DCT

1:16-cv-09826

Rovi Guides Inc v. Comcast Corp

Log In

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 2:16-cv-00322, E.D. Tex., 04/25/2016
  • Venue Allegations: Plaintiff alleges venue is proper in the Eastern District of Texas because Defendants conduct continuous and systematic business in the district, including providing the accused infringing products and services to residents, employing individuals, and maintaining offices and facilities within the district.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s Comcast X1 interactive program guide platform and associated set-top boxes infringe seven patents related to interactive television program guides, remote DVR functionality, multi-tuner management, and whole-home DVR systems.
  • Technical Context: The technology at issue involves interactive program guides (IPGs), which are critical user-facing software features in the competitive pay-television and streaming media markets for content discovery and management.
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint alleges that Comcast was a licensee to Rovi’s patent portfolio under an agreement that expired on March 31, 2016, less than a month before this suit was filed. Plaintiff also alleges it provided detailed claim charts to Comcast during unsuccessful renewal negotiations, which may be relevant to allegations of pre-suit knowledge and willful infringement.

Case Timeline

Date Event
1993-09-09 U.S. Patent No. 6,418,556 Priority Date
1998-06-16 U.S. Patent No. 8,621,512 Priority Date
1998-07-17 U.S. Patent Nos. 8,006,263, 8,578,413, and 8,046,801 Priority Date
1998-07-29 U.S. Patent No. 8,566,871 Priority Date
2001-02-21 U.S. Patent No. 8,768,147 Priority Date
2002-07-09 U.S. Patent No. 6,418,556 Issued
2004-01-01 Approx. date Comcast entered into license agreement with Rovi forerunner Gemstar
2011-08-23 U.S. Patent No. 8,006,263 Issued
2011-11-01 U.S. Patent No. 8,046,801 Issued
2012-01-01 Comcast launched the X1 IPG Product
2013-11-05 U.S. Patent No. 8,578,413 Issued
2014-01-01 U.S. Patent No. 8,621,512 Issued
2014-01-01 Comcast introduced the next generation of its X1 IPG Product
2014-05-20 U.S. Patent No. 8,566,871 Issued
2014-06-24 U.S. Patent No. 8,768,147 Issued
2016-03-31 Comcast’s license to Rovi technology expired
2016-04-25 Complaint Filing Date

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 8,006,263 - "Interactive Television Program Guide With Remote Access"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 8,006,263, “Interactive Television Program Guide With Remote Access,” issued August 23, 2011.
  • The Invention Explained:
    • Problem Addressed: The patent’s background section describes that conventional interactive program guides (IPGs) required a user to be physically present at home to access features like setting program reminders or scheduling recordings (Compl. ¶151; ’263 Patent, col. 2:19-22).
    • The Patented Solution: The invention is a system architecture that connects a remote access device (e.g., a personal computer or PDA) to a user’s local, in-home television equipment over a remote link, such as the Internet (’263 Patent, Abstract). This connection allows a user to perform program guide functions, such as scheduling a recording on their home DVR, from a remote location like their workplace (Compl. ¶¶ 124, 131; ’263 Patent, col. 11:54-60). The system can be configured in various ways, including a client-server model where the remote device communicates with a program guide server that in turn interacts with the user's home equipment (Compl. ¶127; ’263 Patent, Fig. 2d).
    • Technical Importance: The technology untethered program guide management from the physical television set, enabling users to control their home media experience from anywhere with an internet-connected device (Compl. ¶135).
  • Key Claims at a Glance:
    • The complaint asserts independent method claim 14 (Compl. ¶154).
    • The essential elements of claim 14 include:
      • Implementing a local interactive television program guide on local equipment and a remote guide on a remote access device.
      • Communicating between the local and remote guides via an Internet communications path.
      • Displaying program listings on the remote device based on a user profile that is stored remotely from the remote access device.
      • Receiving a user's selection of a program for recording on the remote device.
      • Communicating the user's selection from the remote guide to the local guide to schedule the recording.

U.S. Patent No. 8,578,413 - "Interactive Television Program Guide With Remote Access"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 8,578,413, “Interactive Television Program Guide With Remote Access,” issued November 5, 2013.
  • The Invention Explained:
    • Problem Addressed: The complaint notes this patent shares a substantially common specification with the ’263 Patent and is directed to the same technical problem: the inability of users to access their in-home program guide features from a remote location (Compl. ¶¶ 177-178).
    • The Patented Solution: The invention is a system, rather than a method, for providing remote access to an interactive program guide. It comprises local program guide equipment (e.g., a set-top box), a remote access device (e.g., a smartphone), and an Internet communications path enabling the two to communicate, allowing the user to remotely schedule a recording on the local equipment (’413 Patent, Abstract).
    • Technical Importance: As with the ’263 Patent, this technology enabled remote management of a user's home television system (Compl. ¶178).
  • Key Claims at a Glance:
    • The complaint asserts independent system claim 1 (Compl. ¶179).
    • The essential elements of claim 1 include:
      • Local interactive television program guide equipment implementing a local guide.
      • A remote interactive television program guide access device implementing a remote guide.
      • An Internet communications path for communication between the local and remote guides.
      • The remote guide is operative to display program listings based on a user profile stored remotely from the access device.
      • The remote guide is operative to receive a user selection for recording and communicate that selection to the local guide to schedule the recording.

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 8,046,801

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 8,046,801, "Interactive Television Program Guide With Remote Access," issued November 1, 2011.
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent, which shares a common specification with the ’263 Patent, addresses limitations in data storage and processing power on remote devices (Compl. ¶¶ 202, 205). The invention provides for a remote device to generate its display based on program guide information received from the local guide via the Internet, reducing the amount of data that must be stored on the remote device itself (Compl. ¶203; ’801 Patent, col. 40:10-13).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 51 is asserted (Compl. ¶206).
  • Accused Features: The complaint alleges infringement by the Accused DVR Products and the associated Xfinity TV Remote App (Compl. ¶206).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 8,621,512

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 8,621,512, "Interactive Television Program Guide with Simultaneous Watch and Record Capabilities," issued January 1, 2014.
  • Technology Synopsis: The patent addresses conflicts that arise in operating multi-tuner set-top boxes, where a user may be unable to record a program if all tuners are occupied (e.g., one for viewing, one for a picture-in-picture function) (Compl. ¶230; ’512 Patent, col. 1:35-43). The invention is a program guide that can allocate tuners and resolve such conflicts by displaying an alert that gives the user an opportunity to cancel a secondary function to free up a tuner for a requested recording (Compl. ¶¶ 239-240; ’512 Patent, col. 9:9-24).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 13 is asserted (Compl. ¶250).
  • Accused Features: The complaint alleges infringement by the Accused DVR and Non-DVR Products, which comprise multiple tuners (Compl. ¶250).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 8,768,147

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 8,768,147, "Systems and Methods for Interactive Program Guides with Personal Video Recording Features," issued June 24, 2014.
  • Technology Synopsis: The patent addresses a limitation of early personal video recorders (PVRs), where a program buffer that allows for pausing or rewinding live TV is lost when the user changes the channel (Compl. ¶275; ’147 Patent, col. 1:54-57). The invention uses multiple tuners to buffer programs on different channels in parallel, allowing a user to switch between channels and still rewind to watch missed content on the previous channel (Compl. ¶¶ 276, 281; ’147 Patent, col. 73:8-27).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 11 is asserted (Compl. ¶292).
  • Accused Features: The complaint alleges infringement by Accused DVR Products that have a "SWAP BETWEEN TWO CHANNELS" feature (Compl. ¶298).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 8,566,871

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 8,566,871, "Multiple Interactive Electronic Program Guide System and Methods," issued May 20, 2014.
  • Technology Synopsis: The patent addresses the cost and inconvenience of managing multiple set-top boxes for multiple televisions in a single household, particularly for implementing centralized parental controls (Compl. ¶¶ 314-315; ’871 Patent, col. 1:43-52). The invention describes a single set-top box that serves multiple television receivers, with each receiver having its own instance of an interactive program guide (IPG), while all IPG instances share a common database for settings like parental controls and custom channel lists (Compl. ¶¶ 316, 323; ’871 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 12 is asserted (Compl. ¶334).
  • Accused Features: The complaint alleges infringement by Comcast’s AnyRoom® DVR feature (Compl. ¶¶ 334, 340).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 6,418,556

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 6,418,556, "Electronic Television Program Guide Schedule System and Method," issued July 9, 2002.
  • Technology Synopsis: The patent addresses the shortcomings of early, cumbersome electronic program guides that lacked overlay capabilities and forced users to guess what program was airing when "channel surfing" (Compl. ¶¶ 358-359; ’556 Patent, col. 1:28-42, 2:42-58). The invention is a system that receives program schedule information and displays a portion of it in an "overlaying relationship with a television program appearing on a television channel" (Compl. ¶357; ’556 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 2 is asserted (Compl. ¶373).
  • Accused Features: The complaint alleges infringement by Accused DVR and Non-DVR Products that are designed to be used with Comcast’s "Mini Guide" feature (Compl. ¶373).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

Product Identification

The core accused instrumentalities are Comcast’s Xfinity television services, its X1 IPG Product software platform, and the associated hardware, including numerous models of DVR and non-DVR set-top boxes manufactured by Defendants Arris and Technicolor (Compl. ¶¶ 1, 38-39). The allegations also target specific software features, such as the Xfinity TV Remote App, the AnyRoom® DVR feature, the "SWAP BETWEEN TWO CHANNELS" feature, and the "Mini Guide" (Compl. ¶¶ 154, 340, 298, 373).

Functionality and Market Context

The complaint describes the X1 IPG Product as a "cloud-enabled video platform" that integrates television and Internet features to provide advanced search, personalized recommendations, and access across multiple screens (Compl. ¶¶ 70, 76). The complaint alleges that Comcast markets the X1 platform as a key differentiator in a "highly competitive marketplace" (Compl. ¶74). The platform's functionality is alleged to include remote DVR scheduling via a mobile app, whole-home DVR access, parallel channel buffering, and an on-screen overlay guide (Compl. ¶¶ 160, 340, 298, 379). The complaint provides a screenshot of a non-interactive "Prevue Channel" guide to illustrate the state of the art at the time of the '263 patent's invention (Compl. ¶147). This visual is used to contrast the limited functionality of prior art guides with the interactive and remote-access features of the patented inventions and, by extension, the accused products (Compl. ¶147).

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

U.S. Patent No. 8,006,263 Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 14) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
A method for providing remote access to an interactive television program guide... Defendants provide a system that allows remote access to program guide functions (Compl. ¶154). ¶154 col. 2:23-28
implementing a local interactive television program guide on local interactive television program guide equipment... The Comcast X1 IPG is implemented on the Accused DVR Products (set-top boxes) located in a user's home (Compl. ¶154). ¶154 col. 4:57-61
implementing a remote interactive television program guide on a remote interactive television program guide access device... The Xfinity TV Remote App is a mobile IPG implemented on remote devices such as smartphones or tablets (Compl. ¶154). ¶154 col. 9:43-49
communicating between the local... guide and the remote... guide via an Internet communications path... The remote app communicates with the in-home X1 system over the Internet to perform guide functions (Compl. ¶154). ¶154 col. 10:29-40
displaying program listings on the remote... access device based on a user profile that is stored remotely from the remote... access device... The remote app displays program listings based on user-specific data and preferences stored on Comcast's servers, which are remote from the user's mobile device (Compl. ¶¶ 152, 154). ¶154 col. 17:4-9
receiving a user selection of a program for recording... The remote app allows a user to select a program to record on their DVR (Compl. ¶160). ¶160 col. 11:54-60
in response to the user selection, communicating the user selection from the remote... guide to the local... guide to schedule the recording of the program. The remote app communicates the selected program to the in-home X1 system, which then schedules the recording on the user's DVR (Compl. ¶160). ¶160 col. 12:25-29

U.S. Patent No. 8,578,413 Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 1) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
A system for providing remote access..., the system comprising: Defendants provide a system that allows remote access to program guide functions (Compl. ¶179). ¶179 col. 2:23-28
local interactive television program guide equipment on which a local interactive television program guide is implemented; The Accused DVR Products (set-top boxes) located in a user's home implement the local X1 IPG (Compl. ¶179). ¶179 col. 4:57-61
a remote interactive television program guide access device on which a remote interactive television program guide is implemented; Remote devices such as smartphones implement the Xfinity TV Remote App (Compl. ¶179). ¶179 col. 9:43-49
wherein the local... guide and the remote... guide are operative to communicate via an Internet communications path; The app and the in-home X1 system communicate over the Internet (Compl. ¶179). ¶179 col. 10:29-40
wherein the remote... guide is further operative to... display program listings based on a user profile that is stored remotely from the remote... access device; The remote app displays listings based on user-specific data stored on Comcast's servers, which are remote from the user's mobile device (Compl. ¶¶ 179, 152). ¶179 col. 17:4-9
wherein the remote... guide is further operative to... receive a user selection... and, in response..., communicate the user selection to the local... guide to schedule the recording... The app receives a user's selection to record a program and communicates it to the in-home DVR to schedule the recording (Compl. ¶¶ 179, 185). ¶185 col. 12:25-29
  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Scope Questions: For both the ’263 and ’413 Patents, a central dispute may arise over the claimed location of the "user profile." The claims require the profile to be "stored remotely from the remote... access device." The complaint alleges this is met by storing the profile on Comcast's servers, which are remote from the user's mobile phone. A question for the court may be whether this server-based storage architecture falls within the scope of an invention whose specification frequently describes interaction with a user's local, in-home equipment and preferences (’263 Patent, col. 17:4-9).
    • Technical Questions: The infringement allegations rely on the Xfinity TV Remote App communicating with the in-home X1 system to schedule recordings. A technical question for the court will be to determine the precise data flow and communication protocol between the app, Comcast's servers, and the user's set-top box to ascertain if it aligns with the communication steps required by the asserted claims.

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

  • The Term: "user profile that is stored remotely from the remote interactive television program guide access device" (from claim 14 of the ’263 Patent and claim 1 of the ’413 Patent).
  • Context and Importance: The location of the "user profile" is a specific limitation in the asserted claims of the lead patents. The viability of the infringement case may depend on whether a profile stored on Comcast's central servers—as opposed to the user's local, in-home equipment—satisfies this limitation when the "remote access device" is a mobile phone. Practitioners may focus on this term because it delineates the required system architecture.
  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The specification discloses client-server architectures where a "program guide server" at a "television distribution facility" can be part of the system (’263 Patent, col. 5:64-6:2; Fig. 2d). This may support an interpretation where "remotely" simply means not stored on the mobile device itself, allowing for storage on a third-party server like Comcast's.
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The patent repeatedly describes the invention as providing remote access to the user's "in-home program guide" and its features (’263 Patent, col. 2:23-28). The specification also describes using "information on the user's preferences" that is obtained "from the local interactive television program guide" (’263 Patent, col. 17:4-9). This language may support an interpretation requiring the user profile to be stored at the "local... equipment" (i.e., the set-top box) to be "remote" from the mobile device in the manner contemplated by the invention.

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The complaint alleges inducement of infringement against all Defendants, asserting that Comcast provides instructions, user guides, and marketing materials that encourage customers to use the accused products in an infringing manner (e.g., using the remote DVR app) (Compl. ¶¶ 157-160). It is also alleged that Comcast induces the Manufacturer Defendants by providing specifications and technical support for building the accused set-top boxes (Compl. ¶159). Contributory infringement is alleged on the basis that the accused products are specially designed to infringe and have no substantial non-infringing uses (Compl. ¶164).
  • Willful Infringement: The complaint alleges that Defendants knew or should have known of the asserted patents due to prior licensing agreements that covered the patents-in-suit (Compl. ¶¶ 156, 181). Willfulness is further supported by allegations that Rovi provided Comcast with specific presentations and claim charts demonstrating infringement during license renewal negotiations that occurred prior to the lawsuit (Compl. ¶¶ 4, 156). Continued infringement after the filing of the suit is also alleged as a basis for willfulness (Compl. ¶166).

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

  • A core issue will be one of architectural scope: does the claim language in the remote access patents (e.g., ’263 and ’413 Patents), which requires a "user profile that is stored remotely from the remote... access device," read on a modern, cloud-based system where the user profile resides on a third-party (Comcast) server, or is the claim scope limited to architectures where the profile is stored at the user's local, in-home equipment?
  • A key evidentiary question will be one of functional operation across multiple patents: The complaint alleges infringement of patents covering distinct features such as remote recording, parallel buffering ('147 Patent), multi-tuner conflict resolution ('512 Patent), and whole-home DVRs ('871 Patent). The case will likely require a detailed technical examination of how the integrated Comcast X1 platform actually performs each of these functions to determine if its methods of operation map onto the specific steps and system components required by the asserted claims.
  • A central question for damages and potential enhancement will be one of knowledge and intent: given the detailed allegations of a long-standing, multi-patent licensing relationship that recently expired, coupled with pre-suit notice via claim charts, the court will likely focus on what Comcast knew about the patents-in-suit and when, which will be critical to the determination of willful infringement.