DCT
2:12-cv-00443
Geotag Inc v. Burberry Ltd
General
Filed
08/14/12
Cause of ActionPatent Infringement
SectorComp. Arch. and Software
StatusClosed
Patent Owner
Operating Company
PACER
2:12-cv-00443
CourtE.D. Texas
| Judge | Period | PO Win Rate | 
|---|---|---|
| 01/15/13 - 11/26/13 | 36% | |
| 01/15/13 - 01/15/13 | 36% | |
| 01/15/13 - 01/15/13 | 31% | |
| 08/15/12 - 01/15/13 | 31% | 
Plaintiff
Attorney
| Name | Ratings | 
|---|---|
| Tadlock Law FirmLocal | L2 D | 
| L2 A | |
| L1 D | |
| L2 E | |
| L5 E | |
| L5 E | |
| L5 E | |
| L2 C | |
| L2 E | |
| L2 E | |
| -- -- -- | |
| L1 C | |
| L4 B | |
| L2 D | |
| L1 C | |
| L2 D | |
| L1 D | |
| L1 D | |
| Spangler & FussellLocal | L1 D | 
| L5 E | |
| L1 E | |
| L3 D | |
| L2 C | |
| -- -- -- | |
| L1 D | 
No Attorneys
Defendant
Attorney
| Name | Ratings | 
|---|---|
| L5 B | |
| L5 A | |
| L5 B | |
| -- -- -- | |
| L3 B | |
| L4 C | |
| L4 E | |
| L2 B | |
| L1 B | |
| -- -- -- | |
| -- -- -- | |
| -- -- -- | |
| L1 D | |
| -- -- -- | |
| -- -- -- | |
| -- -- -- | 
No Attorneys