DCT

4:12-cv-00731

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v. OSRAM AG

General

Filed

02/15/12

Cause of ActionPatent Infringement

SectorSemicond., Optic

StatusClosed

Patent Owner

Operating Company

PACER

CourtN.D. California

Judge	Period	PO Win Rate
Yvonne G. Rogers	04/04/12 - 08/16/12	21%
Samuel Conti	02/16/12 - 04/04/12	--
David Folsom	10/04/11 - 02/16/12	40%
James R. Gilstrap	12/20/11 - 01/04/12	35%
T. John Ward	09/16/10 - 10/04/11	53%

MagistrateHoward R. Lloyd

Plaintiff

Party

Name	Ratings
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd	L5 E
Bluestone Innovations Texas LLC NPE	L1 E
Bluestone Innovations LLC NPE	L1 E

No Parties

Attorney

Name	Ratings
Covington & Burling LLP	L4 A
Robert T. Haslam	L4 B
Roderick R. McKelvie	L3 A
Dale A. Rice	L1 D
Joseph S. St John	-- -- --
Matthew Phelps	-- -- --
Roetzel & Andress	L2 E
Sunwoo Lee	L3 E
Kim E. Choate	L2 E
Jon B. Crocker	L2 E
Baldine B. Paul	-- -- --
Smith & GilstrapLocal	L1 B
James R. Gilstrap	L2 C

No Attorneys

Defendant

Party

Name	Ratings
OSRAM Ag	L2 D
OSRAM Sylvania Inc	L2 D
OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Inc	L2 D

No Parties

Attorney

Name	Ratings
Fish & Richardson	L5 E
Thomas B. Manuel	L2 A
Christopher G. Smith	-- -- --
Reed Smith LLP	L4 C
John P. Bovich	L5 E
Steven S. Baik	L4 A
Scott D. Baker	L4 E
James A. Daire	L4 E
Doyle B. Johnson	L2 E

No Attorneys