DCT

2:17-cv-00119

American GNC Corp v. LG Electronics Inc

Log In

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 2:17-cv-00119, E.D. Tex., 02/09/2017
  • Venue Allegations: Venue is alleged based on Defendants' substantial business in the Eastern District of Texas, including placing infringing products into the stream of commerce with the expectation they will be purchased and used by consumers in the district.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s mobile devices, including smartphones, tablets, and smartwatches, infringe seven patents related to micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) gyroscopes, inertial measurement units (IMUs), and associated navigation processes.
  • Technical Context: The technology at issue involves MEMS sensors for detecting motion and orientation, a foundational technology for navigation, gaming, and user interface functions in modern consumer electronics.
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint details nearly two years of pre-suit licensing negotiations, beginning in March 2015, during which Plaintiff allegedly provided Defendant with notice of the patents-in-suit and claim charts detailing its infringement contentions. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant continued its accused activities despite this knowledge.

Case Timeline

Date Event
1999-04-21 U.S. Patent 6,415,227 Priority Date
1999-09-16 U.S. Patent 6,508,122 Priority Date
1999-11-17 U.S. Patent 6,311,555 Priority Date
2000-01-04 U.S. Patents 6,516,283 & 6,671,648 Priority Date
2000-09-26 U.S. Patent 6,792,353 Priority Date
2001-05-24 U.S. Patent 6,697,758 Priority Date
2001-11-06 U.S. Patent 6,311,555 Issued
2002-07-02 U.S. Patent 6,415,227 Issued
2003-01-21 U.S. Patent 6,508,122 Issued
2003-02-04 U.S. Patent 6,516,283 Issued
2003-12-30 U.S. Patent 6,671,648 Issued
2004-02-24 U.S. Patent 6,697,758 Issued
2004-09-14 U.S. Patent 6,792,353 Issued
2015-03-16 LG allegedly notified of ’648, ’758, and ’283 patents
2015-09-24 LG allegedly notified of ’227 patent
2016-03-03 LG allegedly notified of ’555 and ’122 patents
2016-04-05 LG allegedly notified of ’353 patent
2017-02-09 Complaint Filed

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 6,508,122 - “Microelectromechanical System for Measuring Angular Rate”

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent addresses the challenge of creating inexpensive, reliable, and high-performance MEMS-based angular rate sensors (gyroscopes) that can compete with the accuracy of larger, more expensive conventional gyros (U.S. Patent 6311555, col. 2:15-22).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention describes a system with three main components: a MEMS sensor unit that vibrates, a central circuitry that processes signals from this vibration, and a digital signal processing (DSP) system. The core of the solution is a closed-loop system where the DSP analyzes the sensor's motion and feeds back precisely controlled "dither driver signals" to maintain a highly stable oscillation, thereby improving measurement accuracy (’122 Patent, Abstract; U.S. Patent 6,311,555, Fig. 3).
  • Technical Importance: This system architecture provided a method for achieving high-accuracy motion sensing within the small footprint and low cost of MEMS technology, a key enabler for its widespread adoption in consumer devices (Compl. ¶22, ¶24).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • Independent claim 1 is asserted (Compl. ¶77).
  • Essential elements of claim 1 include:
    • An angular rate sensor unit that receives input signals (dither driver, excitation, displacement restoring) and outputs angle rate signals.
    • A central circuitry that receives the angle rate signals and outputs processed angular rate signals and digital displacement signals.
    • A digital signal processing system that analyzes the displacement signals and feeds back the dither driver signals to the sensor unit.
  • The complaint does not explicitly assert dependent claims but lists multiple claims for other patents, suggesting a reservation of rights (Compl. ¶38).

U.S. Patent No. 6,311,555 - “Angular Rate Producer with Microelectromechanical System Technology”

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent seeks to overcome the performance limitations of existing MEMS angular rate sensors, aiming to match the accuracy and stability of conventional iron-wheel and optical gyroscopes in a miniaturized format (’555 Patent, col. 2:5-22).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention is a process for producing an angular rate measurement. The process involves using a "dither drive signal" to maintain a constant-momentum oscillation in a MEMS device. Motion-induced signals from the device are then converted by an "interfacing circuitry." A "digital processing system" analyzes these converted signals and, in a feedback loop, generates the dither drive signal needed to lock the frequency and amplitude of the oscillation, ensuring a high-quality, stable measurement (’555 Patent, Abstract; col. 8:36-47).
  • Technical Importance: This claimed process established a method for controlling the core mechanics of a MEMS gyroscope with digital precision, enabling the production of low-cost sensors with the high performance required for advanced applications like indoor navigation (Compl. ¶24).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • Independent claim 49 is asserted (Compl. ¶126).
  • Essential elements of claim 49 include the steps of:
    • (a) Receiving a dither drive signal to maintain oscillation of inertial elements and producing angular motion-induced signals.
    • (b) Converting the motion-induced signals into repeatable angular rate signals and digital displacement signals in an interfacing circuitry.
    • (c) Inputting the digital displacement signals into a digital processing system and producing the dither drive signal to lock the frequency and amplitude of the oscillating elements.
  • The complaint does not explicitly assert dependent claims for the ’555 Patent.

U.S. Patent No. 6,671,648 - “Micro Inertial Measurement Unit”

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent describes a micro inertial measurement unit (IMU) that combines a three-axis angular rate producer (gyroscope) and a three-axis acceleration producer (accelerometer). A third producer component receives the electrical signals from both and converts them into digital angular increments and digital velocity increments, respectively (’648 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claims 1 and dependent claim 4 are asserted (Compl. ¶38).
  • Accused Features: The complaint accuses LG's "Accused IMU Products," which include devices containing an IMU such as the InvenSense MPU-6500, of infringing the ’648 Patent (Compl. ¶174, ¶178).

U.S. Patent No. 6,697,758 - “Processing Method for Motion Measurement”

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent claims a method for motion measurement. The process involves producing three-axis angular rate and acceleration signals, converting them into digital angular and velocity increments, and then using those increments in a processor to compute attitude and heading angles (’758 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 1 is asserted (Compl. ¶38).
  • Accused Features: The infringement allegations target the processing methods used in the "Accused IMU Products," which allegedly perform the claimed steps of signal production, conversion, and computation (Compl. ¶225-226).

U.S. Patent No. 6,516,283 - “Core Inertial Measurement Unit”

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent describes a "core" IMU that builds upon the gyroscope and accelerometer combination by adding an Earth's magnetic field detector (compass). A processor then uses the digital increments from all three sensor types (gyro, accelerometer, compass) to compute motion measurements, including position, attitude, and heading (’283 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 1 and dependent claim 3 are asserted (Compl. ¶38).
  • Accused Features: The complaint accuses "Accused IMU/Compass Products," which are devices that include an IMU and a compass, such as the LG G3 containing an InvenSense IMU and an Alps geomagnetic sensor (Compl. ¶278, ¶313).

U.S. Patent No. 6,792,353 - “Enhanced Inertial Measurement Unit/Global Positioning System Mapping and Navigation Process”

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent claims a navigation process that integrates data from an IMU and a GPS receiver. The process involves retrieving geospatial map data based on the measured position using a "tile index file," performing "time-space filtering" on the combined sensor and map data to derive a "true position," and displaying the user's trajectory (’353 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claims 1 and 6, and dependent claims 2, 3, and 7 are asserted (Compl. ¶38).
  • Accused Features: The allegations target "Accused IMU/GPS Products" that contain an IMU, GPS, and mapping software (like Google Maps), which allegedly perform the claimed blending, filtering, and display steps (Compl. ¶343, ¶367, ¶374).

U.S. Patent No. 6,415,227 - “Enhanced Global Positioning System and Map Navigation Process”

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent describes a navigation process similar to the ’353 Patent but based on integrating data from a GPS receiver alone with a geospatial map database. The process also uses a "tile index file" for efficient data retrieval and "time-space filtering" based on current and previous positions/velocities to derive and display a user's trajectory (’227 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claims 1 and 36, and dependent claims 2 and 3 are asserted (Compl. ¶38).
  • Accused Features: The accused instrumentalities are "Accused GPS System Products," identified as LG devices that include a GPS receiver, a map database (e.g., Google Maps), and a display that perform the accused navigation process (Compl. ¶510, ¶512).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

Product Identification

  • The complaint groups the accused products into several categories based on the asserted patents. The "Accused Gyroscope Products" and "Accused IMU Products" include a wide range of LG smartphones (e.g., LG G2, G3, G4, G5, Nexus 5X), tablets (e.g., G Pad series), and smartwatches (e.g., Watch Urbane) (Compl. ¶78, ¶174). The "Accused IMU/GPS Products" and "Accused GPS System Products" refer to many of the same devices, focusing on their integrated navigation capabilities (Compl. ¶343, ¶510).

Functionality and Market Context

  • The core accused functionality resides in the devices' motion-sensing and navigation hardware and software. The complaint specifically identifies components such as the InvenSense MPU-6500 IMU, which contains a three-axis MEMS gyroscope and accelerometer, as infringing the system and method claims (Compl. ¶81, ¶130). For the navigation patents, the functionality extends to the devices' GPS transceivers, processors (e.g., Qualcomm Snapdragon 801), and pre-loaded software like Google Maps, which allegedly work together to process sensor data, retrieve map data, and display a user's location and trajectory (Compl. ¶348, ¶356, ¶364). The complaint notes that LG is ranked as the third-largest supplier of mobile devices in the U.S., suggesting significant commercial activity related to the accused products (Compl. ¶7).

No probative visual evidence provided in complaint.

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

U.S. Patent 6,508,122 Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 1) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
an angular rate sensor unit receiving dither driver signals, capacitive pickoff excitation signals and a displacement restoring signal and outputting angle rate signals in response to motion... The InvenSense gyroscope's components (drive element, proof mass, Coriolis sensor) allegedly receive driving and control signals to sense motion and output corresponding angle rate signals (Compl. ¶86-92, ¶101). ¶86-101 U.S. 6,311,555, col. 5:31-40
a central circuitry receiving said angle rate signals...and outputting angular rate signals and digital low frequency inertial element displacement signals The InvenSense architecture allegedly amplifies, demodulates, and filters the sensor signals to produce a proportional voltage (angular rate signal) and uses a drive sense amplifier to process dither motion into displacement signals (Compl. ¶102-104, ¶109, ¶111). ¶102-111 U.S. 6,311,555, col. 6:21-36
a digital signal processing system analyzing said digital low frequency inertial element displacement signals and feeding back said dither driver signals to said angular rate sensor unit. The InvenSense gyroscope’s drive loop, allegedly including a phase detector (PLL) and Automatic Gain Control (AGC), analyzes displacement to control and generate the dither driver signal that vibrates the proof mass (Compl. ¶116-121). ¶116-121 U.S. 6,311,555, col. 6:50-65

U.S. Patent 6,311,555 Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 49) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
(a) receiving dither drive signal to maintain an oscillation of at least one set of inertial elements in an angular rate detecting unit with constant momentum, and producing angular motion-induced signals... The accused gyroscopes allegedly use a drive-loop with dither drive signals to oscillate a proof mass at a resonant frequency, while the sensing structure (Coriolis sensor) picks up capacitance changes from rotation to produce a voltage signal (Compl. ¶137-143). ¶137-143 col. 8:13-20
(b) converting said angular motion-induced signals from said angular rate detecting unit in an interfacing circuitry into consistent and repeatable angular rate signals...and converting said inertial element dither motion signals...into digital element displacement signals... The accused gyroscope’s interfacing circuitry allegedly amplifies, demodulates, and filters the motion-induced voltage signal into repeatable X, Y, and Z-axis angular rate signals and converts dither motion signals into digital displacement signals (Compl. ¶147-150). ¶147-150 col. 8:21-35
(c) inputting said digital element displacement signals into a digital processing system and producing said dither drive signal for locking high-quality factor frequency and amplitude... The accused gyroscope’s digital processing system allegedly uses a phase-locked loop (PLL) and automatic gain control (AGC) to analyze the displacement signals, thereby locking the frequency and amplitude and producing the dither drive signal (Compl. ¶154-161). ¶154-161 col. 8:36-47

Identified Points of Contention

  • Scope Questions: Claim 49 of the ’555 Patent recites a process for measuring a "vehicle angular rate." A central question of claim scope will be whether this term can be construed to cover a handheld consumer electronic device like a smartphone or smartwatch. The complaint appears to anticipate this by alleging infringement occurs when the accused products are used "in/on a vehicle" (Compl. ¶162), which raises the question of whether LG can be held liable for its users' actions in this context.
  • Technical Questions: The complaint makes highly specific allegations regarding the internal operation of third-party components like the InvenSense MPU-6500. For example, it alleges a "drive sense amplifier...inherently acts as a low pass filter" to satisfy a claim element (Compl. ¶111). A primary point of technical contention will be whether the accused components' actual architecture and operation map onto the distinct functional elements required by the claims (e.g., the "central circuitry" and "digital signal processing system" of '122 Claim 1), or if there is a functional or structural mismatch.

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

  • The Term: "vehicle" (from ’555 Patent, claim 49)

  • Context and Importance: The applicability of this method claim to the accused products may depend on the construction of "vehicle." If the term is construed narrowly to mean only traditional modes of transport (e.g., cars, planes), infringement allegations may be limited to situations where the accused smartphones are used within such a transport. Practitioners may focus on this term because it could significantly narrow the scope of infringing acts for which the defendant is directly liable.

  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:

    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The patent specification does not explicitly limit the term to a specific type of vehicle. The claims refer to measuring "vehicle angular rate" generally, which could be argued to encompass any object or "carrier" whose motion is being measured.
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The patent's background mentions applications in "automotive to consumer electronics" ('555 Patent, col. 2:4-6), but the common understanding of "vehicle" implies a means of conveyance, not the electronic device itself.

  • The Term: "central circuitry" (from ’122 Patent, claim 1)

  • Context and Importance: Claim 1 of the ’122 Patent recites a "central circuitry" and a "digital signal processing system" as separate limitations. The defendant may argue that the accused products integrate these functions into a single processor and therefore lack a distinct "central circuitry." The construction of this term will be critical to determining whether the accused architecture, which combines many functions on a single chip, meets the claim's structural requirements.

  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:

    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: A patentee could argue that the terms refer to distinct functional roles rather than requiring separate physical components. As long as a set of circuits performs the signal conversion function of the "central circuitry" and another performs the feedback-and-analysis function of the "digital signal processing system," the claim is met.
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The block diagram in the parent ’555 Patent (Fig. 3) depicts "Interfacing Circuitry" and "Digital Processing System" as structurally separate blocks. A defendant could argue this figure informs the claim language and implies that two physically or architecturally distinct components are required.

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The complaint alleges inducement of infringement for its method claims. It states that LG provides user guides and advertising materials that encourage users to operate features, such as Google Maps, in a manner that practices the patented navigation processes (Compl. ¶40, ¶165, ¶387).
  • Willful Infringement: Willfulness is a central allegation, supported by detailed accounts of pre-suit communications. The complaint alleges that LG had actual knowledge of the patents-in-suit and the alleged infringement for nearly two years prior to the complaint's filing, citing a series of letters, claim charts, phone calls, and in-person meetings that began on March 16, 2015 (Compl. ¶42, ¶69, ¶608).

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

  • A core issue will be one of definitional scope: can the term "vehicle," as used in the ’555 Patent, be construed to cover handheld consumer electronics directly, or is infringement limited to the use of those devices within a traditional mode of transport, as the complaint appears to plead in the alternative?
  • A key evidentiary question will be one of technical mapping: do the integrated, multi-function chipsets in the accused LG products contain architecturally distinct components that perform the separate functions of the claimed "central circuitry" and "digital signal processing system," or is there a fundamental mismatch between the patent's claimed structure and the accused product's integrated design?
  • Given the extensive, documented history of pre-suit notifications alleged in the complaint, a central question for damages will be one of willfulness: did LG's alleged conduct after receiving notice and detailed infringement contentions rise to the level of willful infringement, potentially justifying an award of enhanced damages?