DCT

1:23-cv-00230

Green Pet Shop Enterprises LLC v. Comfort Revolution LLC

Log In

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 1:23-cv-00230, D. Del., 09/18/2023
  • Venue Allegations: Venue is alleged to be proper in the District of Delaware because the Defendant is a Delaware limited liability company.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s cooling gel pillows and related products infringe two patents related to pressure-activated, self-recharging cooling platforms.
  • Technical Context: The technology concerns materials that provide a cooling effect upon the application of pressure and can be reused without electricity or refrigeration, for use in consumer goods like pet beds and pillows.
  • Key Procedural History: The patents-in-suit claim priority to an application filed in 2010. The complaint alleges that Plaintiff sent Defendant a notice letter and claim chart asserting infringement of the ’685 Patent in August 2022, approximately one year before filing suit.

Case Timeline

Date Event
2010-04-14 Earliest Priority Date for ’685 and ’965 Patents
2014-12-31 Plaintiff began marking its product "no later than 2014"
2022-03-31 Alleged awareness of ’965 Patent application by Defendant
2022-06-16 Alleged awareness of ’685 Patent publication by Defendant
2022-07-05 U.S. Patent No. 11,375,685 Issued
2022-08-16 Plaintiff sent notice of infringement of ’685 Patent
2023-08-08 U.S. Patent No. 11,716,965 Issued
2023-09-18 Complaint Filed

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 11,375,685 - "Pressure Activated Recharging Cooling Platform"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 11,375,685, "Pressure Activated Recharging Cooling Platform," issued July 5, 2022.

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent describes conventional cooling beds for pets as suffering from two primary drawbacks: they either require an electrical power source, which makes them non-portable and subject to failure, or they use disposable ice packs that melt and require replacement (’685 Patent, col. 1:35-47).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention is a multi-layered cooling platform containing a chemical composition that is activated by pressure. The pressure from an object (e.g., a pet) sitting on the platform triggers an endothermic (heat-absorbing) reaction, creating a cooling effect. When the pressure is released, the composition "recharges" through a reverse reaction, making the platform reusable without external power or refrigeration (’685 Patent, col. 4:37-44).
  • Technical Importance: This approach provides for a portable, non-electric, and reusable cooling solution for various applications, including pet comfort and human use (’685 Patent, col. 1:45-47, col. 2:62-67).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts at least independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶15).
  • The essential elements of Claim 1 are:
    • A cooling platform comprising:
    • a temperature regulation layer comprising a cooling composition that absorbs heat when activated and releases heat when deactivated,
    • wherein the cooling composition undergoes an endothermic reaction when activated,
    • wherein the endothermic reaction is activated at least partially by an application of pressure, and
    • wherein the cooling platform is repeatedly activatable and deactivatable.
  • The complaint reserves the right to assert other claims (Compl. ¶22).

U.S. Patent No. 11,716,965 - "Pressure Activated Recharging Cooling Platform"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 11,716,965, "Pressure Activated Recharging Cooling Platform," issued August 8, 2023.

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent addresses the same problems as the ’685 Patent regarding the limitations of existing electric and ice-pack-based cooling products (’965 Patent, col. 1:31-44).
  • The Patented Solution: Like the ’685 Patent, this patent discloses a pressure-activated, recharging cooling platform. However, the claims focus more on the physical structure of the temperature regulation layer. This layer is described as having at least one "angled segment" formed by "channels," which serve to hold the cooling composition and manage its distribution under pressure (’965 Patent, Abstract; col. 2:40-52).
  • Technical Importance: The claimed structure seeks to optimize the cooling performance by controlling the flow of the composition and air within the platform, preventing the composition from being fully displaced under the weight of an object (’965 Patent, col. 5:46-55).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts at least independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶15).
  • The essential elements of Claim 1 are:
    • An endothermically activated and exothermically deactivated cooling platform comprising:
    • a temperature regulation layer, wherein the temperature regulation layer has at least one angled segment formed by a top side and a bottom side at a predefined distance, and at least one channel, wherein the channel forms a side by contacting the top side with the bottom side;
    • an endothermically activated and exothermically deactivated cooling composition contained inside the temperature regulation layer,
    • wherein the... cooling platform is repeatedly activatable and deactivatable.
  • The complaint reserves the right to assert other claims (Compl. ¶27).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

Product Identification

  • The lead accused product is the "Therapedic Cooling Gel & Memory Foam Pillow" (Compl. ¶14). The complaint also names a series of other products sold under the "Comfort Revolution" and "Hydraluxe" brands, including various pillows and a memory foam topper (Compl. ¶16).

Functionality and Market Context

  • The complaint identifies the accused products as having "cooling gel" (Compl. ¶16). However, the complaint does not provide specific details regarding the technical mechanism of this cooling gel or how the accused products are constructed internally. The complaint does not contain allegations regarding the products' specific market positioning or commercial importance.

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

The complaint references a claim chart for the ’685 Patent that was allegedly sent to the Defendant, but this chart is part of an exhibit not included with the complaint (Compl. ¶18). Therefore, the infringement theory is summarized from the complaint's narrative allegations.

The core of the infringement allegation is that the accused pillows and toppers meet all the limitations of at least claim 1 of both the ’685 and ’965 Patents (Compl. ¶15). The complaint alleges that the "cooling gel" in Defendant's products (Compl. ¶16) functions as the claimed "cooling composition." The infringement theory for the ’685 Patent appears to be that this gel undergoes a pressure-activated endothermic reaction when a user rests on the pillow, and that it recharges upon release of that pressure, making it "repeatedly activatable and deactivatable" as required by claim 1 of the ’685 Patent. For the ’965 Patent, the infringement theory must also include an allegation that the internal construction of the accused pillows contains the specific "angled segment" and "channel" structures recited in its claims.

No probative visual evidence provided in complaint.

  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Scope Questions: A potential issue for the court may be whether a consumer "pillow" or "topper" falls within the scope of the term "cooling platform" as used in the patents, which heavily discuss pet beds in the specification.
    • Technical Questions: A central dispute will likely concern the operational mechanism of the accused "cooling gel." A key question for the court is what evidence the complaint or subsequent discovery provides to show that the gel functions via a pressure-activated endothermic reaction, as claimed in the ’685 Patent, rather than through a different cooling mechanism, such as simple heat conduction or a temperature-activated phase change. For the ’965 Patent, a critical factual question will be whether the accused products are constructed with the specific "angled segment" and "channel" internal architecture required by the claims.

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

  • Term: "activated at least partially by an application of pressure" (’685 Patent, Claim 1)

    • Context and Importance: This term is the functional heart of the claim and distinguishes the invention from passive cooling technologies. The case may turn on whether the accused gel's cooling function is "activated" by pressure.
    • Intrinsic Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The phrase "at least partially" may support an argument that the claim covers any system where pressure is a contributing factor to the cooling effect, even if not the sole trigger.
    • Intrinsic Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The specification links this activation to "an endothermic process" and "Le Chatelier's principle," where pressure shifts a chemical equilibrium (’685 Patent, col. 4:37-44). This context may support a narrower construction requiring a specific type of chemical or physical reaction, not merely enhanced cooling from physical compression.

  • Term: "angled segment" (’965 Patent, Claim 1)

    • Context and Importance: This is a key structural limitation distinguishing the ’965 Patent. Infringement will depend on whether the accused products contain a structure that meets this definition.
    • Intrinsic Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The claim language itself does not define a specific angle or geometry, which could support a reading that covers various forms of compartments or cells within a pillow.
    • Intrinsic Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The patent figures depict a specific grid-like structure of segments formed by channels (’965 Patent, Fig. 2). The specification describes these channels as "effectively spac[ing] the top and bottom sides" to form the segments (’965 Patent, col. 2:47-49). This may support a narrower construction that requires more than just arbitrary internal divisions.

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The complaint does not plead a separate count for indirect infringement or allege specific facts, such as instructing users to infringe. However, the prayer for relief includes a request for an injunction against future "inducement of infringement" (Compl., Prayer for Relief ¶D).
  • Willful Infringement: The complaint alleges that Defendant had pre-suit knowledge of the ’685 Patent since at least August 16, 2022, when it received a notice of infringement and a claim chart from Plaintiff's counsel (Compl. ¶¶17-18, 23). The complaint further alleges knowledge of both patents based on their publication dates and asserts that Defendant's infringement continued despite this knowledge (Compl. ¶¶19, 23, 28). These allegations, coupled with the request for "treble damages," form the basis for a claim of willful infringement (Compl., Prayer for Relief ¶B).

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

This case appears to present two fundamental questions for the court's determination, one centered on technology and the other on structure.

  • A core issue will be one of technical mechanism: Does the Defendant's "cooling gel" technology operate via the "pressure-activated endothermic reaction" required by the patent claims, or does it achieve its cooling effect through an alternative physical principle not covered by the patents? The resolution of this question will likely require detailed expert analysis of the accused products' material composition and function.
  • A second key evidentiary question, specific to the ’965 Patent, will be one of structural correspondence: Do the accused pillows and toppers possess the specific internal architecture of "angled segments" and "channels" as defined in the patent's claims and illustrated in its figures? This will be a factual determination contingent on evidence of the products' physical construction obtained during discovery.