DCT

1:06-cv-00268

Helmsderfer v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment Inc

Log In
Key Events
Amended Complaint

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 1:06-cv-00268, S.D. Ohio, 06/21/2006
  • Venue Allegations: Venue is based on the sale and/or distribution of infringing products within the judicial district by all defendants, and on the Ohio corporate status and principal places of business for defendants Target, BWA, and Patterson.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiffs allege that Defendants’ stainless steel baby changing stations infringe a patent related to the design and features of such stations, including utility channels for holding supplies.
  • Technical Context: The technology concerns wall-mounted baby diaper changing stations, a common fixture in public restrooms, focusing on designs that enhance safety, utility, and durability while complying with accessibility regulations.
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint alleges inventor John A. Helmsderfer is the owner of the patent-in-suit and that Brocar Products Inc. is an exclusive licensee. No other prior litigation, IPR proceedings, or licensing history is mentioned.

Case Timeline

Date Event
1995-06-07 U.S. Patent No. 6,049,928 Priority Date
2000-04-18 U.S. Patent No. 6,049,928 Issue Date
2006-06-21 Complaint Filed

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 6,049,928, "Baby Diaper Changing Station," issued April 18, 2000.

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent describes several drawbacks with then-existing wall-mounted baby changing stations. These include having a shallow platform depth that is inadequate for containing active toddlers, which is a constraint driven by ADA regulations limiting protrusion from the wall to four inches when closed (U.S. Pat. No. 6,049,928, col. 1:35-48). Other problems cited are the lack of convenient space to place supplies like diapers and lotions, forcing parents to use unsanitary floors, and the vulnerability of the stations' large, exposed surfaces to permanent vandalism and graffiti (U.S. Pat. No. 6,049,928, col. 2:14-34, col. 2:61-65).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention proposes several improvements to solve these problems. These include various "rail structures" or telescoping sections to increase the effective depth of the changing surface when open (U.S. Pat. No. 6,049,928, col. 3:39-51, col. 5:56-6:17). To address supply storage, the patent describes a "utility channel" surrounding the platform to hold supplies (U.S. Pat. No. 6,049,928, col. 4:66-col. 5:3). To combat vandalism, the patent teaches the use of removable protective panels on exposed surfaces, which can be replaced easily if defaced (U.S. Pat. No. 6,049,928, col. 4:55-65).
  • Technical Importance: The described solutions aim to create a safer, more convenient, and more durable changing station that remains compliant with public accommodation laws like the ADA.

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint alleges infringement of the '928 patent generally, without specifying any particular claims (Compl. ¶13). Independent claim 17 is representative of the utility-focused aspects of the invention.
  • Independent Claim 17:
    • A wall-mounted station for changing the diapers of a baby comprising:
    • an elongated and generally planar support platform having top and bottom surfaces, and opposing sides, the support platform hingedly fixable at one side with respect to a wall;
    • the support platform being movable between an opened position and a closed position;
    • a utility channel formed in said platform proximate a side of the platform, the utility channel being formed in the platform around the top surface generally coextensive with at least two adjacent sides of the platform to be accessed from various positions around the baby changing station;
    • and being configured for holding supplies for changing the diapers of a baby to be in readily accessible from the top surface for producing an easy, convenient changing environment.
  • The complaint does not reserve the right to assert dependent claims.

III. The Accused Instrumentality

Product Identification

  • The complaint identifies "stainless steel baby changing stations, including at least models KB110-SSRE and KB110-SSWM," manufactured by Defendant Bobrick and sold or offered for sale by the other Defendants (Compl. ¶13).

Functionality and Market Context

  • The complaint describes the accused instrumentalities as "stainless steel baby changing stations" (Compl. ¶13). It alleges that Defendant Bobrick manufactures, sells, offers for sale, uses, and/or imports these products, and that the other defendants sell and/or offer them for sale (Compl. ¶13). The complaint does not provide further technical detail about the design or operation of the accused products. No probative visual evidence provided in complaint.

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

The complaint alleges infringement of the '928 patent but does not contain a claim chart or detailed, element-by-element infringement allegations. The following chart summarizes the infringement theory for representative independent claim 17, based on the general allegations in the complaint.

'928 Patent Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 17) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
A wall-mounted station for changing the diapers of a baby comprising: an elongated and generally planar support platform...hingedly fixable at one side with respect to a wall... The complaint alleges that the accused products are "stainless steel baby changing stations" which implies they are wall-mounted platforms for supporting a baby. ¶13 col. 17:46-55
a utility channel formed in said platform proximate a side of the platform...generally coextensive with at least two adjacent sides of the platform... The complaint's general infringement allegation implies that the accused products contain a structure that meets the definition of the claimed "utility channel." ¶13 col. 18:56-62
and being configured for holding supplies for changing the diapers of a baby to be in readily accessible from the top surface for producing an easy, convenient changing environment. The complaint's allegation implies that the accused products' purported "utility channel" is configured for holding supplies in a manner accessible to the user. ¶13 col. 18:62-68

Identified Points of Contention

  • Scope Questions: A central question will be whether any recessed area or tray on the accused products constitutes a "utility channel" as that term is used in the '928 Patent. The analysis may depend on whether the term requires a channel that is "coextensive with at least two adjacent sides of the platform," as specified in claim 17.
  • Technical Questions: The complaint does not provide any evidence showing the specific design or features of the accused Bobrick models. A key evidentiary question will be whether the accused products, as actually designed and sold, possess a structure that meets every limitation of the asserted claim, particularly the "utility channel" limitation.

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

The complaint does not provide sufficient detail for a definitive analysis of claim construction disputes. However, based on the technology and the asserted claim, certain terms may become central to the case.

  • The Term: "utility channel"
  • Context and Importance: This term appears in independent claim 17 and is a core feature of one of the patent's described improvements. The outcome of the infringement analysis for this claim will likely depend on how broadly or narrowly this term is construed. Practitioners may focus on this term because its definition could distinguish the claimed invention from prior art or from the accused products.
  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The specification describes the channel's function as receiving "various changing supplies such as powder, lotion and extra diapers" (U.S. Pat. No. 6,049,928, col. 4:1-3) and providing a "convenient receptacle for baby changing supplies" (U.S. Pat. No. 6,049,928, col. 9:2-4). This functional language could support a construction that covers any recessed area capable of holding such supplies.
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: Claim 17 itself limits the term, requiring the channel to be "formed in the platform around the top surface generally coextensive with at least two adjacent sides of the platform" (U.S. Pat. No. 6,049,928, col. 18:58-61). Figure 1 shows a channel (24) that fully surrounds the changing surface (18). This could support a narrower construction requiring a more extensive, wrap-around channel rather than a simple, single-sided tray.

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The complaint does not contain allegations of indirect infringement (inducement or contributory infringement).
  • Willful Infringement: The complaint alleges that the defendants' infringing acts "have been and continue to be willful" (Compl. ¶15). The allegation is made "upon information and belief" and does not specify a factual basis for knowledge of the patent, such as pre-suit notice or knowledge of a competitor's patent portfolio (Compl. ¶15).

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

Given the general nature of the complaint, the case will likely turn on fundamental questions of claim scope and evidence of infringement that will be developed during discovery.

  • A primary issue will be one of claim construction: What are the structural and functional requirements of a "utility channel" as claimed in the '928 patent? Does the term require a specific geometry, such as being "coextensive with at least two adjacent sides," or can it be read more broadly to cover any integrated supply tray?
  • A second issue will be evidentiary: Assuming a claim construction is adopted, what evidence will show that the accused Bobrick KB110-SSRE and KB110-SSWM models actually incorporate a structure that meets all limitations of an asserted claim? The complaint itself provides no such evidence.