DCT

2:25-cv-00217

Aardvark Medical Inc v. Guangdong Xinruntao Technology Co Ltd

Log In

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 2:25-cv-00217, E.D. Tex., 02/18/2025
  • Venue Allegations: Plaintiff alleges venue is proper because Defendants are foreign companies that may be sued in any judicial district. It is further alleged that Defendants place the accused products into the stream of commerce, which terminates in the Eastern District of Texas through sales on platforms like Amazon and a dedicated product website.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendants’ Gailyus Nasal Irrigation System infringes five U.S. patents related to handheld devices that provide nasal irrigation and aspiration.
  • Technical Context: The technology concerns portable medical devices designed to alleviate nasal and sinus congestion by flushing the nasal cavity with a fluid (irrigation) while simultaneously removing that fluid and mucus (aspiration).
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint does not mention any prior litigation, Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings, or licensing history related to the patents-in-suit.

Case Timeline

Date Event
2006-11-06 Patent Priority Date for all Patents-in-Suit
2017-09-05 U.S. Patent No. 9,750,856 Issues
2022-05-03 U.S. Patent No. 11,318,234 Issues
2024-01-30 U.S. Patent No. 11,883,009 Issues
2024-01-30 U.S. Patent No. 11,883,010 Issues
2024-02-06 U.S. Patent No. 11,889,995 Issues
2025-02-18 Complaint Filed

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 9,750,856 - "Irrigation and Aspiration Device and Method"

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent family background describes nasal and sinus congestion as a ubiquitous problem for which existing home-use treatments are often inadequate (Compl. ¶15; ’234 Patent, col. 1:36-42). Manual aspirators, for example, are described as being variably effective and awkward to use, especially for infants, while typical sinus irrigators do not solve the problem of painful evacuation or blowing (’234 Patent, col. 2:20-29).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention is a handheld, portable device that combines both nasal irrigation and aspiration functions into a single unit (’234 Patent, Abstract). It features a nozzle tip designed to form an effective seal with the nostril, allowing it to simultaneously deliver an irrigant fluid (e.g., saline) into the nasal cavity and suction the fluid and mucus out into a separate collection reservoir (’234 Patent, col. 3:9-41). The device structure separates the irrigation and aspiration fluid paths to prevent contamination (’234 Patent, Figs. 3, 6).
  • Technical Importance: This integrated approach aims to provide a more effective, faster, and easier-to-use solution for home-based nasal care than using separate, less effective tools for irrigation and suctioning (’234 Patent, col. 3:11-20).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts infringement of at least independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶21).
  • The essential elements of independent claim 1 include:
    • A portable, handheld device for irrigating and aspirating.
    • A body, a first neck, and a first head connected to the body.
    • The first head comprises a compliant outer surface configured to seal against a nostril and is configured to be detachable from the body.
    • A first port in the head configured to deliver an irrigant outside the head, connected to an irrigant reservoir via a first channel.
    • A second port configured to receive an aspirant from outside the head, connected to an aspirant reservoir via a second channel.
    • The first channel is located "to one side of the second channel."
    • A fluid control system with a pump configured to control both irrigation delivery pressure and aspiration pressure.
  • The complaint does not explicitly reserve the right to assert dependent claims but refers to "one or more claims" of the patent (Compl. ¶19).

U.S. Patent No. 11,318,234 - "Irrigation and Aspiration Device and Method"

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: As a continuation within the same patent family, the ’234 Patent addresses the same technical problems of providing an effective and easy-to-use home nasal irrigation and aspiration system (’234 Patent, col. 1:36-2:19).
  • The Patented Solution: The ’234 Patent claims a portable handheld device with a similar combination of irrigation and aspiration functions, comprising a body and a removable head with separate reservoirs and channels (’234 Patent, col. 3:21-41). This patent's claims, however, recite a highly detailed set of structural and spatial relationships between numerous components, including multiple ports, channels, and reservoirs, defining their relative positions (e.g., proximal, distal, between, on opposite sides) when the head is connected to the body (’234 Patent, col. 37:57-39:23).
  • Technical Importance: The detailed structural limitations claimed in this patent suggest an inventive focus on a specific, optimized physical layout of the device's components, potentially to enhance performance, ergonomics, or fluid dynamics (’234 Patent, col. 5:1-6:13).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts infringement of at least independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶41).
  • Independent claim 1 is exceptionally long and recites a portable handheld device with numerous elements, including a compliant surface, body, head, irrigant and aspirant reservoirs, multiple ports (first irrigant, second irrigant, aspirant), multiple channels (first, second, third), and a pump. The claim is primarily defined by an extensive list of specific spatial relationships between these elements when the head is removably connected to the body, such as:
    • The first channel is to one side of, and its axis is offset from, the second channel's axis.
    • The first and second channels are located between various ports and reservoirs.
    • Certain ports are the same distance from the body, while others are distal to a second irrigant port.
    • The reservoirs are on opposite sides of the device.
    • The ports and channels are "articulatable relative to the body."
  • The complaint refers to "one or more claims" of the patent (Compl. ¶39).

U.S. Patent No. 11,883,009 - "Irrigation and Aspiration Device and Method"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 11,883,009, entitled “Irrigation and Aspiration Device and Method,” issued January 30, 2024.
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent claims a portable handheld device for nasal irrigation and aspiration defined by a detailed set of structural and spatial relationships similar to the ’234 Patent. A distinguishing feature of its independent claim is the explicit configuration of the device to "aspirate alone, irrigate alone, sequentially aspirate and irrigate, sequentially irrigate and aspirate, or simultaneously aspirate and irrigate." (’009 Patent, col. 39:6-10).
  • Asserted Claims: At least independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶73).
  • Accused Features: The complaint alleges the Gailyus product comprises all the structural elements and is configured to perform the various sequential and simultaneous modes of operation claimed (Compl. ¶¶74, 91). An annotated diagram in the complaint, Figure 3, is used to identify the accused components (Compl. ¶74).

U.S. Patent No. 11,883,010 - "Irrigation and Aspiration Device and Method"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 11,883,010, entitled “Irrigation and Aspiration Device and Method,” issued January 30, 2024.
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent claims a nasal irrigation device comprising a "source of saline solution," an "effluent receptacle," a "nasal interface," a "vacuum source," and a "fluid passageway." The claim focuses on the articulatability of the first and second channels relative to the saline source and effluent receptacle, specifying that the channel ends can be positioned at the same distance from the saline source in two different positions (’010 Patent, col. 37:58-38:32).
  • Asserted Claims: At least independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶101).
  • Accused Features: The complaint maps the accused product's features to the claimed elements, identifying the "Clean Water Tank" as the saline source and the "Waste Water Tank" as the effluent receptacle (Compl. ¶102; Fig. 4). The allegation of channel articulatability is based on the malleable nature of the product's nasal interface (Compl. ¶103).

U.S. Patent No. 11,889,995 - "Irrigation and Aspiration Device and Method"

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 11,889,995, entitled “Irrigation and Aspiration Device and Method,” issued February 6, 2024.
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent claims a portable handheld device comprising a body, a tip to seal against a nostril, a port, a channel, and a "tip interface removably connectable to the body." The claim requires that the channel and the tip/tip interface be "rotatable relative to the body" and that the device can perform sequential or simultaneous aspiration and irrigation (’995 Patent, col. 37:50-38:16).
  • Asserted Claims: At least independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶114).
  • Accused Features: The complaint alleges the Gailyus product meets these limitations, identifying the components in an annotated diagram, Figure 5 (Compl. ¶115). The "rotatable" limitation is allegedly met because the channel runs through a compliant, malleable tip interface that can be moved into various positions (Compl. ¶118-119).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

Product Identification

  • The Gailyus Nasal Irrigation System (the "Accused Product") (Compl. ¶16).

Functionality and Market Context

  • The Accused Product is a portable, battery-powered handheld device designed for nasal irrigation and aspiration (Compl. ¶¶22, 31). It consists of a main body and a detachable head that includes a compliant surface with two "Nose Pillows" for engaging a user's nostril (Compl. ¶24). The device contains separate reservoirs identified as a "Clean Water Tank" (irrigant reservoir) and a "Waste Water Tank" (aspirant reservoir) (Compl. Fig. 1). A pump within the device is alleged to control pressure for delivering irrigant (e.g., saline) and aspirating mucus and fluid (Compl. ¶31).
  • The complaint alleges the product is sold to customers in the district through Amazon.com and the website gailyus.com, where it is marketed as a "Sinus Rinse Machine" for relief of nasal symptoms (Compl. ¶¶6-7; p. 3-4). The complaint provides an annotated diagram of the Gailyus product, Figure 1, identifying key external and internal components corresponding to the patent claims (Compl. ¶21).

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

U.S. Patent No. 9,750,856 Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 1) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
a portable, handheld device for irrigating with an irrigant and aspirating biological tissue and/or secretions The Accused Product is a portable handheld device used for nasal irrigation and aspiration (Compl. Fig. 1). ¶22 col. 11:30-33
a body; a first neck; a first head connected to the body... The Accused Product comprises a body, a first neck, and a first head connected to the body, as shown in the annotated diagram (Compl. Fig. 1). ¶23 col. 12:4-6
wherein the first head comprises a compliant outer surface configured to seal against a nostril... The head of the Accused Product contains two "Nose Pillows," which are alleged to be a compliant surface that seals against the nostril. ¶24 col. 15:36-39
...and wherein the first head is configured to be detached from the body... The first head of the Accused Product is detachable from its body (Compl. Fig. 1). ¶24 col. 15:61-64
an irrigant reservoir in direct fluid communication with the first port... The Accused Product contains an irrigant reservoir ("Clean Water Tank") that is in fluid communication with the first port to dispense irrigant (Compl. Fig. 1). ¶26 col. 12:10-12
a second channel in the first head... wherein the first channel is to one side of the second channel... The Accused Product has a first and second channel, with the first channel located to one side of the second channel as depicted in the annotated diagram (Compl. Fig. 1). ¶29 col. 18:35-39
a fluid control system comprising a pump, wherein the fluid control system is configured to control an irrigation delivery pressure... and... an aspiration pressure... The Accused Product has a battery-powered pump that allegedly controls the pressure to deliver saline (irrigation) and controls the aspiration pressure into the head. ¶31 col. 12:4-9

U.S. Patent No. 11,318,234 Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 1) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
a portable handheld device for irrigating and aspirating comprising: a compliant surface engageable with a nose; a body; a head; an irrigant reservoir; an aspirant reservoir... and a pump... The Accused Product is identified as a portable handheld device with these components. The compliant surface is the "Nose Pillows," and the pump generates pressure to irrigate the nose (Compl. Fig. 2). ¶42 col. 37:54-66
...wherein the head... are removably connectable to the body... The head, reservoirs, ports, and channels of the Accused Product are alleged to be part of the head assembly, which is removably connectable to the body (Compl. Fig. 2). ¶42 col. 38:1-5
wherein when the head is removably connected... the irrigant reservoir and the aspirant reservoir are on opposite sides of the portable handheld device... The complaint alleges that the product's "Clean Water Tank" (irrigant reservoir) and "Waste Water Tank" (aspirant reservoir) are located on opposite sides of the device as shown in Figure 2. ¶56 col. 38:52-55
wherein when the head is removably connected... the first irrigant port and the aspirant port are articulatable relative to the body... The compliant "Nose Pillows" surface of the Accused Product can allegedly flex and bend, which allows the position of the first irrigant port and aspirant port to be articulated relative to the body. ¶59 col. 38:64-67
wherein the irrigant reservoir comprises a first tapered shape, wherein the aspirant reservoir comprises a second tapered shape, and wherein the first tapered shape is different than the second tapered shape. The complaint alleges, with reference to Figure 2, that the irrigant and aspirant reservoirs have different tapered shapes. The annotated diagram, Figure 2, shows reservoirs with differing geometries (Compl. Fig. 2). ¶63 col. 39:19-23

Identified Points of Contention

  • Scope Questions: A central issue may be the construction of "articulatable relative to the body," a limitation found in the ’234 patent and others. The complaint asserts this is met by the ability of the product's compliant "Nose Pillows" to "flex and bend" (Compl. ¶59). The question for the court will be whether mere material flexibility satisfies the term "articulatable," which could be construed to require a more distinct mechanical joint or hinge.
  • Technical Questions: The infringement allegations for the ’234, ’009, ’010, and ’995 patents rely heavily on a multitude of precise spatial limitations (e.g., "proximal," "distal," "between," "on opposite sides"). The complaint uses annotated product diagrams as the primary evidence for these relationships (Compl. ¶¶43-63; Fig. 2). A key factual question will be whether these external diagrams are sufficient to prove that the internal and external components of the Accused Product meet every one of the dozens of specific geometric and positional relationships required by the claims.

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

  • The Term: "compliant outer surface configured to seal against a nostril" (’856 Patent, Claim 1)

  • Context and Importance: This term is fundamental to the device's operation, as the quality of the "seal" affects the efficiency of both irrigation and aspiration. Practitioners may focus on this term because the nature of the contact between the accused "Nose Pillows" (Compl. ¶24) and the user's nostril will be scrutinized. Defendants may argue that the pillows provide comfort but do not create the type of functional "seal" required by the patent.

  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:

    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The specification states the flexible tip can be made from compliant materials like "silicone rubber or foam," suggesting a range of materials can form the surface (’234 Patent, col. 17:60-63). The term "seal" itself is not narrowly defined, which may support a broader construction covering any contact sufficient to enable the device's function.
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The specification describes the tip as making a "positive seal with the irrigation and/or aspiration site" to allow both functions to occur, analogizing it to a "ball and socket joint" (’234 Patent, col. 18:50-56). This language could support a narrower definition requiring a more complete or mechanically robust seal than simple surface compliance might provide.

  • The Term: "articulatable relative to the body" (’234 Patent, Claim 1)

  • Context and Importance: This term is repeated for various ports and channels in the asserted claims of several patents-in-suit. The complaint's theory of infringement for this element rests on the allegation that the compliant nasal tip can "flex and bend" (Compl. ¶59). The dispute will likely center on whether this flexing of a malleable material meets the definition of "articulatable," a term that can imply a mechanical joint or pivot.

  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:

    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The patent's abstract notes the devices may be configured to "aspirate and/or irrigate ... while allowing the device to articulate or flex" (’234 Patent, Abstract). The use of "or flex" alongside "articulate" could suggest the terms were considered related or overlapping in meaning by the inventors.
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The detailed description of some embodiments does not explicitly describe hinges or mechanical joints for the tip. However, the patent repeatedly uses the term "articulatable" in the claims, a term of art that practitioners often associate with mechanical movement between distinct components, which could support a narrower construction that excludes mere material flexing.

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The complaint alleges inducement of infringement based on Defendants' affirmative acts of providing instructions, marketing materials, product manuals, and online documentation that allegedly instruct and encourage customers to use the Accused Product in an infringing manner (Compl. ¶¶32, 64, 92, 105, 120). It also alleges contributory infringement, stating the accused components are material to the inventions, are not staple articles of commerce, have no substantial non-infringing uses, and are known by Defendants to be especially made for infringement (Compl. ¶¶33, 65, 93, 106, 121).
  • Willful Infringement: The complaint alleges that Defendants' infringement is willful, based on alleged knowledge of the patents and intent, or alternatively, willful blindness to the infringement (Compl. ¶¶33, 65). The prayer for relief requests a judgment that the infringement is willful and seeks enhanced damages (Compl. p. 37). The complaint does not, however, plead specific facts establishing pre-suit knowledge of the patents-in-suit.

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

  • A core issue will be one of definitional scope: can terms such as "articulatable" and "rotatable," as claimed for the device's ports and channels, be construed to cover the simple flexing and movement of the accused product's soft, compliant nasal tip, or does the patent language require a more distinct mechanical joint for such movement?
  • A key evidentiary question will be one of structural correspondence: will the complaint's reliance on annotated product diagrams be sufficient to establish that the accused device meets the dozens of specific and precise spatial limitations recited in the asserted claims (e.g., that certain components are "proximal," "distal," "between," or "on opposite sides" of other components in the exact manner required)?