DCT

2:18-cv-01685

Canon Inc v. I8 Intl Inc

Log In

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: Canon Inc. v. i8 International, Inc., 2:18-cv-01685, C.D. Cal., 02/28/2018
  • Venue Allegations: Venue is alleged to be proper as Defendant is incorporated in California, resides in the judicial district, has a regular and established place of business in the district, and has committed the alleged acts of infringement there.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s compatible replacement toner cartridges, sold for use in certain Canon and HP laser printers, infringe seven patents related to the mechanical coupling mechanism for the cartridge’s photosensitive drum.
  • Technical Context: The patents relate to the field of electrophotographic printing, where replaceable, all-in-one process cartridges containing toner and a photosensitive drum are a significant and competitive market for consumables.
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint states that this action is related to a concurrent proceeding filed in the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) asserting the same patents against the same accused products. The parallel ITC action, which can proceed more quickly than district court litigation and potentially result in an order barring importation of accused products, may significantly influence the strategic posture of this case.

Case Timeline

Date Event
2006-12-22 Earliest Priority Date for all Asserted Patents
2017-08-29 U.S. Patent No. 9,746,826 Issued
2017-12-05 U.S. Patent No. 9,836,021 Issued
2017-12-12 U.S. Patent No. 9,841,727 Issued
2017-12-12 U.S. Patent No. 9,841,728 Issued
2018-01-02 U.S. Patent No. 9,857,765 Issued
2018-01-16 U.S. Patent No. 9,869,960 Issued
2018-01-23 U.S. Patent No. 9,874,846 Issued
2018-02-28 Complaint Filed

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 9,746,826 - "Process Cartridge, Electrophotographic Image Forming Apparatus, and Electrophotographic Photosensitive Drum Unit"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,746,826, issued August 29, 2017. (Compl. ¶9).

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent addresses the technical challenge of reliably transmitting rotational force from a printer's main drive motor to the photosensitive drum within a user-replaceable process cartridge. A key issue is ensuring a stable mechanical connection when the cartridge is installed, while also allowing it to be easily removed and replaced. (’826 Patent, col. 1:20-41).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention describes a cartridge with a specialized coupling member at one end of the photosensitive drum. This coupling member is designed to be movable between at least two distinct positions relative to the drum. This movement facilitates the engagement and disengagement with the printer's drive shaft, ensuring a smooth installation process and a secure coupling for transmitting torque during operation. ('826 Patent, Abstract; col. 2:48-56).
  • Technical Importance: The design of such a coupling is critical for print quality and device longevity, as an improper connection can lead to image defects or damage to the printer or cartridge. (Compl. ¶3).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts independent claims 1 and 6. (Compl. ¶23).
  • Independent Claim 1: The essential elements include:
    • A process cartridge with a casing and a photosensitive drum.
    • A coupling member connected to the drum, having first and second end portions.
    • The coupling member is movable between a "first position" (a first distance from the drum) and a "second position" (a second distance from the drum).
    • The first distance is greater than the second distance.
  • Independent Claim 6: The essential elements include:
    • A process cartridge with a casing and a photosensitive drum.
    • A coupling member connected to the drum, having first and second end portions.
    • The coupling member is movable between a "first position" and a "second position."
    • At least part of the second end portion is positioned adjacent to the outside of the casing when the coupling member is in the first position.
  • The complaint explicitly reserves the right to assert dependent claims 2, 4, 7, and 9. (Compl. ¶23).

U.S. Patent No. 9,836,021 - "Process Cartridge, Electrophotographic Image Forming Apparatus, and Electrophotographic Photosensitive Drum Unit"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,836,021, issued December 5, 2017. (Compl. ¶10).

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: Similar to the '826 Patent, this patent addresses the need for a detachable process cartridge to establish a reliable connection with the printer's main body to receive a driving force for the photosensitive drum. (’021 Patent, col. 1:20-29).
  • The Patented Solution: This invention also uses a movable coupling member at the end of the drum. The key feature is that the coupling member is movable between a first position where its axis is "coaxial" with the drum's axis, and a second "inclined position" where its axis is tilted relative to the drum's axis. This tilting capability is designed to allow the cartridge to be smoothly mounted and unmounted from the printer. ('021 Patent, Abstract; col. 2:48-56).
  • Technical Importance: This approach provides an alternative mechanical solution to achieve reliable coupling in a modular, user-replaceable cartridge system. (Compl. ¶3).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts independent claim 1. (Compl. ¶31).
  • Independent Claim 1: The essential elements include:
    • A process cartridge with a casing, a photosensitive drum, and a developing roller.
    • A coupling member operatively connected to the drum and roller.
    • The coupling member is movable between a first position where it is "coaxial" with the drum's axis and a second "inclined position."
  • The complaint explicitly reserves the right to assert dependent claims 2, 4, 5, and 7. (Compl. ¶31).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 9,841,727

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,841,727, issued December 12, 2017. (Compl. ¶11).
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent describes a process cartridge with a movable coupling member and a guide member. The invention focuses on the relative positioning and movement of the coupling member with respect to the guide member to facilitate engagement with the printer's drive shaft. (’727 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claims 1 and 16. (Compl. ¶39).
  • Accused Features: The coupling mechanism of the accused toner cartridges. (Compl. ¶39).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 9,841,728

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,841,728, issued December 12, 2017. (Compl. ¶12).
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent also discloses a process cartridge having a movable coupling member and a guide member. The claims are directed to the specific distances of a projection on the coupling member from the guide member in different cartridge configurations, ensuring proper alignment during mounting. (’728 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claims 1 and 16. (Compl. ¶47).
  • Accused Features: The coupling mechanism of the accused toner cartridges. (Compl. ¶47).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 9,857,765

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,857,765, issued January 2, 2018. (Compl. ¶13).
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent focuses on a process cartridge with a movable coupling member. The claimed invention centers on the changing distance between a part of the coupling member and the outer surface of the cartridge casing as the coupling member moves between its engaged and disengaged positions. (’765 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claims 1 and 13. (Compl. ¶55).
  • Accused Features: The coupling mechanism of the accused toner cartridges. (Compl. ¶55).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 9,869,960

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,869,960, issued January 16, 2018. (Compl. ¶14).
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent discloses a process cartridge that includes a drum flange at the end of the photosensitive drum. The claims define the invention by the relative distances between the movable coupling member and the drum flange in different operational positions. (’960 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 1. (Compl. ¶63).
  • Accused Features: The coupling mechanism of the accused toner cartridges. (Compl. ¶63).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 9,874,846

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,874,846, issued January 23, 2018. (Compl. ¶15).
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent is directed to a photosensitive drum unit that includes a drum flange and a movable coupling member. The invention is characterized by the dimensional relationship between the coupling member's projections and the drum flange, which changes as the coupling moves. (’846 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 1. (Compl. ¶71).
  • Accused Features: The drum units contained within the accused toner cartridges. (Compl. ¶71).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

Product Identification

  • The complaint identifies Defendant’s replacement toner cartridges, specifically naming model CBT-CF226A as a non-limiting example. (Compl. ¶19). This model is also referred to as "Type I" in the related ITC Proceeding. (Compl. ¶19).

Functionality and Market Context

  • The accused products are compatible toner cartridges sold for use in a wide range of Canon and HP laser beam printers. (Compl. ¶18, pp. 4-5). Defendant is alleged to sell these products in the United States under the brand name "Ink4Work," including through a storefront on Amazon.com. (Compl. ¶5). The complaint provides a photograph of the accused CBT-CF226A toner cartridge and its retail packaging. (Compl. p. 5). The products function as direct replacements for original manufacturer cartridges, containing the necessary toner, photosensitive drum, and mechanical components for operation within the designated printers.

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

The complaint references, but does not include, claim chart exhibits detailing the infringement allegations for the '826 and '021 patents. (Compl. ¶23, ¶31). The infringement theory is therefore summarized from the complaint's narrative allegations.

Canon alleges that each element of the asserted claims is literally present in the accused toner cartridges. (Compl. ¶25, ¶33). For the '826 Patent, this implies the accused CBT-CF226A cartridge has a coupling member that is physically movable between positions defined by different distances from the photosensitive drum. (Compl. ¶23). For the '021 Patent, the allegation is that the same cartridge's coupling member is movable between a position where it is coaxial with the drum and another position where it is inclined relative to the drum. (Compl. ¶31). Canon reserves the right to assert infringement under the doctrine of equivalents should any element not be found to be literally present. (Compl. ¶27, ¶33).

  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Factual Questions: A primary point of contention will be factual: does the coupling member in the accused CBT-CF226A cartridge actually move in the manner described by the claims of the '826 and '021 patents? The analysis will require physical inspection and measurement of the accused products to determine if they exhibit the claimed "movable" characteristics, such as changing distances from the drum or shifting between coaxial and inclined states.
    • Scope Questions: The dispute may also raise questions about the scope of the claim terms. For the '021 Patent, the definitions of "coaxial" and "inclined position" will be critical. The parties may dispute whether perfect geometric alignment is required for "coaxial" or if a functional alignment suffices, and what degree of angular deviation is necessary to meet the "inclined" limitation.

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

  • Term: "movable between (i) a first position...and (ii) a second position" ('826 Patent, Claim 1)

    • Context and Importance: This term is central to the infringement analysis for the '826 Patent, as it defines the core functionality of the claimed coupling member. The outcome of the case may depend on whether the accused device is found to have a coupling that is "movable" between two structurally distinct and measurable positions as defined in the claim.
    • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
      • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The claim language itself does not specify the mechanism or path of movement, only that it is "movable" between two end-states defined by their distance from the drum. This may support an interpretation covering any form of movement (e.g., sliding, pivoting, tilting) that results in the claimed positional change.
      • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The specification and figures primarily illustrate movement via tilting or inclining the coupling member. ('826 Patent, Fig. 15, col. 18:53-61). A defendant may argue that "movable" should be construed in light of these specific disclosed embodiments rather than encompassing all theoretical types of movement.

  • Term: "coaxial with the axis L1 of the photosensitive drum" ('021 Patent, Claim 1)

    • Context and Importance: This term defines the engaged, operational state of the coupling member. Proving infringement requires showing the accused product's coupling achieves a "coaxial" alignment with the drum. Practitioners may focus on this term because the degree of precision required by "coaxial" could be dispositive.
    • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
      • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The patent's purpose is to transmit rotational force smoothly. ('021 Patent, col. 2:48-56). This could support a functional definition where "coaxial" means sufficiently aligned to perform this function without binding or excessive wear, not necessarily perfect geometric collinearity.
      • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The term "coaxial" has a plain and ordinary meaning in geometry implying a shared axis. Figures such as 22(c) and the accompanying text describe the axes L1 and L2 becoming "substantially co-axial with each other" in the engaged state, which may suggest that something less than perfect alignment is contemplated but that a high degree of alignment is still required. ('021 Patent, col. 27:1-3).

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: Canon alleges inducement of infringement for all asserted patents. The complaint asserts that Defendant knowingly induces its customers to infringe by promoting the accused cartridges for use in specific listed printers and by providing instructions on how to install and use them, which constitutes the infringing act. (Compl. ¶22, ¶30, ¶38, ¶46, ¶54, ¶62, ¶70).
  • Willful Infringement: The complaint does not contain an explicit allegation of willful infringement or a request for enhanced damages in the prayer for relief. However, for each patent, the complaint states that "Defendant will be given notice of its infringement ... upon being served with this Complaint," which serves to establish post-filing knowledge as a potential basis for a later claim of willful infringement. (Compl. ¶22, ¶30, ¶38, ¶46, ¶54, ¶62, ¶70).

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

  • A core issue will be one of mechanical function and measurement: Can Canon demonstrate through testing and expert testimony that the coupling mechanism in Defendant’s mass-produced, third-party cartridges consistently performs the specific, multi-state movements required by the claims, such as shifting between distinct, measurable distances from the drum or between "coaxial" and "inclined" angular orientations?
  • A second central issue will be one of claim scope: How broadly will the court construe key terms like "movable," "coaxial," and "inclined"? The viability of the infringement case may depend on whether these terms are given a broad, functional interpretation or are limited more closely to the specific geometric configurations shown in the patent embodiments.
  • Finally, a key strategic question will be the impact of the parallel ITC investigation: Given the speed of ITC proceedings and the potent remedy of an exclusion order, the developments in that forum will likely exert significant pressure on the pace, discovery, and potential for settlement in this district court action.