DCT

2:25-cv-00764

Hisense USA Corp v. Polaris PowerLED Tech LLC

General

Filed

01/28/25

Cause of ActionPatent Infringement

SectorCommunications

StatusOpen

Patent Owner

Operating Company

PACER

Nature of Suit830 Patent

CourtC.D. California

Judge	Period	PO Win Rate
Sherilyn P. Garnett	06/11/25 - now	--

Plaintiff

Party

Name	Ratings
Hisense USA Corp	L2 B
Hisense Visual Technology Co Ltd	L2 B
Hisense Intl Hong Kong America Investments Co Ltd	L2 B
Hisense Electronics MFG Co Of America Corp	L2 B

No Parties

Attorney

Name	Ratings
Leydig Voit Mayer LTD	L3 E
David M. Airan	L4 E
Leydig Voit & Mayer LTD	L3 E
Aaron R. Feigelson	L2 E
Chris Gass	-- -- --
Gerald T. Gray	-- -- --
Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl LLP	L2 C
Robert D. Estrin	L1 C
Olson Stein LLPLocal	-- -- --
Nancy M. Olson	-- -- --
Bernstein IP StrategyLocal	-- -- --
Matthew C. Bernstein	-- -- --

No Attorneys

Defendant

Party

Name	Ratings
Polaris PowerLED Technologies LLC NPE	L4 E

No Parties

Attorney

Name	Ratings
Kramer Alberti Lim Tonkovich LLP	L2 C
David Alberti	L5 D
Sal Lim	L4 B
Jeremiah A. Armstrong	L3 C
Russell Tonkovich	L3 D
Robert F. Kramer	L3 E
Aidan Brewster	L1 D

No Attorneys