DCT
2:22-cv-00126
Arigna Technology Ltd v. Nissan Motor Co Ltd
General
Filed
04/27/22
Cause of ActionPatent Infringement
SectorSemicond., Optic
StatusClosed
Patent Owner
Operating Company
PACER
2:22-cv-00126
Nature of Suit830 Patent
CourtE.D. Texas
Judge | Period | PO Win Rate |
|---|---|---|
04/27/22 - 01/18/23 | 36% |
Magistrate
Roy S. Payne
Plaintiff
Attorney
Name | Ratings |
|---|---|
L5 E | |
L5 E | |
L5 E | |
L4 A | |
L2 C | |
-- -- -- | |
L4 E | |
L3 E | |
L3 E | |
L3 E | |
L2 B | |
L2 D | |
L2 E | |
L2 E | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- | |
-- -- -- |
No Attorneys
Defendant
Party
No Parties
Attorney
Name | Ratings |
|---|---|
L5 A | |
L5 D | |
L3 B | |
L2 C | |
Gillam & Smith LLPLocal | L5 A |
L5 A | |
L5 A | |
L5 A | |
L3 A | |
L3 C | |
L2 D | |
L5 B | |
L4 A | |
L4 D | |
L5 B | |
-- -- -- | |
Heartfield Law FirmLocal | L4 A |
L5 A | |
L4 A | |
L4 B | |
L4 C | |
L2 B | |
L1 D | |
-- -- -- | |
L3 A | |
L4 A | |
L4 A | |
L3 B | |
L3 A | |
L2 A | |
L2 B | |
L2 B | |
L3 B | |
L5 B | |
L2 B | |
L2 C | |
L2 D | |
-- -- -- |
No Attorneys