DCT
2:10-cv-00232
Condatis LLC v. ARINC Inc
General
Filed
07/09/10
Cause of ActionPatent Infringement
SectorCommunications
StatusClosed
Patent Owner
Operating Company
PACER
2:10-cv-00232
CourtE.D. Texas
Judge | Period | PO Win Rate |
|---|---|---|
10/05/11 - 10/06/11 | 41% | |
07/12/10 - 10/05/11 | 53% |
Plaintiff
Attorney
Name | Ratings |
|---|---|
L1 D | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
L4 B | |
L2 D |
No Attorneys
Defendant
Party
Name | Ratings |
|---|---|
L2 E | |
L4 E | |
L4 E | |
L4 E | |
L4 E | |
L3 C | |
L3 E | |
L3 E | |
L3 E | |
L3 E | |
L3 E | |
L2 A | |
L2 B | |
L2 B | |
L2 D | |
L2 D | |
L2 D | |
L2 D | |
L2 D | |
L2 E | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- |
No Parties
Attorney
Name | Ratings |
|---|---|
L5 A | |
L3 A | |
Heartfield Law FirmLocal | L5 A |
L5 A | |
L5 A | |
Potter MintonLocal | L5 A |
L5 B | |
L5 A | |
L3 A | |
L5 A | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
L5 A | |
-- -- -- | |
L5 D | |
L4 D | |
L3 E | |
Gillam & Smith LLPLocal | L5 E |
L5 E | |
-- -- -- | |
L5 E | |
L5 E | |
Jackson Walker LLPLocal | L4 A |
L5 A | |
L4 A | |
L4 A | |
-- -- -- | |
Ramey & FlockLocal | L4 A |
L3 C | |
L4 B | |
L5 A | |
L4 B | |
L2 C | |
L4 B | |
L5 A | |
L4 B | |
L4 E | |
-- -- -- | |
L4 E | |
L5 E | |
L2 E | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
L1 C | |
L3 A | |
Yetter Coleman LLPLocal | -- -- -- |
-- -- -- | |
Beik Law Firm PLLCLocal | -- -- -- |
-- -- -- | |
Craft Chu PLLCLocal | -- -- -- |
-- -- -- |
No Attorneys