DCT

6:14-cv-00687

ParkerVision Inc v. Qualcomm Inc

Log In

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 6:14-cv-00687, M.D. Fla., 08/21/2014
  • Venue Allegations: Plaintiff alleges venue is proper in the Middle District of Florida based on Defendants' business activities in the state and the Court's experience with related technology from prior litigation between ParkerVision and Qualcomm.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendants' wireless communication chipsets and the mobile devices (e.g., smartphones, tablets) that incorporate them infringe a portfolio of eleven patents related to radio frequency (RF) signal up-conversion, down-conversion, and multi-mode communication technologies.
  • Technical Context: The dispute centers on the fundamental architecture of RF transceivers, which are essential components for enabling wireless communication in nearly all modern mobile devices.
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint notes a prior lawsuit filed in 2011 where a jury found several different ParkerVision down-conversion patents to be valid and infringed by Qualcomm. It also references licensing negotiations between ParkerVision and Qualcomm that occurred from 1998-1999 but did not result in an agreement. For certain patents, the complaint alleges Qualcomm had knowledge due to citing them as prior art during its own patent prosecution.

Case Timeline

Date Event
1998-10-21 Earliest Priority Date ('940, '902, '836, '372, '508, '246, '907, '177, '116 Patents)
1999-03-03 Earliest Priority Date ('549 Patent)
1999-05-01 ParkerVision and Qualcomm allegedly meet to discuss pending patent applications
2000-07-18 U.S. Patent No. 6,091,940 Issued
2003-06-17 U.S. Patent No. 6,580,902 Issued
2004-03-09 U.S. Patent No. 6,704,549 Issued
2004-09-09 Earliest Priority Date ('012 Patent)
2005-03-29 U.S. Patent No. 6,873,836 Issued
2006-05-02 U.S. Patent No. 7,039,372 Issued
2006-05-23 U.S. Patent No. 7,050,508 Issued
2007-03-20 U.S. Patent No. 7,194,246 Issued
2007-05-15 U.S. Patent No. 7,218,907 Issued
2010-09-01 Qualcomm allegedly had knowledge of '372 Patent via citation
2011-01-04 U.S. Patent No. 7,865,177 Issued
2011-02-01 Qualcomm allegedly had knowledge of '836 Patent via citation
2011-06-21 U.S. Patent No. 7,966,012 Issued
2011-07-20 ParkerVision files prior lawsuit against Qualcomm
2012-05-29 U.S. Patent No. 8,190,116 Issued
2013-10-01 Jury verdict in prior litigation between ParkerVision and Qualcomm
2014-08-21 Complaint Filing Date

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 6,091,940 - "Method and System for Frequency Up-conversion," issued July 18, 2000.

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent addresses the general field of frequency up-conversion, where a lower-frequency information signal (baseband) is modulated onto a higher-frequency carrier signal for transmission. Conventional methods for accomplishing this are described, implying a need for alternative, potentially more efficient, approaches. (’940 Patent, col. 1:21-31).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention proposes an up-conversion method that uses a stable, low-frequency oscillating signal as a reference. This reference signal is modulated by an information signal. The resulting modulated signal then controls a switch that gates a bias signal, which creates a "harmonically rich" periodic waveform (e.g., a square wave). A filter is then used to select one of these higher-frequency harmonics as the desired output signal for transmission. (’940 Patent, Abstract; Fig. 12). This architecture avoids the need for a high-frequency, high-power primary oscillator.
  • Technical Importance: By generating high-frequency signals from harmonics of a stable low-frequency source, this technique presented a path toward more power-efficient and highly integrable RF transmitters for wireless devices. (Compl. ¶¶1, 3).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts infringement of one or more unspecified claims (Compl. ¶42). Independent claim 1 is representative of the apparatus claims.
  • Essential elements of independent claim 1 include:
    • A first switch module receiving a first modulated oscillating signal and a first bias signal.
    • The first switch module gates the bias signal to create a first periodic signal with harmonics.
    • A second switch module receiving a second modulated oscillating signal and a second bias signal.
    • The second switch module gates the second bias signal to create a second periodic signal with harmonics.
    • A summer to combine the first and second periodic signals into a combined signal.
    • A filter to isolate at least one harmonic from the combined signal.
  • The complaint reserves the right to assert additional claims.

U.S. Patent No. 6,580,902 - "Frequency Translation Using Optimized Switch Structures," issued June 17, 2003.

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent describes conventional radio receivers as requiring numerous frequency-dependent components like mixers, filters, and oscillators. This makes them expensive, power-intensive, and difficult to adapt for different frequency bands, a significant drawback for multi-band devices. (’902 Patent, col. 1:19-22, col. 2:25-41).
  • The Patented Solution: The patent discloses a "universal" down-conversion method based on aliasing. Instead of mixing the incoming high-frequency signal with another high-frequency signal, the invention uses a lower-frequency "aliasing signal" to either under-sample the incoming signal or transfer energy from it. This process directly translates the high-frequency signal to a lower intermediate frequency or to baseband, greatly simplifying the receiver architecture. (’902 Patent, Abstract; col. 3:9-24).
  • Technical Importance: This approach enabled the design of RF receivers with fewer components, lower power consumption, and greater flexibility to operate across a wide range of frequencies, contributing to the feasibility of smaller and more efficient mobile devices. (Compl. ¶3; ’902 Patent, col. 2:42-53).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts infringement of one or more unspecified claims (Compl. ¶89). Independent claim 1 is representative of the apparatus claims.
  • Essential elements of independent claim 1 include:
    • An energy transfer module comprising a switch module and an energy storage module.
    • The energy transfer module samples an electromagnetic signal at an energy transfer rate to obtain sampled energy.
    • A down-converted signal is generated from this sampled energy.
    • The module includes transistors with a common control port that accepts the energy transfer signal.
  • The complaint reserves the right to assert additional claims.

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 6,704,549

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 6,704,549, "Multi-mode, Multi-band Communication System," issued March 9, 2004.
  • Technology Synopsis: Discloses a transmission system for a multi-mode, multi-band communication device. The system uses a "universal frequency translator (UFT)" to implement the up-conversion section, allowing a single architecture to handle multiple transmission frequencies and modulation schemes. (’549 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: One or more unspecified claims. (Compl. ¶136).
  • Accused Features: Devices capable of modulating an information signal to create an "angle modulated harmonically rich signal." (Compl. ¶136).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 6,873,836

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 6,873,836, "Universal Platform Module and Methods and Apparatus Relating thereto Enabled by Universal Frequency Translation Technology," issued March 29, 2005.
  • Technology Synopsis: Describes a "universal platform module" (UPM) that allows a single communication device to operate on multiple protocols or standards (e.g., cellular, WLAN). The UPM incorporates a universal frequency translation (UFT) module for receiving and/or transmitting signals across these different networks. (’836 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: One or more unspecified claims. (Compl. ¶184).
  • Accused Features: Combination RF transceiver-baseband chips and other devices capable of operation on multiple standards and/or protocols. (Compl. ¶184).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 7,039,372

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 7,039,372, "Method and System for Frequency Up-conversion with Modulation Embodiments," issued May 2, 2006.
  • Technology Synopsis: Details a method for up-converting a signal wherein information is gated at a frequency that is a sub-harmonic of the desired output signal. The invention describes multiple modulation embodiments, including amplitude modulation (AM), frequency modulation (FM), and phase modulation (PM), accomplished by controlling a switching operation. (’372 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: One or more unspecified claims. (Compl. ¶232).
  • Accused Features: Devices capable of up-converting and modulating an information signal. (Compl. ¶232).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 7,050,508

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 7,050,508, "Method and System for Frequency Up-conversion with a Variety of Transmitter Configurations," issued May 23, 2006.
  • Technology Synopsis: Describes an up-conversion method where an information signal is gated at a sub-harmonic of the desired output frequency. The patent focuses on various transmitter configurations, including embodiments integrated into half-duplex and full-duplex transceivers. (’508 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: One or more unspecified claims. (Compl. ¶280).
  • Accused Features: Devices capable of up-converting a lower-frequency signal to a higher-frequency signal. (Compl. ¶280).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 7,194,246

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 7,194,246, "Methods and Systems For Down-converting A Signal Using A Complementary Transistor Structure," issued March 20, 2007.
  • Technology Synopsis: Discloses a method for down-converting an electromagnetic signal by aliasing the signal with a complementary transistor structure. The use of a complementary structure (e.g., both n-channel and p-channel FETs) is intended to improve dynamic range and reduce distortion during the down-conversion process. (’246 Patent, Abstract; col. 108:30-40).
  • Asserted Claims: One or more unspecified claims. (Compl. ¶328).
  • Accused Features: Devices capable of down-converting a higher-frequency signal to a lower-frequency signal. (Compl. ¶328).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 7,218,907

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 7,218,907, "Method And Circuit For Down-converting A Signal," issued May 15, 2007.
  • Technology Synopsis: Relates to methods and systems for down-converting an electromagnetic (EM) signal by aliasing. The invention covers both under-sampling the EM signal and transferring energy from the EM signal at an aliasing rate to achieve down-conversion to an intermediate frequency or directly to baseband. (’907 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: One or more unspecified claims. (Compl. ¶378).
  • Accused Features: Devices capable of down-converting a higher-frequency signal to a lower-frequency signal. (Compl. ¶378).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 7,865,177

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 7,865,177, "Method And System For Down-converting An Electromagnetic Signal, And Transforms For Same, And Aperture Relationships," issued January 4, 2011.
  • Technology Synopsis: Describes down-converting an EM signal by performing a matched filtering/correlating operation on approximate half cycles of the carrier signal. This operation is performed at a sub-harmonic rate of the carrier, and the results are accumulated to form the down-converted signal, relating the process to mathematical transforms. (’177 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: One or more unspecified claims. (Compl. ¶425).
  • Accused Features: Devices capable of down-converting a higher-frequency signal to a lower-frequency signal. (Compl. ¶425).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 7,966,012

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 7,966,012, "Wireless Protocol Converter," issued June 21, 2011.
  • Technology Synopsis: Discloses a repeater station for interfacing between broadband wireless communication systems (e.g., cellular) and Local Area Network (LAN) systems. The station includes a protocol converter that translates between the protocol used by the broadband service and the protocol used by the LAN devices. (’012 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: One or more unspecified claims. (Compl. ¶473).
  • Accused Features: Chipsets and devices capable of interfacing between broadband wireless communication systems and LAN systems. (Compl. ¶473).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 8,190,116

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 8,190,116, "Methods and Systems for Down-converting a Signal Using a Complementary Transistor Structure," issued May 29, 2012.
  • Technology Synopsis: Discloses a circuit and method for down-converting an input signal using an energy transfer control signal comprised of a plurality of pulses. The invention utilizes a complementary transistor structure to under-sample the input signal, with the energy transfer control signal being less than twice the frequency of the input signal. (’116 Patent, Abstract; col. 131:25-39).
  • Asserted Claims: One or more unspecified claims. (Compl. ¶520).
  • Accused Features: Combination RF transceiver-baseband chips and devices capable of down-converting an input signal with an energy transfer control signal comprised of a plurality of pulses. (Compl. ¶520).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

Product Identification

  • The accused instrumentalities are integrated circuits (chips and chipsets) designed and sold by Qualcomm, and the consumer electronic devices that incorporate them, which are manufactured and sold by HTC and Samsung. (Compl. ¶¶22, 39). Specific accused Qualcomm products include, but are not limited to, the RTR8600, QTR8200, QSC6270, RTR6285, QSD8250, WCN3660, and MSM8960 chipsets. (Compl. ¶¶42, 89, 184, 473, 520). Downstream products include the HTC Evo 4G LTE, HTC Flyer, HTC Surround, Samsung Galaxy S3, Samsung Focus, and Samsung Stratosphere II. (Compl. ¶¶59, 74, 106, 121, 153, 168, 201, 216).

Functionality and Market Context

  • The accused Qualcomm products are RF transceivers and baseband processors that provide wireless communication capabilities. (Compl. ¶22). The complaint alleges these components perform the core functions of up-conversion for transmitting signals and down-conversion for receiving signals across various wireless standards (e.g., WCDMA). (Compl. ¶¶48, 95). The complaint alleges that these chips are key components in popular smartphones and tablets, and that HTC and Samsung are major customers of Qualcomm that incorporate these infringing chips into their widely sold mobile devices. (Compl. ¶¶3, 22). No probative visual evidence provided in complaint.

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

The complaint does not contain claim charts or provide a detailed mapping of accused product features to specific claim limitations. Instead, it makes narrative allegations that the accused products possess the general capability described by the patents. For instance, for the '940 patent, the complaint alleges Qualcomm products "are not limited to... any other Qualcomm device that is capable of up-conversion of a lower-frequency signal to a higher-frequency signal as claimed in the '940 patent" (Compl. ¶42). Similarly, for the '902 patent, infringement is alleged for any device "capable of down-conversion of a higher-frequency signal to a lower-frequency signal as claimed in the '902 patent" (Compl. ¶89).

  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Technical Questions: A primary evidentiary question will be whether the accused Qualcomm transceivers operate using the specific architectures claimed in the patents. For the up-conversion patents (e.g., '940), the question is whether the chips generate a harmonically rich signal by gating a bias or reference signal with a modulated low-frequency oscillator, and then filter a desired harmonic. For the down-conversion patents (e.g., '902), the question is whether the chips employ an "aliasing" or "energy transfer" technique using a sub-harmonic sampling signal, as opposed to a conventional heterodyne or direct-conversion architecture. The complaint provides no technical details on the internal operation of the accused chips.
    • Scope Questions: The analysis will likely focus on the proper construction of key claim terms. For example, a central question for the '940 patent will be whether the general function of up-converting a signal in the accused products meets the specific claim requirement of "gating a ... bias signal to create a ... periodic signal having a ... plurality of harmonics." For the '902 patent, a similar question arises as to whether the products' down-conversion method constitutes an "energy transfer module" that obtains "sampled energy" as claimed.

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

  • The Term: "gates said ... bias signal to create a ... periodic signal having a ... plurality of harmonics" (from '940 Patent, claim 1)
  • Context and Importance: This phrase describes the core mechanism of the claimed up-conversion invention. The infringement case for the ’940 patent may turn on whether the accused products' method of generating a high-frequency signal can be characterized as "gating a bias signal" to create harmonics, as opposed to using a more conventional voltage-controlled oscillator or mixer.
  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The abstract describes the up-conversion as being accomplished by "controlling a switch with an oscillating signal," where the switch "gates a reference signal." (’940 Patent, Abstract). Practitioners may argue this language supports a broad interpretation covering various switched-mode methods of generating harmonics.
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The detailed description and figures (e.g., FIG. 16, FIG. 28A) consistently depict a specific circuit topology where a switch (1614, 2816) directly connects an information/bias signal to an output path, controlled by an oscillating signal. (’940 Patent, col. 22:37-54; col. 33:20-33). This may support a narrower construction limited to this architecture.
  • The Term: "energy transfer module sampling the electromagnetic signal at an energy transfer rate to obtain sampled energy" (from '902 Patent, claim 1)
  • Context and Importance: This term is central to distinguishing the patented invention from conventional down-converters that rely on mixing or simple voltage sampling. The infringement analysis for the ’902 patent will likely depend on whether the accused products' circuits can be shown to "transfer energy" from the input signal to an "energy storage module," rather than merely sampling its voltage.
  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The patent frequently uses "aliasing," "under-sampling," and "energy transfer" in related contexts, suggesting they describe a general principle of sub-Nyquist sampling for down-conversion. (’902 Patent, col. 3:9-17). This may support construing the term to cover a wide range of sub-sampling techniques.
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The specification explicitly distinguishes between down-conversion by "under-sampling" and down-conversion by "transferring energy," stating the latter "transfers non-negligible amounts of energy" and provides benefits for driving low-impedance loads. (’902 Patent, col. 66:35-51). This suggests "energy transfer" is a specific technique, not a generic term for all sub-sampling, potentially narrowing the claim scope to circuits that physically store and transfer charge.

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The complaint alleges both induced and contributory infringement against all Defendants for all asserted patents. The theory of inducement against Qualcomm is that it provides infringing chipsets to its customers (HTC and Samsung) with knowledge and intent that they will be incorporated into end-user products and used in an infringing manner. (Compl. ¶¶44-48). The theory against HTC and Samsung is that they provide end-user products containing the accused chips along with instructions and user manuals that encourage infringing use (e.g., making calls or using data on a WCDMA network). (Compl. ¶¶60-64, 75-78).
  • Willful Infringement: The complaint alleges willful infringement against Qualcomm for at least the '940, '902, '549, '836, and '372 patents. The allegations are based on alleged pre-suit knowledge derived from several sources: direct licensing negotiations in 1999 regarding the application that led to the '940 patent (Compl. ¶46); knowledge of related patents from prior litigation (Compl. ¶¶93, 140); and Qualcomm's own citation to the '836 and '372 patents as prior art during the prosecution of its own patents. (Compl. ¶¶188, 236).

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

  • A central issue will be one of technical mechanism: Does the evidence regarding the architecture of the accused Qualcomm chips show that they operate by generating harmonics via a gated reference signal for up-conversion and by transferring energy via sub-harmonic sampling for down-conversion, as specifically claimed, or do they employ fundamentally different, conventional RF techniques?
  • A second key issue will be one of claim construction: Can the claim terms, such as "gates said bias signal" and "energy transfer module," which are described with specific circuit embodiments in the patents, be interpreted broadly enough to read on the highly integrated and complex functions of modern wireless transceivers?
  • Finally, a critical question for willfulness and enhanced damages will be scienter: Can ParkerVision prove that Qualcomm's alleged pre-suit knowledge from prior litigation, licensing discussions, and its own patent prosecution activity demonstrates objective recklessness, or will Qualcomm be able to establish a good-faith belief that its products did not infringe or that the patents were invalid?