DCT

2:23-cv-00228

GenghisComm Holdings LLC v. Toyota Motor North America Inc

Log In

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: GenghisComm Holdings, LLC v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc., 2:23-cv-00228, E.D. Tex., 05/24/2023
  • Venue Allegations: Venue is alleged to be proper in the Eastern District of Texas because the Toyota defendants have regular and established places of business in the District and have allegedly committed acts of patent infringement there.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s vehicles equipped with LTE cellular connectivity infringe four patents related to wireless communication signal processing, specifically techniques for pre-coding signals in multi-carrier systems to reduce peak-to-average power ratio.
  • Technical Context: The technology pertains to methods for generating uplink signals in 4G LTE wireless networks, a standard known as Single-Carrier Frequency-Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA), which is designed for efficient power usage in mobile devices.
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint alleges that on September 14, 2021, Plaintiff’s counsel sent a letter to Defendant with detailed claim charts for three of the four patents-in-suit, placing Defendant on notice of the alleged infringement. This pre-suit notice is the basis for allegations of willful infringement.

Case Timeline

Date Event
2001-04-26 Earliest Priority Date (’842 Patent, ’227 Patent)
2004-08-02 Earliest Priority Date (’568 Patent, ’786 Patent)
2017-09-19 U.S. Patent No. 9,768,842 Issues
2019-02-05 U.S. Patent No. 10,200,227 Issues
2019-08-20 U.S. Patent No. 10,389,568 Issues
2021-07-27 U.S. Patent No. 11,075,786 Issues
2021-09-14 Plaintiff sends notice letter to Defendant regarding '842, '227, '568 Patents
2023-05-24 Complaint Filed

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 9,768,842 - “Pre-coding in multi-user MIMO”

  • Issued: September 19, 2017
  • The Invention Explained:
    • Problem Addressed: The patent family addresses inter-cell interference as a "primary bottleneck for spectral efficiency" in cellular networks and also seeks to reduce a transmission signal's peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR), a known challenge in Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) systems (’227 Patent, col. 2:18-19; ’842 Patent, Abstract).
    • The Patented Solution: The invention describes a transmitter that uses a "DFT spreader" to apply Fourier coefficients to data symbols before they are modulated onto OFDM subcarriers. This pre-coding step spreads the data across the subcarriers in a way that, when the subcarriers are combined into a final signal, results in a superposition with a reduced PAPR. (’842 Patent, Abstract; ’227 Patent, col. 8:58-67).
    • Technical Importance: This technique, known commercially as Single-Carrier Frequency-Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA), was adopted as the uplink transmission standard for 4G LTE because it maintains many benefits of OFDM while achieving a lower PAPR, which is critical for power-constrained devices like mobile phones and vehicle hotspots (Compl. ¶40).
  • Key Claims at a Glance:
    • The complaint asserts independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶36).
    • Essential elements of Claim 1:
      • An OFDM transmitter, comprising:
      • an OFDM spreader configured to spread a plurality of data symbols with Fourier coefficients to generate a discrete Fourier Transform (DFT)-spread data signal;
      • a mapper configured to map the DFT-spread data signal to a plurality of OFDM subcarriers; and
      • an OFDM modulator configured to modulate the DFT-spread data signal onto the plurality of OFDM subcarriers to produce an OFDM transmission signal comprising a superposition of the OFDM subcarriers, wherein the OFDM spreader is configured to provide the superposition with a reduced peak-to-average power ratio.
    • The complaint also asserts dependent claims 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, and 9 (Compl. ¶¶48-99).

U.S. Patent No. 10,200,227 - “Pre-coding in multi-user MIMO”

  • Issued: February 5, 2019
  • The Invention Explained:
    • Problem Addressed: As with the related ’842 Patent, this patent addresses the technical challenges of inter-cell interference and high PAPR in wireless communication systems (’227 Patent, col. 2:1-19).
    • The Patented Solution: The patent claims an apparatus, comprising a processor and non-transitory memory, with instructions to execute a specific three-step signal generation process. First, it performs an "invertible transform" (e.g., a DFT) on data symbols to create spread data symbols. Second, it maps these spread symbols to a selection of OFDM subcarriers. Third, it performs an M-point inverse DFT on the subcarriers to generate a final time-domain signal, where the initial invertible transform is configured to ensure the final signal has a reduced PAPR. (’227 Patent, Claim 22; Fig. 31).
    • Technical Importance: This patent claims the apparatus that implements the SC-FDMA signal generation process, covering the specific hardware and software instructions required to execute a core function of the 4G LTE uplink standard (Compl. ¶¶103, 105).
  • Key Claims at a Glance:
    • The complaint asserts independent claim 22 (Compl. ¶102).
    • Essential elements of Claim 22:
      • An apparatus comprising a processor and a non-transitory memory with instructions to:
      • perform an invertible transform on a set of data symbols to generate N spread data symbols using complex-valued spreading codes;
      • map the N spread data symbols to at least N subcarriers of a plurality M of OFDM subcarriers to generate complex subcarrier amplitudes; and
      • perform an M-point inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT) on the amplitudes to generate a time-domain sequence comprising a superposition of the OFDM subcarriers, wherein the invertible transform is configured to provide the superposition with a reduced peak-to-average power ratio.
    • The complaint also asserts dependent claims 24, 25, 26, and 28 (Compl. ¶¶117-148).

U.S. Patent No. 10,389,568 - “Single carrier frequency division multiple access baseband signal generation”

  • Issued: August 20, 2019
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent claims an apparatus with a processor and memory for generating an SC-FDMA signal. The claimed instructions include dividing a block of symbols into multiple sets, applying transform precoding to each set, and then generating a final OFDM signal with a reduced PAPR. The invention covers the fundamental process of preparing data symbols for an SC-FDMA transmission as specified in the LTE standard (Compl. ¶¶151, 156, 159).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 24 is asserted (Compl. ¶151).
  • Accused Features: The accused functionality is the SC-FDMA baseband signal generation performed by the telematics/LTE modules in Toyota vehicles for uplink communication, which allegedly practices the claimed steps of dividing, precoding, and generating the signal (Compl. ¶¶152, 153, 156).

U.S. Patent No. 11,075,786 - “Multicarrier sub-layer for direct sequence channel and multiple-access coding”

  • Issued: July 27, 2021
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent claims a communication apparatus that uses a "first set of complex-valued codes" for encoding data and a "second set of complex-valued codes" for decoding the received signal, where the two sets are complex conjugates of each other. The claimed process involves selecting subcarriers, encoding data symbols with the first set of codes, and applying them to the subcarriers to produce a spread-OFDM signal. This describes the symmetric encoding/decoding relationship inherent in using a DFT for precoding at the transmitter and an inverse transform for decoding at the receiver (Compl. ¶¶226, 229, 233).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 10 is asserted (Compl. ¶226).
  • Accused Features: The accused apparatus is the LTE module in Toyota vehicles, which performs transform precoding (encoding with a first set of complex codes via a DFT) for uplink transmissions. The complaint alleges that the base station (eNodeB) then decodes the signal using an inverse transform (a second set of codes that are the inverse, or complex conjugate, of the first set) (Compl. ¶229).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

  • Product Identification: The accused instrumentalities are Toyota and Lexus vehicles equipped with LTE network connectivity, which provide features such as in-car Wi-Fi hotspots. The complaint collectively refers to them as the "Accused Toyota LTE Devices" (Compl. ¶¶6, 26).
  • Functionality and Market Context: The accused devices contain a telematics/LTE module that communicates with cellular networks in accordance with 3GPP LTE standards (Compl. ¶6). The functionality at issue is the module's generation of uplink signals using SC-FDMA, a process the complaint alleges is a form of DFT-spread OFDM (Compl. ¶40). The complaint alleges that all of Toyota's vehicles, including top-selling models such as the RAV4, Camry, and Corolla, are installed with these devices, positioning Toyota as a major user of the accused technology in the U.S. automotive market (Compl. ¶¶7, 8, 26).

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

U.S. Patent No. 9,768,842 Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 1) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
an OFDM spreader configured to spread a plurality of data symbols with Fourier coefficients to generate a discrete Fourier Transform (DFT)-spread data signal; The accused devices perform "Transform precoding" according to the 3GPP LTE standard, which uses a DFT to spread data symbols across multiple subcarriers. A visual from the complaint shows the 3GPP standard's equation for this transform precoding step (Compl. p. 9). ¶41 col. 8:58-67
a mapper configured to map the DFT-spread data signal to a plurality of OFDM subcarriers; The accused devices map the spread data signals to physical resource elements (subcarriers) as required by the LTE standard's section on "Mapping to Physical Resources." ¶42 col. 8:61-62
an OFDM modulator configured to modulate the DFT-spread data signal onto the plurality of OFDM subcarriers to produce an OFDM transmission signal comprising a superposition of the OFDM subcarriers, wherein the OFDM spreader is configured to provide the superposition with a reduced peak-to-average power ratio. The accused devices perform "SC-FDMA baseband signal generation" per the LTE standard, which modulates the mapped symbols onto OFDM subcarriers to generate a time-domain signal. The complaint alleges the transform precoding step provides the resulting signal with a lower PAPR compared to standard OFDM. A visual from the complaint shows the 3GPP standard's equation for baseband signal generation (Compl. p. 10). ¶¶41, 43 col. 8:65-67
  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Scope Questions: A primary question will be whether a transmitter that generates an "SC-FDMA" signal, as specified by the LTE standard, falls within the scope of the claimed "OFDM transmitter." The complaint asserts that an SC-FDMA signal is a "modulated OFDM signal" (Compl. ¶40), a characterization that may be disputed.
    • Technical Questions: The analysis may focus on whether the "Transform precoding" block in an LTE device is structurally and functionally equivalent to the claimed "OFDM spreader." While both use a DFT, the court may need to determine if the specific manner of "spreading...with Fourier coefficients" described in the patent is indistinct from the process mandated by the 3GPP standard.

U.S. Patent No. 10,200,227 Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 22) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
perform an invertible transform on a set of data symbols to generate a plurality N of spread data symbols, the invertible transform comprising complex-valued spreading codes; The memory in the accused devices contains instructions to perform "transform precoding" using a DFT, which the complaint alleges is an invertible transform that generates spread data symbols using complex-valued codes. A visual from the complaint displays the 3GPP equation for this process (Compl. p. 21). ¶¶106, 107 col. 8:58-60
map the N spread data symbols to at least N subcarriers of a plurality M of Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) subcarriers to generate a set of complex subcarrier amplitudes; The accused devices' memory includes instructions to map the N spread data signals onto N subcarriers from a total available uplink bandwidth of M subcarriers, consistent with the LTE standard. ¶108 col. 8:61-62
perform an M-point inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT) on the set of complex subcarrier amplitudes to generate a time-domain sequence...wherein the invertible transform is configured to provide the superposition with a reduced peak-to-average power ratio. The memory includes instructions for "SC-FDMA baseband signal generation," which uses an M-point inverse DFT to generate the final time-domain signal. The complaint alleges that the initial invertible transform (the DFT precoding) is the step configured to provide the resulting signal with a reduced PAPR. A visual from the complaint shows the 3GPP equation for this generation step (Compl. p. 23). ¶¶110, 107 col. 8:62-67
  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Scope Questions: A potential issue is the relationship between N (the number of spread symbols) and M (the size of the IDFT). The claim requires performing an M-point IDFT after mapping N symbols to at least N subcarriers within a plurality of M subcarriers. The infringement theory depends on showing that the accused devices' process, where M > N (Compl. ¶112), aligns with this claimed structure.
    • Technical Questions: The dispute may center on the "configured to" limitation. The question is whether the initial "invertible transform" (DFT) in the accused LTE process is specifically "configured to provide" PAPR reduction, as the claim requires, or whether the PAPR reduction is an inherent property of the overall SC-FDMA standard, which is implemented for other primary reasons (e.g., creating a single-carrier waveform).

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

  • The Term: "OFDM spreader" (’842 Patent, Claim 1)

    • Context and Importance: This term is central to the infringement analysis for the ’842 Patent. Whether the "Transform precoding" function in the accused LTE devices meets this definition will be a critical point of contention. Practitioners may focus on this term because the accused devices are designed to an "SC-FDMA" standard, not explicitly an "OFDM" standard for uplink, and this term bridges that gap.
    • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
      • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The specification describes the spreader as a "DFT spreader" that applies "Fourier coefficients" to data symbols, and the abstract states its function is to reduce PAPR (’842 Patent, Abstract). This could support a functional definition covering any DFT-based pre-coding block that achieves this result.
      • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The patent figures depict the "DFT Spreader" as a discrete block within a larger system diagram (’227 Patent, Fig. 30A, block 3021). This could support an argument that the term requires a specific structural component rather than a mathematical step integrated into a standardized signal generation process.

  • The Term: "invertible transform is configured to provide the superposition with a reduced peak-to-average power ratio" (’227 Patent, Claim 22)

    • Context and Importance: This limitation links the function (PAPR reduction) to a specific element (the invertible transform). Infringement hinges on whether the DFT used in the accused devices is "configured to" achieve this purpose, rather than it being an incidental benefit.
    • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
      • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The patent's abstract states that the "Fourier coefficients reduce the transmission signal's peak to average power," suggesting the transform itself is the source of the benefit (’227 Patent, Abstract). This may support an argument that any transform that inherently causes this effect is "configured to" do so.
      • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The term "configured to" may imply intent or specific design. A defendant could argue that the DFT in the LTE standard is configured primarily to create a single-carrier waveform characteristic, and that the reduced PAPR is a known but secondary effect of that primary configuration, not what the transform is "configured to provide."

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The complaint includes a general allegation that Toyota continued to "induce the infringement" after receiving notice, but does not plead specific facts supporting intent for inducement separate from its direct infringement and willfulness claims (Compl. ¶34).
  • Willful Infringement: The complaint alleges pre-suit knowledge of the ’842, ’227, and ’568 patents based on a detailed notice letter, including 107 pages of claim charts, sent on September 14, 2021 (Compl. ¶27). The complaint alleges that Toyota's infringement continued despite this knowledge and the "objectively high likelihood that its acts constitute patent infringement," forming the basis for willfulness (Compl. ¶271). Willfulness for the ’786 Patent is based on notice provided by the complaint itself (Compl. ¶33).

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

  • A core issue will be one of technical equivalence: does the accused SC-FDMA signal generation process, as mandated by the 3GPP LTE standard, map element-for-element onto the claimed DFT-spread OFDM transmitter and apparatus, or are there fundamental operational or structural differences?
  • A key question for claim construction will be one of definitional scope: can terms like "OFDM spreader" be construed broadly enough to read on the "Transform precoding" block of a standards-compliant SC-FDMA device, or do the patent specifications limit the terms to an implementation distinct from that standard?
  • A central evidentiary question will be one of knowledge and intent: given the allegation of a detailed pre-suit notice letter, was Toyota's continued use of LTE technology after September 14, 2021, objectively reckless, thereby justifying a finding of willful infringement and potential enhanced damages?