DCT
2:12-cv-00521
Geotag Inc v. Hallmark Cards Inc
General
Filed
08/28/12
Cause of ActionPatent Infringement
SectorComp. Arch. and Software
StatusClosed
Patent Owner
Operating Company
PACER
2:12-cv-00521
CourtE.D. Texas
| Judge | Period | PO Win Rate | 
|---|---|---|
| 02/05/13 - 01/03/14 | 36% | |
| 01/15/13 - 02/05/13 | 31% | |
| 01/15/13 - 01/15/13 | 36% | |
| 08/28/12 - 01/15/13 | 31% | 
Plaintiff
Attorney
| Name | Ratings | 
|---|---|
| Tadlock Law FirmLocal | L2 D | 
| L4 A | |
| L1 D | |
| L2 E | |
| L5 E | |
| L5 E | |
| L4 E | |
| L2 C | |
| L2 E | |
| L2 E | |
| Spangler & FussellLocal | L2 E | 
| L5 E | |
| L1 D | |
| L1 D | |
| L1 D | |
| L4 B | |
| L2 D | |
| L2 D | |
| L1 E | |
| L3 D | |
| L2 C | 
No Attorneys
Defendant
Attorney
| Name | Ratings | 
|---|---|
| Heartfield Law FirmLocal | L4 A | 
| L5 A | |
| L4 E | |
| L5 E | |
| L3 B | |
| L5 A | |
| L2 B | |
| L2 D | |
| L2 D | |
| L3 B | |
| L3 E | |
| L2 B | |
| L2 D | |
| L1 D | |
| L3 B | 
No Attorneys