DCT

2:18-cv-01679

Canon Inc v. Frontier Imaging Inc

Log In

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 2:18-cv-01679, C.D. Cal., 02/28/2018
  • Venue Allegations: Venue is asserted on the basis that Defendant is incorporated, resides, has a regular and established place of business, and has committed alleged acts of infringement within the Central District of California.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s replacement toner cartridges, for use in various Canon and HP laser printers, infringe a portfolio of nine U.S. patents related to the mechanical design of process cartridges and their components.
  • Technical Context: The patents relate to the mechanical coupling mechanisms that allow a removable toner/drum cartridge to reliably receive rotational force from the main body of a printer or copier.
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint notes that this action is related to a concurrent proceeding filed in the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), which involves the same parties, patents, and accused products. The filing of a parallel ITC investigation often signals a plaintiff's intent to seek an exclusion order to block the importation of accused products in addition to seeking monetary damages in district court.

Case Timeline

Date Event
2006-12-22 Earliest Priority Date for Asserted Patents
2017-08-29 U.S. Patent No. 9,746,826 Issues
2017-12-05 U.S. Patent No. 9,836,021 Issues
2017-12-12 U.S. Patent No. 9,841,727 Issues
2017-12-12 U.S. Patent No. 9,841,728 Issues
2017-12-12 U.S. Patent No. 9,841,729 Issues
2018-01-02 U.S. Patent No. 9,857,764 Issues
2018-01-02 U.S. Patent No. 9,857,765 Issues
2018-01-16 U.S. Patent No. 9,869,960 Issues
2018-01-23 U.S. Patent No. 9,874,846 Issues
2018-02-28 Complaint Filed

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 9,746,826 - "Process Cartridge, Electrophotographic Image Forming Apparatus, and Electrophotographic Photosensitive Drum Unit"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,746,826, "Process Cartridge, Electrophotographic Image Forming Apparatus, and Electrophotographic Photosensitive Drum Unit," issued August 29, 2017.

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent describes the technical challenge of smoothly and reliably coupling a user-replaceable process cartridge (containing a photosensitive drum) with the main drive motor of a printer. A misalignment between the cartridge's coupling and the printer's drive shaft can prevent proper engagement or cause uneven rotation of the drum, leading to poor image quality. (’826 Patent, col. 2:1-38).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention proposes a specific mechanical coupling member on the drum unit that is movable relative to the drum's rotational axis (axis L1). This coupling can move from a first position to a second, more distant position, allowing it to engage with the printer's drive shaft even if there is some initial misalignment during insertion. The geometry of the coupling, including projections and surfaces, is designed to guide the components into a co-axial alignment as rotational force is applied. (’826 Patent, Abstract; col. 27:1-35).
  • Technical Importance: This design aims to improve the user experience and operational reliability of printers with replaceable cartridges by making the insertion and removal process more forgiving of misalignment. (’826 Patent, col. 2:39-53).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts independent claims 1 and 6. (Compl. ¶26).
  • Independent Claim 1 requires a process cartridge with elements including:
    • A casing with an opening and at least one protrusion.
    • A photosensitive drum rotatably supported in the casing.
    • A coupling member having a first end portion connected to the drum, a second end portion, and a connecting portion between them.
    • The coupling member is movable between a first position and a second position, where the tip of a projection on the coupling is further away from the drum in the second position.
  • Independent Claim 6 requires a process cartridge with similar elements, but focuses on the protrusion on the casing being "provided adjacent to the coupling member with at least part of the connecting portion of the coupling member being uncovered to outside of the casing".
  • The complaint does not explicitly reserve the right to assert dependent claims, but lists several dependent claims as being infringed for certain products. (Compl. ¶26).

U.S. Patent No. 9,836,021 - "Process Cartridge, Electrophotographic Image Forming Apparatus, and Electrophotographic Photosensitive Drum Unit"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,836,021, "Process Cartridge, Electrophotographic Image Forming Apparatus, and Electrophotographic Photosensitive Drum Unit," issued December 5, 2017.

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: Similar to the '826 Patent, this patent addresses the need for a process cartridge that is "detachably mountable, and is mountable to and dismountable from the main assembly of the apparatus with reliability." (’021 Patent, col. 1:17-21). It seeks to solve problems associated with transmitting rotational force from a drive shaft in the printer body to the photosensitive drum within the cartridge. (’021 Patent, col. 2:1-38).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention claims a process cartridge with a specific coupling member that has "wing portions" and is movable between different positions relative to the drum. The claims define the relationship between the positions of these wing portions and the drum, specifying that in one position a tip is a first distance away, and in a second position it is a greater distance away, facilitating engagement with the printer's drive mechanism. (’021 Patent, Abstract; col. 27:1-35).
  • Technical Importance: The claimed configuration seeks to provide a robust and user-friendly method for engaging the cartridge with the printer's drive system, ensuring smooth power transmission for high-quality image formation. (’021 Patent, col. 2:39-53).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts independent claim 1. (Compl. ¶35).
  • Independent Claim 1 requires a process cartridge with elements including:
    • A casing.
    • A photosensitive drum and a developing roller.
    • A coupling member with a first end portion connected to the drum and developing roller, a second end portion with "wing portions," and a connecting portion.
    • The coupling member is movable between a first position where a tip of a wing portion is a "first distance" from the drum, and a second position where the tip is a "second distance" from the drum, with the second distance being greater than the first.
  • The complaint asserts infringement of dependent claims 2, 4, 5, and 7. (Compl. ¶¶35-36).

Multi-Patent Capsules

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,841,727, "Process Cartridge, Electrophotographic Image Forming Apparatus, and Electrophotographic Photosensitive Drum Unit," issued December 12, 2017.

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent relates to a process cartridge with a guide member that interacts with the cartridge's coupling member. The relative positioning of the guide member and coupling member is claimed to ensure proper alignment and engagement with the printer's drive shaft. (’727 Patent, Abstract).

  • Asserted Claims: Independent claims 1 and 16 are asserted. (Compl. ¶¶44-45).

  • Accused Features: The complaint alleges that the accused cartridges' coupling and casing structures infringe this patent. (Compl. ¶¶44-45).

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,841,728, "Process Cartridge Having Changeable Relative Positioning of a Coupling Member and Another Part of the Process Cartridge," issued December 12, 2017.

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent describes a process cartridge where a coupling member has a projection that moves between relative positions defined by a guide member. The invention focuses on the distances of the projection's tip from the end of the guide member in different configurations to facilitate reliable coupling. (’728 Patent, Abstract).

  • Asserted Claims: Independent claims 1 and 16 are asserted. (Compl. ¶¶53-54).

  • Accused Features: The coupling, casing, and guide features of the accused cartridges are alleged to infringe. (Compl. ¶¶53-54).

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,841,729, "Process Cartridge, Electrophotographic Image Forming Apparatus, and Electrophotographic Photosensitive Drum Unit," issued December 12, 2017.

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent relates to a process cartridge with a specific recess in the end portion of the coupling member. The shape and function of this recess are designed to interact with the printer's drive shaft to achieve proper engagement and torque transmission. (’729 Patent, Abstract).

  • Asserted Claims: Independent claims 1, 9, and 18 are asserted. (Compl. ¶62).

  • Accused Features: The recessed features and overall structure of the coupling member in the accused cartridges are implicated. (Compl. ¶62).

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,857,764, "Process Cartridge, Electrophotographic Image Forming Apparatus, and Electrophotographic Photosensitive Drum Unit," issued January 2, 2018.

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent is directed to a drum unit within a process cartridge. It claims a specific relationship between the drum, a drum flange, and a movable coupling member, focusing on the distances and relative positions of projections on the coupling member to ensure proper operation. (’764 Patent, Abstract).

  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 7 is asserted. (Compl. ¶70).

  • Accused Features: The drum units contained within the accused cartridges, including their drum flanges and coupling members, are alleged to infringe. (Compl. ¶70).

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,857,765, "Process Cartridge, Electrophotographic Image Forming Apparatus, and Electrophotographic Photosensitive Drum Unit," issued January 2, 2018.

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent covers a process cartridge with a coupling member that is movable and has specific projections. The claims describe the relative movement of the coupling and the distances of its projections from the photosensitive drum in different positions, and also introduce an "urging member" (like a spring) to position the coupling. (’765 Patent, Abstract).

  • Asserted Claims: Independent claims 1, 4, and 13 are asserted. (Compl. ¶¶78-79).

  • Accused Features: The complaint implicates the coupling mechanisms and any associated urging members in the accused cartridges. (Compl. ¶¶78-79).

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,869,960, "Process Cartridge, Electrophotographic Image Forming Apparatus, and Electrophotographic Photosensitive Drum Unit," issued January 16, 2018.

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent claims a process cartridge with a coupling member that includes inner and outer portions. The relative geometry of these portions and their connection to the drum flange are described, along with the movable nature of the coupling member between different positions relative to the drum. (’960 Patent, Abstract).

  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 1 is asserted. (Compl. ¶¶87-88).

  • Accused Features: The specific inner/outer construction of the coupling members in the accused cartridges is targeted. (Compl. ¶¶87-88).

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,874,846, "Process Cartridge, Electrophotographic Image Forming Apparatus, and Electrophotographic Photosensitive Drum Unit," issued January 23, 2018.

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent is directed to a drum unit that includes a drum, a drum flange, and a movable coupling member. The claims focus on the spatial relationship and movement of the coupling member's projections relative to the drum and flange to facilitate engagement with a drive shaft. (’846 Patent, Abstract).

  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 1 is asserted. (Compl. ¶¶96-97).

  • Accused Features: The drum units and their specific coupling geometries within the accused cartridges are alleged to infringe. (Compl. ¶¶96-97).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

Product Identification

The accused instrumentalities are replacement toner cartridges sold and/or imported by Defendant Frontier Imaging Inc. for use in various Canon and HP laser printers. (Compl. ¶20). The complaint identifies two representative product designs, designating them as "Type A" (e.g., models TCF280A, TCE255A) and "Type B" (e.g., model AP-HF226A). (Compl. ¶¶21, 22).

Functionality and Market Context

The accused products are designed as third-party, non-OEM replacements for original Canon and HP toner cartridges. (Compl. ¶20). The complaint provides an image showing a "REVOLUTION Toner Cartridge" box for model TCF280A, illustrating one type of accused product packaging. (Compl. ¶21). Another image shows a "PREMIUM TONER CARTRIDGE" for model AP-HF226A, which is alleged to have a different design ("Type B"). (Compl. ¶22). These cartridges contain toner and the necessary mechanical components, including a photosensitive drum and a drive coupling, to function within the designated printers. (Compl. ¶¶25, 70, 96). The complaint alleges these are sold for a wide range of popular Canon and HP printer models, suggesting they compete in a significant aftermarket for printer consumables. (Compl. p. 5).

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

The complaint references, but does not include, claim chart exhibits that purportedly detail the infringement of each asserted patent. (Compl. ¶¶26, 35, 44, 53, 62, 70, 78, 87, 96). In the absence of these exhibits, the infringement analysis is based on the narrative allegations.

U.S. Patent No. 9,746,826 Infringement Allegations

The complaint alleges that Defendant’s "Type A" (e.g., TCF280A) and "Type B" (e.g., AP-HF226A) cartridges directly infringe one or more claims, including independent claims 1 and 6. (Compl. ¶¶26, 27). The core of the allegation is that the mechanical structure of the accused cartridges, specifically the coupling member that engages with the printer's drive motor, contains all the elements recited in the asserted claims. (Compl. ¶29). The complaint states that claim charts detailing how representative cartridges infringe claims 1 and 6 are attached as Exhibits 10 and 11, but these were not filed with the complaint. (Compl. ¶¶26, 27).

Identified Points of Contention

  • Scope Questions: A central question may be whether the specific geometry and components of the accused cartridges meet the detailed limitations of the claims. For example, does the accused coupling member have a "first end portion," a "second end portion," and a "connecting portion" that are structurally and functionally analogous to those described in the patent?
  • Technical Questions: The claims require the coupling member to be "movable" between two distinct positions, with specific dimensional changes relative to the drum's axis. A key technical question will be whether the accused cartridges' couplings actually exhibit this specific type of movement during the printer insertion and engagement process, or if they operate on a different mechanical principle. The evidence required to prove this movement may be a point of dispute.

U.S. Patent No. 9,836,021 Infringement Allegations

The complaint alleges that both "Type A" and "Type B" cartridges infringe independent claim 1 of the ’021 Patent. (Compl. ¶¶35, 36). The infringement theory appears to map the components of the accused cartridges—casing, drum, developing roller, and coupling—onto the elements of claim 1. (Compl. ¶38). The complaint states that claim charts detailing this infringement are attached as Exhibits 12 and 13, but these were also not filed. (Compl. ¶¶35, 36).

Identified Points of Contention

  • Scope Questions: Claim 1 of the '021 patent requires "wing portions" on the coupling member. The definition and scope of "wing portions" will likely be a focus of claim construction and may be a key point of dispute in determining infringement.
  • Technical Questions: Similar to the '826 patent, claim 1 requires movement between a "first distance" and a "second distance" from the photosensitive drum. The factual question will be whether the accused cartridges' "wing portions" move in the precise manner required by the claim, and what evidence the plaintiff can provide to demonstrate this specific dimensional change during operation.

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

The complaint does not provide sufficient detail for analysis of claim construction disputes, as it explicitly states that Canon's contentions will be provided later. (Compl. ¶28). However, based on the asserted claims, certain terms may become central to the case.

For the ’826 Patent

  • The Term: "a coupling member ... being movable between (i) a first position ... and (ii) a second position"
  • Context and Importance: The entire inventive concept appears to rest on the specific nature of this movement. The dispute will likely turn on whether the accused device's coupling exhibits the precise type of positional change defined in the claim relative to the photosensitive drum. Practitioners may focus on this term because it is the functional heart of the claim.
  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The claims themselves do not specify the mechanism causing the movement, which may support an interpretation covering any structure that achieves the claimed positional change, regardless of the precise means.
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The specification heavily details specific embodiments where the coupling member pivots or inclines. (e.g., ’826 Patent, FIG. 22; col. 27:46-59). A defendant may argue that the term should be limited to the types of pivoting or inclining movements shown, rather than any change in position.

For the ’021 Patent

  • The Term: "a second end portion including wing portions"
  • Context and Importance: This term is a key structural limitation of the coupling member in claim 1 of the '021 patent. Whether the accused device has structures that can be defined as "wing portions" will be critical for infringement.
  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The patent does not provide an explicit definition of "wing portions," which may allow for a broad interpretation covering various projections or protrusions on the coupling member that engage with the drive shaft.
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The figures, such as Figure 8, show a specific structure for the end of the coupling member (150) that includes distinct projections (e.g., 150g, 150c) that could be construed as the "wing portions." A defendant may argue the term is limited to structures closely resembling these depicted embodiments.

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: Canon alleges induced infringement for all asserted patents. The complaint asserts that Frontier knowingly induces its customers to infringe by promoting its cartridges for use in specific Canon and HP printers and by "providing customers with instructions for using its cartridges in those printers." (Compl. ¶¶25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 69, 77, 86, 95).
  • Willful Infringement: The complaint does not use the word "willful." However, for each patent, it states that "At the very latest, Defendant will be given notice of its infringement of the [asserted] patent upon being served with this Complaint." (e.g., Compl. ¶25). This language serves to establish post-filing knowledge, which could form the basis for a subsequent claim of willful infringement and enhanced damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284.

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

  1. A central issue will be one of structural and functional correspondence: Do the coupling mechanisms in Frontier’s third-party toner cartridges possess the specific, multi-part geometries and exhibit the precise type of movement between distinct positions as detailed in the independent claims of Canon’s patents? The case may depend on expert testimony and technical analysis comparing the physical operation of the accused products against the patent language.
  2. A second key issue will be one of claim scope: How broadly will the court construe terms like "coupling member," "wing portions," and the phrases defining relative distances and positions? The outcome of claim construction will likely determine whether Frontier's designs, which may have been engineered to differ from Canon's, are nonetheless captured by the scope of the asserted claims.
  3. Given the parallel ITC action, a significant procedural question will be case management: How will the district court case proceed in relation to the ITC investigation? The findings and claim construction rulings from the faster-moving ITC proceeding could significantly influence the strategy and potential outcomes in this district court litigation.