DCT

0:23-cv-03690

National Products Inc v. Havis Inc

Log In

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 0:23-cv-03690, D. Minn., 11/30/2023
  • Venue Allegations: Plaintiff alleges venue is proper in the District of Minnesota because Defendant Havis maintains a regular and established place of business in Burnsville, Minnesota, described as a "Corporate Office, Product Development Center & Manufacturing Plant," and employs personnel related to the accused products within the district.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s powered docking systems and protective cases for enterprise tablets infringe four patents related to protective sleeves with integrated electrical adapters that facilitate docking.
  • Technical Context: The technology addresses protective cases for portable electronic devices, such as tablets, that integrate electrical contacts, enabling the device to be docked for charging and data transfer without being removed from its protective case.
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint alleges that Plaintiff provided Defendant with pre-suit notice of infringement for all four asserted patents via letters dated March 3, 2023, and June 30, 2023, which forms the basis for the allegations of willful infringement.

Case Timeline

Date Event
2014-02-24 Earliest Priority Date (’639, ’535, ’275, ’458 Patents)
2017-03-21 U.S. Patent No. 9,602,639 Issues
2017-04-25 U.S. Patent No. 9,632,535 Issues
2020-09-15 U.S. Patent No. 10,778,275 Issues
2021-11-02 U.S. Patent No. 11,165,458 Issues
2023-03-03 Alleged Notice of Infringement ('275 & '458 Patents)
2023-06-30 Alleged Notice of Infringement ('639 & '535 Patents)
2023-11-30 Complaint Filed

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 9,602,639 - "Docking Sleeve With Electrical Adapter"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,602,639, "Docking Sleeve With Electrical Adapter," issued March 21, 2017.
  • The Invention Explained:
    • Problem Addressed: The patent describes the limitation of known protective covers, or "skins," for portable electronic devices, which are generally not designed for docking and must be removed for the device to be charged or connected to other peripherals via a docking station (’639 Patent, col. 1:26-36).
    • The Patented Solution: The invention is a two-part system comprising a protective cover for an electronic device and a corresponding docking cradle. The cover integrates an electrical adapter with an internal plug to connect to the device's port and external contacts, allowing the protected device to be placed directly into the docking cradle to establish an electrical connection without removing the cover (’639 Patent, col. 2:48-67). The docking cradle features a "movable arm" to secure the device within the cradle (’639 Patent, Fig. 52A-52F).
    • Technical Importance: This approach allows portable electronics to remain protected in rugged environments (e.g., vehicles, warehouses) while retaining the convenience and functionality of drop-in docking for charging and data transfer.
  • Key Claims at a Glance:
    • The complaint asserts independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶28).
    • Claim 1 requires a docking system comprising:
      • A protective cover with a flexible shell, an adapter with a male plug and an external contactor.
      • A docking cradle configured to receive the cover, with a tray, a movable arm, and a docking connector with contacts to connect with the cover's contactor.
      • The movable arm is configured for movement between an extended position and a close position.
    • The complaint reserves the right to assert other claims, including dependent claims (Compl. ¶¶ 34-37).

U.S. Patent No. 9,632,535 - "Docking Sleeve With Electrical Adapter"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,632,535, "Docking Sleeve With Electrical Adapter," issued April 25, 2017.
  • The Invention Explained:
    • Problem Addressed: The patent addresses the same general problem as the ’639 Patent: the inability of standard protective skins to accommodate docking stations (’535 Patent, col. 1:26-36).
    • The Patented Solution: This patent also discloses a system of a protective skin and a docking cradle. The claims focus on specific mechanical and electrical interface features. The skin includes a "male positioning interface" (such as a raised rim or "dam") around the external electrical contacts, which physically mates with a corresponding "female base receiver" on the docking cradle to ensure proper alignment and a secure connection (’535 Patent, col. 2:54-67; Fig. 8).
    • Technical Importance: The claimed positioning interface provides a robust and reliable physical guide for mating the device with the dock, which is critical in fast-paced or low-visibility environments where precise alignment may be difficult.
  • Key Claims at a Glance:
    • The complaint asserts independent claim 19 (Compl. ¶42).
    • Claim 19 requires a docking system comprising:
      • A protective skin with a flexible shell, an adapter with a male plug and an external contactor.
      • A "male positioning interface" on the skin defining a rim around the contactor.
      • A docking cradle with a tray configured to receive the skin and a docking connector with contacts.
      • The docking connector includes a "female base receiver" configured to mate with the skin's positioning interface.
    • The complaint reserves the right to assert other claims, including dependent claims (Compl. ¶¶ 48-51).

U.S. Patent No. 10,778,275 - "Docking Sleeve With Electrical Adapter"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 10,778,275, "Docking Sleeve With Electrical Adapter," issued September 15, 2020.
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent describes a protective arrangement where a cover has a male plug that extends into its interior cavity to mate with an electronic device, and an external contactor positioned over the device's back face. The corresponding docking system has a connector with biasing electrical contacts, such as "spring-loaded pogo pins," arranged in a single line to mate with the cover's contactor (’275 Patent, Abstract; col. 33:57-64).
  • Asserted Claims: Claims 8-11, with claim 8 being independent (Compl. ¶56).
  • Accused Features: The Havis Tablet Docking Stations and Tablet Cases are accused of infringing. The complaint specifically points to the use of "spring-loaded pogo pins" arranged in a single line on the docking station (Compl. ¶60).

U.S. Patent No. 11,165,458 - "Docking Sleeve with Electrical Adapter"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 11,165,458, "Docking Sleeve with Electrical Adapter," issued November 2, 2021.
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent claims a protective arrangement with a removable cover containing an adapter. A key feature is the geometric relationship between the adapter's components: the male plug extends in a "longitudinal direction" into the cover, while the external electrical contacts are arranged on a "lateral surface" of the contactor, with the longitudinal direction of the plug being "perpendicular to the lateral surface of the contactor" (’458 Patent, col. 34:18-29).
  • Asserted Claims: Claim 20, which is independent (Compl. ¶71).
  • Accused Features: The powered docking systems used with Zebra enterprise tablets, including the Zebra Tablet Mounts, are accused of infringing (Compl. ¶71). The complaint alleges these systems embody the claimed perpendicular orientation of the internal plug relative to the external contacts (Compl. ¶74).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

  • Product Identification: The complaint identifies two sets of accused products: (1) for the ’639, ’535, and ’458 patents, "powered docking systems for and used with Zebra ET50/51 and/or ET55/56 enterprise tablets with the rugged frame option, including but not limited to the Zebra Tablet Mounts" (Compl. ¶28); and (2) for the ’275 patent, "Havis Tablet Docking Stations, Tablet Cases, and Havis Docking Kits" (Compl. ¶56).
  • Functionality and Market Context: The accused instrumentalities comprise a two-part system: a protective case or rugged frame that encloses a tablet, and a docking station that receives the cased tablet (Compl. ¶¶30-33, 58-62). The complaint alleges the rugged frame includes an integrated connector that passes power and data to external contacts on the frame's exterior (Compl. ¶¶31, 45, 74). The docking station has corresponding contacts, allowing a user to dock the tablet for charging and data transfer without removing it from the protective frame (Compl. ¶¶33, 47, 76). The complaint includes an image from a Zebra marketing guide depicting the "Rugged Frames" as part of an "Accessory Ecosystem" for enterprise tablets (Compl. p. 10).

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

9,602,639 Patent Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 1) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
A docking system...comprising: a protective cover...comprising: a flexible protective shell... The system includes a protective cover, described as a "rugged frame option," with a flexible shell made to receive a Zebra tablet. ¶29, 31 col. 7:10-15
an adapter fixedly positioned in the shell, the adapter comprising a male plug...and a contactor... The protective cover contains an adapter fixedly positioned in the shell with a male plug for the tablet's socket and an external contactor. ¶31 col. 7:48-56
a docking cradle...comprising: a tray configured to receive the cover... The accused Zebra Tablet Mounts include a docking cradle with a tray configured to receive the tablet inside its protective cover. ¶33 col. 8:35-37
a movable arm coupled to the tray... The docking cradle is alleged to have a movable arm that functions as a latching mechanism. ¶33 col. 5:27-29
wherein the movable arm is configured and arranged for movement between an extended position...and a close position... A diagram in a Havis document, reproduced in the complaint, depicts the movable arm moving between "Unlatched" (extended) and "Latched" (close) positions to secure the device. ¶33, p. 12 col. 5:30-34
and a docking connector...comprising a plurality of contacts positioned to connect with...the contactor... The docking cradle has a docking connector with contacts that align and connect with the contacts on the protective cover's contactor. ¶33 col. 8:37-41
  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Scope Questions: A central question may be whether the latching mechanism on the accused Havis docking cradle constitutes a "movable arm" as that term is used in the patent. The complaint provides a visual depicting "Latched" and "Unlatched" states, which may support the allegation that the feature is "movable...between an extended position...and a close position" (Compl. p. 12). The construction of "movable arm" will likely be a key dispute.
    • Technical Questions: The complaint alleges the protective shell is "flexible" (Compl. ¶31). The degree of flexibility of the accused "rugged frame" and whether it meets the claim limitation as understood in the context of the patent specification may become a point of factual dispute.

9,632,535 Patent Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 19) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
A docking system...comprising: a protective skin...comprising a flexible protective shell... The system includes a protective skin, the "rugged frame option," which has a flexible shell for a Zebra tablet. ¶43, 45 col. 18:24-27
an adapter fixedly positioned in the shell...comprising a male plug...and a contactor... The protective skin contains a fixed adapter with an internal male plug and an external contactor. ¶45 col. 18:31-38
and a positioning interface disposed on the shell and defining a rim around the contactor of the adapter to guide proper mating... The protective skin has a positioning interface that forms a rim around the contactor to guide mating with an external connector. ¶45 col. 18:39-43
a docking cradle...comprising: a tray configured to receive the skin; and a docking connector... The Zebra Tablet Mount includes a docking cradle with a tray that receives the protective skin and a docking connector. ¶47 col. 18:44-47
the docking connector comprising...a female base receiver...configured to mate with the male positioning interface of the skin... The docking connector is alleged to have a female base receiver that mates with the positioning interface on the skin. ¶47 col. 18:48-52
  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Scope Questions: The analysis may focus on whether the physical structures on the accused rugged frame and docking station meet the definitions of a "male positioning interface" and a "female base receiver." The complaint does not provide specific structural details for these accused features beyond general allegations, which suggests this could be a point of discovery and expert testimony.
    • Technical Questions: The complaint alleges that the accused skin has a positioning interface that "defin[es] a rim around the contactor" (Compl. ¶45). Evidence will be needed to establish the existence and function of this specific structure on the accused rugged frames and how it interacts with the docking cradle to "guide proper mating."

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

  • The Term: "movable arm" (’639 Patent, Claim 1)

    • Context and Importance: This term is a primary structural element of the claimed docking cradle, responsible for securing the device. Its construction will be critical to determining whether the latching mechanism of the accused Havis dock, which the complaint shows in "Latched" and "Unlatched" states, infringes (Compl. p. 12). Practitioners may focus on whether the term requires a specific structure shown in the patent's embodiments or can be construed more broadly to cover any movable latching component.
    • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
      • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The claim language itself requires only that the "arm" be "movable" and "coupled to the tray." The specification describes the function as providing a "compression component" to press the device into the dock (’639 Patent, col. 8:54-58), which could support reading the term on various latching structures that perform this function.
      • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The detailed description and figures show specific embodiments of a pivoting arm structure (e.g., ’639 Patent, Fig. 52A, element 43). A defendant may argue that the term should be limited to these disclosed structures or their equivalents, potentially distinguishing it from the accused product's mechanism.

  • The Term: "positioning interface" (’535 Patent, Claim 19)

    • Context and Importance: This term, along with the corresponding "female base receiver," defines the key alignment mechanism between the protective skin and the docking cradle. The infringement analysis for the ’535 Patent will depend heavily on whether the accused products' alignment features fall within the scope of this term.
    • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
      • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The claim describes the term functionally, as a structure "to guide proper mating." This could support a broad construction covering any set of complementary physical features that achieve this alignment function.
      • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The specification provides a specific example of the positioning interface as a "locator dam" that forms a "rim around the contactor" and nests within a corresponding socket (’535 Patent, col. 13:51-61; col. 18:39-43). Embodiments like Figure 8 (element 132) show this as a distinct, raised structure. A defendant may argue the term is limited to this "dam"-like embodiment, raising the question of whether the accused product's alignment features are structurally equivalent.

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The complaint alleges induced infringement for all four patents. The alleged acts of inducement include providing customers with the accused products and intending them to be used in an infringing manner, advertising the products for their intended use, offering technical support, and providing instructions and user manuals that direct customers to combine the components (e.g., the protective case and the docking station) in an infringing manner (Compl. ¶¶ 34, 48, 63, 77).
  • Willful Infringement: The complaint alleges willful infringement for all four patents. The allegations are based on alleged actual knowledge of the patents and their infringement since at least March 3, 2023 (for the ’275 and ’458 patents) and June 30, 2023 (for the ’639 and ’535 patents), when Plaintiff allegedly sent notice letters to Defendant (Compl. ¶¶ 39, 53, 68, 82).

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

  • A core issue will be one of definitional scope: can the term "movable arm," as described in the ’639 Patent, be construed to cover the latching mechanism on the accused Havis docking station? The outcome will depend on whether the term is interpreted broadly based on its function or limited to the specific pivoting structures shown in the patent's figures.
  • A second key issue will be one of structural correspondence: do the physical alignment features of the accused rugged frames and docking stations constitute a "male positioning interface" that "defin[es] a rim" and a corresponding "female base receiver" as required by the ’535 Patent? This will likely require detailed factual analysis of the accused products' geometry and comparison to the patent's specific embodiments.
  • A central evidentiary question will concern functionality: does the alleged perpendicular arrangement between the internal plug and external contacts in the accused products for the '458 patent align with the specific geometric and functional requirements of claim 20? This question will require technical evidence demonstrating the orientation and operation of the components within the accused rugged frames.