DCT
2:16-cv-00134
Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. Broadcom Ltd
General
Filed
02/14/16
Cause of ActionPatent Infringement
SectorSemicond., Optic
Status
Closed (05/02/17)
Patent Owner
NPE (W)
PACER
2:16-cv-00134
CourtE.D. Texas
| Judge | Period | PO Win Rate | 
|---|---|---|
| 02/17/16 - 07/28/17 | 33% | 
Magistrate
Roy S. Payne
Plaintiff
Attorney
| Name | Ratings | 
|---|---|
| Gillam & Smith LLPLocal | L5 A | 
| L5 A | |
| L5 A | |
| L4 B | |
| L4 A | |
| L2 A | |
| L2 C | |
| L2 D | |
| L1 B | |
| L1 D | |
| -- -- -- | |
| -- -- -- | |
| -- -- -- | |
| -- -- -- | |
| -- -- -- | 
No Attorneys
Defendant
Party
| Name | Ratings | 
|---|---|
| L4 A | |
| L4 A | |
| L4 A | |
| L4 A | |
| L4 A | 
No Parties
Attorney
| Name | Ratings | 
|---|---|
| Potter MintonLocal | L5 A | 
| L5 A | |
| L5 A | |
| L5 E | |
| L4 A | |
| L5 A | |
| L5 A | |
| L4 A | |
| L4 A | |
| L3 A | |
| L3 A | |
| L1 B | |
| L1 B | |
| -- -- -- | |
| L4 A | |
| L2 D | |
| L4 C | |
| L4 A | |
| L3 C | |
| L2 B | |
| L2 D | |
| L2 D | |
| Dacus FirmLocal | L3 C | 
| L5 A | |
| L3 C | |
| L5 A | |
| L4 A | |
| L4 E | |
| L1 D | 
No Attorneys