DCT

2:23-cv-00174

Hanshow Technology Co Ltd v. SES imagotag SA

Log In

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 2:23-cv-00174, E.D. Tex., 11/22/2023
  • Venue Allegations: Plaintiff alleges venue is proper because Defendants are not U.S. residents and have substantial business contacts within the district, including marketing, sales, and partnerships with nationwide retailers operating extensively in Texas.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s VUSION electronic shelf label (ESL) systems infringe three U.S. patents related to interactive tag communication and the management of services via bearer tags.
  • Technical Context: The technology concerns smart retail systems, specifically electronic shelf labels that can communicate wirelessly with central servers for dynamic pricing and with consumer devices for interactive shopping experiences.
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint is a First Amended Complaint, but it does not mention any prior litigation, inter partes review proceedings, or specific licensing history relevant to the asserted patents.

Case Timeline

Date Event
2009-02-27 Earliest Priority Date for ’210 and ’994 Patents
2013-01-01 U.S. Patent 8,346,210 Issues
2017-05-02 U.S. Patent 9,641,994 Issues
2018-07-02 Earliest Priority Date for ’216 Patent
2022-12-27 U.S. Patent 11,540,216 Issues
2023-11-22 First Amended Complaint Filed

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 11,540,216 - "Interactive Electronic Tag Device Communication System and Method"

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: Conventional electronic price tags face a trade-off between responsiveness and battery life. A short monitoring period for receiving updates provides fast response but consumes significant power, while a long monitoring period conserves power but results in slow updates, harming the user experience. (’216 Patent, col. 1:22-63).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention proposes a dual-mode communication system. An electronic tag operates in a power-saving "normal monitoring mode" by default. When a user interacts with the tag via a short-range "second communication path" (e.g., NFC with a smartphone), the tag enters a "fast monitoring mode" and immediately sends the user's data to a base station over a long-range "first communication path" (e.g., 2.4 GHz RF). This triggers the base station to also enter a "fast wake-up mode," enabling rapid, on-demand communication between the server, base station, and tag without shortening the monitoring period for the entire network of tags. (’216 Patent, Abstract; col. 2:6-50).
  • Technical Importance: This approach aims to provide the instant interactivity demanded by modern retail applications without the significant battery life penalty that would result from keeping thousands of in-store tags in a constant state of high alert. (’216 Patent, col. 1:55-63).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts independent claims 1, 7, and 14. (Compl. ¶34).
  • Independent Claim 1 (System Claim) requires:
    • A background server, a base station, an electronic tag device, and an external device.
    • The electronic tag having a first and second communication path.
    • The first path supporting a "normal monitoring mode" and a "fast monitoring mode."
    • The base station supporting a "normal wake-up mode" and a "fast wake-up mode."
    • A sequence of operations where the external device sends data to the tag, which then enters its fast mode, transmits to the base station, which in turn communicates with the server and then sends instructions back to the tag in its fast mode.
  • The complaint reserves the right to assert dependent claims 2, 8, and 15. (Compl. ¶34).

U.S. Patent No. 8,346,210 - "Method and apparatus for managing services using bearer tags"

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The process of discovering, purchasing, activating, and managing optional services on mobile devices is often complex and inconvenient, requiring extensive user input on devices with limited interfaces, which may discourage consumers from using such services. (’210 Patent, col. 1:8-24).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention describes a system where a user can manage a service by simply tapping their device on or near a "bearer tag" (e.g., an NFC tag or barcode). The user's device detects the tap, determines service information from the tag, generates a service management request, and initiates transmission of that request to a services platform. This platform manages the service (e.g., activation, billing) according to a pre-existing billing arrangement, streamlining the entire process. (’210 Patent, Abstract; col. 3:9-41).
  • Technical Importance: This method simplifies the "service acquisition" process to a single user action (a tap), aiming to reduce friction for consumers and promote greater discovery and use of available mobile services. (’210 Patent, col. 1:19-24).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts independent claim 1. (Compl. ¶123).
  • Independent Claim 1 (Storage Medium Claim) requires instructions that cause a processor to:
    • Detect a tap of a user equipment on or near a bearer tag.
    • Initiate determination of service information from the bearer tag.
    • Generate one or more service management requests based on that information.
    • Initiate transmission of the requests to a services platform for management according to a billing arrangement.
    • The management of services includes activating, modifying, discovering, accessing, or setting up the services.
  • The complaint reserves the right to assert dependent claims 2-17. (Compl. ¶121).

U.S. Patent No. 9,641,994 - "Method and apparatus for managing services using bearer tags"

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent, related to the ’210 patent, describes a method for managing services via a bearer tag tap. It adds the requirement that service management requests undergo a validation process based on restrictions such as the geographic location of the service and user equipment, and the validity date for the location restriction. (’994 Patent, col. 21:58-col. 22:20).
  • Asserted Claims: The complaint asserts independent claim 1. (Compl. ¶192).
  • Accused Features: The complaint alleges that the VUSION platform’s ability to offer store-specific, time-sensitive promotions (e.g., "local in-day deals") that are restricted to a customer's current store location and are valid for a specific date range meets the limitations of this patent. (Compl. ¶¶239, 246, 247).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

Product Identification

  • The accused instrumentality is SES-imagotag’s Retail Solution System, collectively referred to as "VUSION" or "VUSION Platform." (Compl. ¶2).

Functionality and Market Context

  • The VUSION platform is described as an in-store retail technology system comprising electronic shelf labels (ESLs), access points, and a central server, which can be a cloud-based "VUSION cloud" or an in-store "core appliance." (Compl. ¶¶36, 57-58). The complaint alleges the ESLs are equipped with multiple communication technologies, including 2.4GHz radio for server communication and Near Field Communication (NFC) for interaction with smartphones. (Compl. ¶¶39, 67).
  • The system enables functionalities such as dynamic pricing, product information display, and interactive shopping experiences where customers or staff can use NFC-enabled devices to get more information, perform an automated checkout, or update inventory data on the ESL display. (Compl. ¶¶44, 47, 51, 54). The complaint presents evidence, such as a marketing diagram showing a conceptual VUSION-enabled store, to illustrate this integrated functionality. (Compl. ¶35, Ex. C at 34).
  • The complaint alleges VUSION is a leading platform, used in 4,000 stores with nearly 20 million labels managed in the VUSION cloud, and is marketed as "the world's leading in-store retail technology player." (Compl. ¶¶32, 56).

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

’216 Patent Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 1) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
a background server, a base station, an electronic tag device and an external device The VUSION system allegedly includes the VUSION cloud or in-store core appliance (background server), access points (base station), VUSION ESLs (electronic tag device), and NFC-enabled smartphones (external device). ¶¶57, 59, 63-65 col. 6:25-29
the electronic tag device comprises two communication paths: a first communication path and a second communication path The VUSION ESLs allegedly use a 2.4GHz radio protocol for communication with access points (first path) and NFC for communication with smartphones (second path). ¶¶67, 70, 73 col. 6:29-32
the first communication path supports two monitoring modes: a normal monitoring mode and a fast monitoring mode Plaintiff provides its own electrical current measurements of a VUSION ESL, alleging they show a periodic, low-power peaking behavior every 15 seconds ("normal monitoring mode") that is interrupted by a sustained, higher-power peak lasting 1.2 seconds immediately after an NFC interaction ("fast monitoring mode"). A screenshot of an oscilloscope showing this behavior is provided as evidence. (Compl. ¶82, Ex. of measurement). ¶¶75, 78, 81, 86 col. 6:32-35
the base station is further configured to...communicate with the electronic tag device in the fast wake-up mode, and transmit a fast wake-up instruction...to the electronic tag device Upon receiving data originating from an NFC interaction, an access point allegedly enters a "fast wake-up mode" to relay instructions from the server back to the ESL. Plaintiff provides spectral measurements of an access point's signal, alleging they show behavior matching the claimed fast mode. ¶¶92, 105 col. 6:43-50
the electronic tag device is further configured to...switch to the normal monitoring mode after completing the communication Plaintiff alleges that its measurements show that after the sustained peak corresponding to the NFC-triggered communication, the VUSION ESL's current draw "regresses to the periodically peaking pattern" of the normal mode. ¶¶106-107 col. 6:50-53
  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Evidentiary Questions: A central issue may be whether the plaintiff-generated electrical and spectral measurements (Compl. ¶¶77, 87) are sufficient and credible evidence to prove that the accused VUSION products actually operate in distinct software/hardware states that meet the claim limitations of "normal monitoring mode," "fast monitoring mode," and "fast wake-up mode."
    • Scope Questions: The analysis may question whether the observed behaviors, even if accurately measured, correspond to the specific functional modes described in the patent, or if they are merely standard operational artifacts of wireless communication.

’210 Patent Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 1) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to at least perform the following: The VUSION platform allegedly uses "Jeegy S software," which is described as the "nerve center" of the solution and can be installed in-store or on a cloud solution. This software, residing on a non-transitory medium, is alleged to perform the claimed steps. ¶¶124-126 col. 2:27-35
detecting a tap of a user equipment on or near a bearer tag The complaint alleges that Jeegy S software supports "NFC shopping" by detecting when a user taps an Android phone (user equipment) on a VUSION digital price tag (bearer tag). Marketing materials showing customers tapping phones on tags are cited. A video still from a marketing video depicts a user tapping a phone to an ESL to retrieve product information. (Compl. ¶135, Ex. I at 00:47). ¶¶134-135 col. 3:15-17
initiating determination of service information, related to one or more services, from the bearer tag When a user taps a tag, the user is allegedly "automatically redirected to a URL." The complaint asserts that through this URL, which is tied to the specific tag, the system determines information related to services like purchasing a product or subscribing to deliveries. ¶¶143-144, 146 col. 3:17-19
generating one or more service management requests to manage the one or more services according to the service information After a user views product information via the tap, the system presents a "Pay now" button. Clicking this allegedly generates a service management request to purchase the product. The complaint also alleges that requests to subscribe or collect coupons are generated in this manner. ¶¶166, 168, 170 col. 3:19-21
initiating transmission of the one or more service management requests to a services platform for management of the one or more services according to a billing arrangement The purchase request is allegedly transmitted from the user's mobile device to the SES-imagotag platform (services platform), which manages the purchase service according to a billing arrangement between the retailer and the customer. ¶¶174, 176 col. 3:21-24
  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Scope Questions: A primary question may be whether redirecting a user to a URL after a tap meets the limitation of "initiating determination of service information... from the bearer tag." The defense could argue the tag is merely a passive link trigger and all service information is determined from a web server, not the tag itself.
    • Technical Questions: The analysis may focus on what information is actually stored on and read from the VUSION ESL's NFC chip versus what is retrieved from the VUSION cloud, and how that maps to the claim requirement that the determination is initiated "from the bearer tag."

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

  • Term: "fast monitoring mode" (’216 Patent, Claim 1)

    • Context and Importance: The distinction between "normal" and "fast" monitoring modes is the core of the ’216 invention's solution to the battery vs. responsiveness problem. The definition of this term will be critical to determining if the accused VUSION ESLs, as measured by Plaintiff, actually practice the invention.
    • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
      • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The specification describes the mode functionally, stating that in response to an external interaction, the tag "enter[s] a fast monitoring mode" to provide "immediate feedback." (’216 Patent, col. 1:50-54). This could support a construction based on the function of enabling rapid communication, regardless of the specific electrical signature.
      • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The patent contrasts the "fast monitoring mode" with the default "normal monitoring mode," which involves waking up periodically (e.g., every 30s) to check for requests. (’216 Patent, col. 1:25-29). This suggests the "fast monitoring mode" is a distinct operational state that deviates from this periodic, power-saving behavior, potentially aligning with the sustained activity peak shown in Plaintiff's measurements. (Compl. ¶82).

  • Term: "initiating determination of service information... from the bearer tag" (’210 Patent, Claim 1)

    • Context and Importance: This term is central to the infringement allegation against the VUSION system's NFC-tap-to-website feature. Whether the accused system determines information from the tag, or merely uses the tag as a trigger to determine information from a server, will be a key point of dispute.
    • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
      • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The claim requires "initiating determination... from the bearer tag," which could be argued to cover a process that begins at the tag, even if the bulk of the information is ultimately retrieved from a networked source identified by the tag. The patent describes the system as one where "reading the service information from the bearer tag... quickly identifies the requested service." (’210 Patent, col. 5:12-14).
      • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The word "from" may suggest a more direct sourcing of the information. The specification states the bearer tag "contains information related to the one or more corresponding services." (’210 Patent, col. 4:51-53). This could support a narrower construction requiring that substantive service details, not just a URL, are read directly from the tag's memory.

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The complaint alleges both induced and contributory infringement for all three patents. Inducement is based on allegations that Defendant provides documentation, data sheets, and instructions that encourage and enable its customers to use the VUSION system in an infringing manner. (Compl. ¶¶257, 266, 275).
  • Willful Infringement: Willfulness is alleged for all three patents. The basis for willfulness is alleged knowledge of the patents "at least as of the date when it was notified of the filing of this action," indicating a theory of post-suit willfulness. (Compl. ¶¶259, 268, 277).

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

  • A core issue will be one of evidentiary proof: Will Plaintiff's proprietary electrical and spectral measurements of the accused VUSION products be accepted as sufficient and credible evidence to demonstrate the existence of the specific "normal monitoring mode" and "fast monitoring mode" required by the ’216 patent claims?
  • A key question of claim scope will be one of functional location: Does the accused VUSION system—where tapping an ESL with a phone launches a web page that provides service options—perform the claimed step of "initiating determination of service information... from the bearer tag" (’210 patent), or does the tag merely function as a hyperlink trigger for a separate, server-based process outside the scope of the claims?
  • The case may also turn on a system architecture question: Can the various discrete components of the accused VUSION platform (cloud server, in-store appliance, access points, ESLs, third-party smartphones) be properly mapped onto the more integrated system elements described in the patents, or is there a fundamental mismatch in the claimed versus accused architectures?