DCT

1:22-cv-01028

Caddo Systems Inc v. LightInTheBox Ltd Inc

Log In

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 1:22-cv-01028, D. Del., 01/06/2023
  • Venue Allegations: Venue is alleged based on Defendant LITB, Inc.’s incorporation in Delaware and Defendants’ regular business activities and sales of the accused products within the district.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiffs allege that Defendants’ e-commerce websites infringe seven patents related to an “Active Path Menu Navigation System” that dynamically generates a clickable “breadcrumb” trail for website navigation.
  • Technical Context: The technology addresses user interface design for navigating complex, multi-level information hierarchies, a foundational element of e-commerce and website usability.
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint alleges that Plaintiffs provided Defendants with a notice letter regarding the asserted patents on December 2, 2021, a fact which forms the basis for the allegations of willful infringement.

Case Timeline

Date Event
2002-06-06 Earliest Priority Date for all Asserted Patents
2007-03-13 U.S. Patent No. 7,191,411 Issued
2007-05-08 U.S. Patent No. 7,216,301 Issued
2009-12-29 U.S. Patent No. 7,640,517 Issued
2010-05-25 U.S. Patent No. 7,725,836 Issued
2013-01-08 U.S. Patent No. 8,352,880 Issued
2018-07-31 U.S. Patent No. 10,037,127 Issued
2021-11-23 U.S. Patent No. 11,182,053 Issued
2021-12-02 Defendants allegedly received notice letter
2023-01-06 First Amended Complaint Filed

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 7,191,411 - "Active Path Menu Navigation System"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 7,191,411, “Active Path Menu Navigation System,” issued March 13, 2007.

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent describes conventional “collapsing menu” systems in software as inefficient because navigation must always start from the top “root level,” and path-based systems require users to memorize and enter complex hierarchical text commands (’411 Patent, col. 1:37-67, col. 2:18-24).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention proposes a graphical user interface that dynamically constructs an “Active Path”—a sequence of selectable links representing the user’s navigation path—as the user makes selections from a hierarchical menu. This Active Path remains displayed after the main menu has collapsed, allowing the user to directly access any previous level in the hierarchy by clicking the corresponding link in the path (’411 Patent, col. 2:52-62).
  • Technical Importance: This approach sought to improve user experience by combining the visual guidance of menu systems with the direct-access efficiency of path-based navigation, a key challenge in complex software and early web design.

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts at least independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶32).
  • Essential Elements of Claim 1 (Method):
    • Providing a graphical user menu system for navigating a multi-level hierarchical collapsing menu structure where access requires sequential selection through preceding levels.
    • Automatically constructing an “Active Path” as a sequence of hierarchical, independently selectable active links corresponding to the user’s item selections.
    • Displaying the Active Path as an alternative navigation tool after the collapsing menu structure has collapsed.
    • Upon “pre-selecting” an active link (e.g., via mouse-over), triggering the display of “sibling menu items” on the same hierarchical level without disturbing the Active Path.
  • The complaint does not explicitly reserve the right to assert dependent claims.

U.S. Patent No. 7,216,301 - "Active Path Menu Navigation System"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 7,216,301, “Active Path Menu Navigation System,” issued May 8, 2007.

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent addresses the same problem of inefficient navigation in hierarchical information structures as the ’411 Patent, particularly the limitations of conventional collapsing menus that force users to restart navigation from the root level (’301 Patent, col. 1:39-66).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention describes a similar "Active Path" system that is dynamically constructed as a user navigates a menu. This patent’s claims focus on the functionality of the active links themselves, specifying that a given link enables a user to "directly browse all items on any given level... including all hierarchically subordinate items without affecting the Active Path" (’301 Patent, Abstract; col. 4:45-51).
  • Technical Importance: The technology aimed to make deep, complex information structures more accessible by creating a persistent, interactive navigational trail that supported both direct access to parent levels and exploration of child and sibling levels.

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts at least independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶53).
  • Essential Elements of Claim 1 (Method):
    • Providing a graphical user menu system for a hierarchical information structure.
    • Dynamically constructing an “Active Path” as a sequence of active links corresponding to selected items.
    • The active links provide direct access to a function, level, or menu item without needing to use the original menu system.
    • A given active link enables the user to "directly browse all items on any given level... including all hierarchically subordinate items without affecting the Active Path."
  • The complaint does not explicitly reserve the right to assert dependent claims.

U.S. Patent No. 7,640,517 - "Active Path Menu Navigation System"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 7,640,517, “Active Path Menu Navigation System,” issued December 29, 2009 (Compl. ¶20).
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent is directed to systems and methods for navigating within a hierarchical menu structure. The core inventive concept, similar to the previously analyzed patents, involves the generation of an "Active Path" of links that allows a user to trigger the display of menu items on the associated hierarchical level by rolling over a link with a pointing device, without disturbing the displayed Active Path (’517 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: At least independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶73).
  • Accused Features: The accused functionality is the websites' use of a breadcrumb navigation trail where hovering over a link (e.g., "Women's Clothing") displays a menu of its sub-categories without altering the breadcrumb trail itself (Compl. ¶78).

U.S. Patent No. 7,725,836 - "Active Path Menu Navigation System"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 7,725,836, “Active Path Menu Navigation System,” issued May 25, 2010 (Compl. ¶22).
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent describes a method for navigating a multi-level hierarchical information structure. It claims constructing an Active Path where a given active link enables a user to browse items starting from the level of that link, as well as items on subordinate levels, without affecting the overall Active Path (’836 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: At least independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶93).
  • Accused Features: The complaint accuses the websites' breadcrumb navigation system, which allows a user to click a link in the path to browse items starting from that point in the hierarchy (e.g., clicking "Women's Clothing" to see all women's clothing items) without altering the path display itself (Compl. ¶97).

U.S. Patent No. 8,352,880 - "Active Path Menu Navigation System"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 8,352,880, “Active Path Menu Navigation System,” issued January 8, 2013 (Compl. ¶24).
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent is directed to an apparatus and method for navigating an information structure. The claims describe dynamically constructing an Active Path and, upon "provisional selection" of an active link, displaying items on that level of the information structure without affecting the path (’880 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: At least independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶113).
  • Accused Features: The accused feature is the websites' breadcrumb trail, which upon a "provisional selection" (alleged to be a mouse-over) of a link, displays sub-category items without affecting the underlying active path (Compl. ¶116).

U.S. Patent No. 10,037,127 - "Active Path Menu Navigation System"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 10,037,127, “Active Path Menu Navigation System,” issued July 31, 2018 (Compl. ¶26).
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent describes an apparatus and method for navigating an information structure by providing a graphical menu interface and dynamically constructing an active path. The claims focus on the "provisional selection" of an active link causing the display of one or more items associated with that link's level, without affecting the active path, and allowing a user to access an item by selecting from the displayed items (’127 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: At least independent claim 14 (Compl. ¶133).
  • Accused Features: The complaint accuses the websites' breadcrumb navigation system where a provisional selection (hover) on a link displays related items, and a user can then select one of those displayed items to navigate further (Compl. ¶135-136).

U.S. Patent No. 11,182,053 - "Active Path Menu Navigation System"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 11,182,053, “Active Path Menu Navigation System,” issued November 23, 2021 (Compl. ¶28).
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent is directed to a method for generating and constructing a graphical user interface with selectable links. It claims a method where user selections of menu items (graphical, sibling, and children items) in a sequence are used to construct a GUI with corresponding selectable links (a first, second, and third link) arranged in the same sequence (’053 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: At least independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶151).
  • Accused Features: The accused feature is the websites' process of generating a sequential breadcrumb trail ("Home—Women's Clothing—New in Dresses") where each link corresponds to the user's sequential selection of menu items from different hierarchical levels (Compl. ¶156).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

Product Identification

Functionality and Market Context

  • The websites are online retail platforms that sell a wide variety of consumer goods. The accused functionality is the primary navigation system used to browse product categories. The complaint alleges that when a user navigates through categories (e.g., from the homepage to "Women's Clothing" to "Women's Dresses"), the websites display a hierarchical menu and dynamically generate a corresponding "Active Path," also known as a breadcrumb trail (Compl. ¶34-35). This trail consists of clickable links representing the user's path, allowing direct navigation back to any parent category (Compl. ¶36). The complaint also highlights the functionality where hovering over a link in this path displays a menu of sub-categories (Compl. ¶38). A screenshot provided in the complaint shows the multi-level menu structure that appears when a user interacts with the "All Categories" button (Compl. p. 9).

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

’411 Patent Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 1) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
providing a graphical user menu system displaying the items of a given level ... wherein access of said given level requires sequential access of each of the levels preceding said given level in the hierarchy The websites provide a multi-level hierarchical menu (e.g., "All Categories") where accessing a sub-category like "Women's Dresses" requires first accessing "All Categories" and then "Women's Clothing." ¶35 col. 1:45-52
automatically constructing an Active Path as a sequence of hierarchical active links as items are selected ... with one said active link corresponding to each of the items selected As a user selects items like "Women's Clothing" and "Women's Dresses," the websites automatically construct a breadcrumb trail, such as "Home > Women's Clothing > Women's Dresses," with a link for each selection. ¶35 col. 2:52-58
displaying the Active Path as an alternative ... after the user has finished selecting items ... such that the Active Path is displayed after the multi-level hierarchical collapsing menu structure has collapsed The complaint alleges the Active Path is displayed as an alternative navigation tool after the "All Categories" menu has collapsed. A visual example shows this resulting path (Compl. p. 10). ¶37 col. 1:37-44
wherein pre-selecting a given active link triggers the display of sibling menu items on the level associated with said given active link without disturbing the displayed Active Path Pre-selecting (hovering over) the "Women's Clothing" link in the Active Path allegedly displays sibling menu items (e.g., "Women's Tops," "Women's Swimwear") without altering the displayed path. A screenshot illustrates this hover-activated menu (Compl. p. 13). ¶38 col. 5:29-33
  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Scope Questions: A central question may be whether the term "collapsing menu structure" as described in the patent (’411 Patent, col. 1:37-44) reads on the dynamic, JavaScript-based fly-out menus common on modern websites. The defense may argue that the accused menus do not "collapse" in the manner contemplated by the patent.
    • Technical Questions: The analysis may focus on whether the accused websites' hover-activated drop-down menu (Compl. p. 13) meets the claim limitation of "pre-selecting a given active link [that] triggers the display of sibling menu items." Questions may arise regarding what constitutes "pre-selecting" versus "selecting" and whether the displayed items are properly characterized as "sibling" items as defined by the patent's hierarchy.

’301 Patent Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 1) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
providing a graphical user menu system displaying the items of a given level of the hierarchical information structure and enabling selection thereof The websites provide a graphical menu system (e.g., "All Categories") that displays hierarchical levels of product categories for user selection. ¶56 col. 2:50-52
dynamically constructing an Active Path as a sequence of active links as items are selected using the graphical user menu system The websites dynamically construct a breadcrumb trail (e.g., "Home—Women's Clothing—Women's Dresses") as the user selects categories. ¶56 col. 4:20-23
said active links providing direct access to one of a function, corresponding level and menu item without the need to navigate using said graphical user menu system Each link in the breadcrumb trail (e.g., "Women's Clothing") provides direct access back to that corresponding category level without requiring the user to navigate from the home page. A screenshot shows this breadcrumb trail providing direct access links (Compl. p. 23). ¶56 col. 4:56-61
wherein a given said active link enables the user to directly browse all items on any given level ... including all hierarchically subordinate items without affecting the Active Path The complaint alleges that a user can browse all items under "Women's Clothing," including its sub-categories ("Dresses," "Tops," etc.), by interacting with that link in the Active Path, without the path itself being altered. ¶57 col. 4:45-51
  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Scope Questions: The dispute may center on the meaning of "directly browse all items." The complaint suggests this is satisfied by clicking a link in the breadcrumb trail to load a category page that lists all sub-categories (Compl. ¶57-58). A defendant may argue that "directly browse" requires a more specific interface or action, such as a hover-activated display, and that a page load constitutes a new navigation event that "affects" the path.
    • Technical Questions: An evidentiary question may be whether the accused functionality of displaying sub-categories upon a hover or click (Compl. p. 25) technically meets the limitation of browsing "without affecting the Active Path." While the sequence of links in the path may not change, the defense could argue that displaying a new page or a large overlay menu constitutes "affecting" the path from a user-interface perspective.

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

  • The Term: "collapsing menu structure" (’411 Patent, Claim 1)

  • Context and Importance: This term appears foundational to the preamble of claim 1 of the ’411 Patent. Its construction will be critical in determining whether the patent, which describes menu systems from the early 2000s, applies to the modern, dynamic web navigation interfaces of the accused websites.

  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:

    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The specification describes the menu as one that "collapses or disappears after a selection is made," a general behavior that could arguably encompass any non-persistent menu, including modern fly-out menus that disappear when the user moves the cursor away (’411 Patent, col. 1:40-44).
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The background section contrasts the invention with "traditional personal computer applications" and "pull-down menus" (FIG. 1A-1B), suggesting the term might be limited by the specific embodiments of older, pre-web-2.0 graphical user interfaces (’411 Patent, col. 1:37-52).

  • The Term: "directly browse" (’301 Patent, Claim 1)

  • Context and Importance: This term is the central functional element of the final limitation in claim 1 of the ’301 Patent. The infringement analysis for this patent will likely turn on whether the accused website's functionality (e.g., clicking a breadcrumb link to load a category page) constitutes "directly browsing."

  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:

    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The specification distinguishes "browsing" (associated with "rolling-over" an item to view its children) from "selecting" (a mouse-click to choose an item) (’301 Patent, col. 4:45-66). Plaintiffs may argue that any user action, including a click, that leads to the viewing of subordinate items without restarting navigation from the root satisfies the claim.
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: A defendant may argue that "directly browse" implies an immediate display of subordinate items without a full page load, more akin to the "rolling-over" action described in the specification. They may contend that clicking a link to navigate to a new URL is a "selection" that initiates a new path, rather than "browsing" the existing one.

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The complaint alleges induced infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b). It asserts that Defendants, with knowledge of the patents since at least December 2, 2021, intentionally encouraged infringement by providing the accused websites and promoting their use through advertising, technical support, social media, and press releases (Compl. ¶40-43, ¶60-63).
  • Willful Infringement: The complaint alleges that Defendants' infringement has been willful since at least December 2, 2021, the date they allegedly received Plaintiffs' notice letter. The willfulness claim is based on Defendants' continued operation of the accused websites despite having actual knowledge of the patents and the alleged infringement (Compl. ¶49, ¶69).

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

  • A core issue will be one of definitional scope: can terms like "collapsing menu structure," rooted in the patent's description of early-2000s desktop software, be construed to cover the dynamic, JavaScript-driven navigation menus used on modern e-commerce websites?
  • A key evidentiary question will be one of functional mapping: does the accused websites' use of a clickable and hover-responsive breadcrumb trail perform the specific, multi-part functions required by the claims—such as "pre-selecting" to show "sibling" items or "directly browsing" subordinate items "without affecting the Active Path"—or is there a fundamental mismatch in the claimed versus actual technical operation?
  • A procedural question for the court may be the degree of overlap across the seven asserted patents, which all share a common priority date and title. The extent to which the claims are determined to be patentably distinct versus cumulative could influence case management, claim construction, and potential damages calculations.