserted. (Compl. ¶¶ 69-71).
  • Accused Features: The geometry and movement of the coupling member in the accused "Type F," "Type G," and "Type H" cartridges are alleged to infringe. (Compl. ¶¶ 69-71).

U.S. Patent No. 9,869,960 - “Process Cartridge, Electrophotographic Image Forming Apparatus, and Electrophotographic Photosensitive Drum Unit” (Issued January 16, 2018)

Technology Synopsis

This patent discloses a process cartridge with a movable coupling member comprising inner and outer portions. The claims focus on the maximum distances from the coupling member's axis to the surfaces of these inner and outer portions, and how these distances relate to each other as the coupling member moves between positions. (Compl. ¶¶ 77, 79; ’960 Patent, Abstract).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 1 is asserted. (Compl. ¶¶ 79-81).
  • Accused Features: The specific structure and dimensions of the coupling member in the accused "Type F," "Type G," and "Type H" cartridges are alleged to infringe. (Compl. ¶¶ 79-81).

U.S. Patent No. 9,874,846 - “Process Cartridge Having Changeable Relative Positioning of a Coupling Member and Another Part of the Process Cartridge” (Issued January 23, 2018)

Technology Synopsis

This patent discloses a drum unit for a process cartridge with a drum flange and a movable coupling member. The claims focus on the distances from the coupling member's axis to its inner and outer portions and how these dimensions change between the first and second positions relative to the drum flange. (Compl. ¶¶ 87, 89; ’846 Patent, Abstract).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 1 is asserted. (Compl. ¶¶ 89-91).
  • Accused Features: The drum units contained within the accused "Type F," "Type G," and "Type H" cartridges are alleged to infringe. (Compl. ¶¶ 89-91).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

Product Identification

The accused products are replacement toner cartridges, including models NHCF226A ("Type F"), NHCF280A ("Type G"), NH-CE505A ("Type G"), NHCE505AJ ("Type G"), NHCE255A ("Type H"), and NHCE255X ("Type H"). (Compl. ¶¶ 23-25, 27).

Functionality and Market Context

These products are third-party consumable cartridges designed to be used in various models of Canon and HP laser printers. (Compl. ¶ 22). The complaint alleges they are imported, sold, and offered for sale within the United States. (Compl. ¶ 22). The complaint includes photographs of the packaging and the physical appearance of representative accused cartridges. For example, a photograph shows the accused NHCF226A toner cartridge, a black plastic assembly with a visible gear and coupling mechanism at one end. (Compl. p. 6). Another photograph shows the accused model NHCF280A, which has a similar overall configuration. (Compl. p. 6).

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

The complaint alleges infringement of all seven asserted patents but incorporates by reference external claim chart exhibits (Exhibits 8-28) that were not filed with the publicly available complaint. (Compl. ¶¶ 29, 39, 49, 59, 69, 79, 89). Therefore, a detailed element-by-element analysis based on the plaintiff's specific theories is not possible from the provided documents. The narrative allegations for each patent are summarized below.

  • ’826 Patent Infringement Allegations
    The complaint alleges that the accused "Type F," "Type G," and "Type H" toner cartridges literally infringe at least independent claims 1 and 6 of the ’826 Patent. (Compl. ¶¶ 29-31, 33). The core of the infringement theory appears to be that the mechanical coupling on the accused cartridges has a structure and range of motion that meets the limitations of these claims regarding the movement between an inclined first position and a coaxial second position for engaging the printer's drive shaft.

  • Identified Points of Contention:

    • Scope Questions: A central question for claim construction may be the precise meaning of a "coupling member" that is "movable between (i) a first position... and (ii) a second position" as recited in Claim 1. The dispute may focus on whether this requires two stable, distinct states, or if it can be read more broadly to cover a continuous path of travel during insertion.
    • Technical Questions: What evidence does the complaint provide that the accused cartridges' coupling mechanism actually moves through the specific inclined and coaxial states defined by the claim's distance limitations? The case may turn on technical evidence, such as 3D scans or operational videos, demonstrating the precise path and positioning of the coupling during insertion and operation.

  • ’021 Patent Infringement Allegations
    The complaint asserts that the accused cartridges infringe at least independent claim 1 of the ’021 Patent. (Compl. ¶¶ 39-41). The infringement theory likely focuses on the structure of the "wing portions" on the accused coupling member and whether their movement during cartridge insertion satisfies the specific distance-based definitions of the "first position" and "second position" as recited in the claim.

  • Identified Points of Contention:

    • Scope Questions: Do the structures on the accused coupling member constitute "wing portions" as that term is understood in the context of the patent? The parties may dispute whether the specification limits this term to a specific shape or configuration not present in the accused products.
    • Technical Questions: Does the tip of the accused "wing portion" move relative to the photosensitive drum in a manner that satisfies the "first distance" and "second distance" requirements of the claim? This will likely be a battle of measurements and expert technical testimony.

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

  • The Term: "movable between (i) a first position...and (ii) a second position" (from ’826 Patent, Claim 1)
  • Context and Importance: This phrase is at the heart of the claimed invention for the ’826 Patent and several others in the family. Its construction will determine whether infringement requires the coupling member to have two distinct, stable states or whether it simply describes the start and end points of its travel during insertion. Practitioners may focus on this term because if it is construed narrowly to require a specific type of multi-state mechanism, it could provide a path to non-infringement for the defendant.
  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The "Summary of the Invention" describes the invention's object as providing a cartridge that is "capable of smoothly solving the above described problems," which may support an interpretation focused on the functional result rather than a specific structure. (’826 Patent, col. 2:37-43).
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The detailed description and figures repeatedly illustrate a specific sequence of movement where the coupling member is first inclined and then pivots to become coaxial. For example, Figure 22 shows the state "in which the coupling 150 is engaged with the drive shaft 180 and the coupling 150 is substantially co-axial to each other." (’826 Patent, col. 28:28-31). A defendant may argue these specific embodiments limit the claim's scope to a mechanism that operates in this exact manner.

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The complaint alleges inducement of infringement for all asserted patents. The basis for this allegation is that Defendants promote their cartridges for use in specific printers and provide customers with instructions for using them, thereby allegedly encouraging customers to perform the infringing act of installing and using the cartridges. (Compl. ¶¶ 28, 38, 48, 58, 68, 78, 88).
  • Willful Infringement: The complaint does not explicitly use the term "willful infringement." However, for each patent, it alleges that "Defendants knowingly induce customers to use their toner cartridges" and states that "At the very latest, Defendants will be given notice of their infringement...upon being served with this Complaint." (Compl. ¶¶ 28, 38, 48, 58, 68, 78, 88). These allegations may be intended to support a claim for enhanced damages based on post-filing knowledge of the patents.

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

  • A core issue will be one of mechanical operation: does the coupling mechanism on the accused toner cartridges, during insertion and use, actually move through the distinct "inclined" and "coaxial" positions defined by the geometric and distance limitations in the asserted claims, or does it achieve engagement through a technically different, non-infringing method?
  • A key procedural question will be the impact of the parallel ITC proceeding. Given the ITC's expedited schedule, any early claim construction rulings or findings on infringement and validity in that forum could heavily influence the strategy, pacing, and potential resolution of this district court case.
  • The case will also present a question of claim differentiation: with seven highly similar patents from the same family asserted simultaneously, a significant issue will be whether the subtle differences in claim language across the various patents provide distinct scopes of coverage, or if the infringement analysis will effectively rise and fall together for the entire patent portfolio.