DCT

2:25-cv-00960

Flexiworld Tech Inc v. LG Electronics Inc

Log In
Key Events
Complaint

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 2:25-cv-00960, E.D. Tex., 09/18/2025
  • Venue Allegations: Plaintiff alleges venue is proper for LG Electronics Inc. as a foreign entity under the alien venue rule. Venue for LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. is alleged based on its regular and established places of business within the district, including distribution facilities, and its concession of proper venue in other recent patent cases in the district.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s smart televisions, soundbars, television remotes, and associated applications infringe six patents related to wireless device connectivity, content rendering, and voice-activated control.
  • Technical Context: The technology at issue concerns methods for enabling pervasive wireless communication between consumer electronics, such as mobile devices, smart TVs, and audio systems, to simplify content streaming and device setup.
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint alleges that Plaintiff provided Defendant with notice of the patents-in-suit and the accused infringing products via a letter dated October 1, 2021, nearly four years prior to the filing of the complaint.

Case Timeline

Date Event
2000-11-01 Earliest Priority Date for ’072, ’596, and ’178 Patents
2000-11-20 Earliest Priority Date for ’259 and ’233 Patents
2001-01-19 Earliest Priority Date for ’811 Patent
2015-05-26 ’811 Patent Issued
2017-12-05 ’259 Patent Issued
2018-05-08 ’233 Patent Issued
2018-07-31 ’178 Patent Issued
2018-11-27 ’072 Patent Issued
2018-12-25 ’596 Patent Issued
2021-10-01 Plaintiff’s Notice Letter Sent to Defendant
2025-09-18 Complaint Filing Date

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 9,042,811 - *"Specification of Smart Wireless Television for Rendering Digital Content"*

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,042,811, "Specification of Smart Wireless Television for Rendering Digital Content," issued May 26, 2015 (Compl. ¶38).

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent's background section describes the inconvenience and complexity for users of mobile computing devices who wish to output content to various peripherals (e.g., printers, displays), as this traditionally required installing a dedicated, device-dependent driver for each peripheral (’811 Patent, col. 1:25-34, 2:1-5).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention proposes a system where the processing load for rendering content is shared between a primary information apparatus (e.g., a mobile device) and an output device (e.g., a smart television). The information apparatus performs an initial part of the raster image processing to create "intermediate output data," which it then transmits to the output device. An "output controller" in the television then performs the remaining, computationally intensive processing (e.g., halftoning, color correction) to generate the final image (’811 Patent, Abstract; col. 5:46-6:11).
  • Technical Importance: This distributed processing approach aimed to reduce the memory and computational burden on low-power mobile devices, facilitating "pervasive computing" by allowing them to interface with a wide range of output devices without needing multiple complex drivers (’811 Patent, col. 2:1-24).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts independent claim 1 and dependent claims 2, 5, 6, and 8 (Compl. ¶95).
  • Independent Claim 1 of the ’811 Patent includes the following essential elements:
    • A wireless output device that is a wireless television for rendering digital content.
    • An output controller for processing the digital content.
    • A wireless communication unit for establishing a wireless link.
    • Receiving "intermediate output data" from an information apparatus, which corresponds to the digital content and includes image data encoded with compression.
    • The output controller decodes and processes the intermediate output data into a final format for the output engine.
    • An output engine renders the processed data on a display screen or projection medium.
  • The complaint reserves the right to assert additional claims (Compl. ¶95).

U.S. Patent No. 9,836,259 - *"Televisions, output controllers, or speakers that are setup to wirelessly connect to a network and to receive digital content from a digital content service over the network"*

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,836,259, "Televisions, output controllers, or speakers that are setup to wirelessly connect to a network and to receive digital content from a digital content service over the network," issued December 5, 2017 (Compl. ¶44).

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent addresses the challenge of conveniently connecting output devices like televisions and speakers to a network to access digital content, a process that traditionally could be complex for users, particularly in mobile or unfamiliar environments (’259 Patent, col. 2:1-24).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention describes a method for setting up an output device (e.g., a television or speaker) whereby a user first provides security or authentication information (such as a Wi-Fi password) to the device via its interface. The output device then uses that information to establish a wireless connection to a local area network. Subsequently, the device connects to a server over the network to download software components and then uses those components to receive digital content from a service for playback (’259 Patent, Abstract).
  • Technical Importance: This invention provided a streamlined setup process, enabling consumer electronics to easily connect to network services and become "smart" devices capable of streaming content, a foundational concept for the modern connected home ecosystem (’259 Patent, col. 2:25-44).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts independent claim 1 and dependent claims 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 (Compl. ¶104).
  • Independent Claim 1 of the ’259 Patent includes the following essential elements:
    • A wireless output device (television, speaker, etc.) including an interface, processors, and wireless communication circuitry.
    • Receiving security information via the interface.
    • Establishing a wireless local area network connection using the received security information.
    • Connecting to a server over the network to download software components.
    • Installing the downloaded software components.
    • Using the installed components to receive digital content from a digital content service.
  • The complaint reserves the right to assert additional claims (Compl. ¶104).

U.S. Patent No. 9,965,233 - *"Digital content services or stores over the Internet that transmit or stream protected or encrypted digital content to connected devices and applications that access the digital content services or stores"*

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,965,233, "Digital content services or stores over the Internet that transmit or stream protected or encrypted digital content to connected devices and applications that access the digital content services or stores," issued May 8, 2018 (Compl. ¶50).
  • Technology Synopsis: The patent describes a system where a digital content service generates encrypted, device-dependent output data for a specific, registered device. The service sends authentication information and a reference to the content to a client application on the device, which then uses that information to access the encrypted content for rendering (’233 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 37 and dependent claims 38 and 39 are asserted (Compl. ¶113).
  • Accused Features: The complaint alleges that the Accused TVs, in their operation of streaming protected digital content, infringe the ’233 Patent (Compl. ¶113).

U.S. Patent No. 10,140,072 - *"Sound output system or Internet appliance that supports voice activated commands, and that plays audio data received from a service over a network"*

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 10,140,072, "Sound output system or Internet appliance that supports voice activated commands, and that plays audio data received from a service over a network," issued November 27, 2018 (Compl. ¶56).
  • Technology Synopsis: The patent discloses a sound output system (e.g., a wireless speaker) that can be set up via a smart phone to connect to a network. Once connected, the system can access an audio service and is operable to receive voice-activated commands from a user to control playback (’072 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 1 and dependent claims 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 are asserted (Compl. ¶122).
  • Accused Features: The Accused Soundbars, which allegedly support voice commands and stream audio from network services, are accused of infringing the ’072 Patent (Compl. ¶122).

U.S. Patent No. 10,162,596 - *"Portable electronic device configured to receive voice activated commands and to wirelessly manage or drive an output device"*

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 10,162,596, "Portable electronic device configured to receive voice activated commands and to wirelessly manage or drive an output device," issued December 25, 2018 (Compl. ¶62).
  • Technology Synopsis: The patent describes a portable electronic device (e.g., a remote control) with a microphone and an interface (e.g., buttons). The device receives a user indication via the interface and voice commands via the microphone, and in response, wirelessly sends information to manage or drive an output device (e.g., a television) (’596 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claims 1 and 8 and dependent claims 2, 4-7, 9, and 11-13 are asserted (Compl. ¶131).
  • Accused Features: The Accused TV Remotes and Accused Apps are alleged to embody the claimed portable device that uses voice and button inputs to control an output device (Compl. ¶131).

U.S. Patent No. 10,037,178 - *"Wireless output devices or wireless controllers that support wireless device discovery for establishing wireless connectivity"*

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 10,037,178, "Wireless output devices or wireless controllers that support wireless device discovery for establishing wireless connectivity," issued July 31, 2018 (Compl. ¶68).
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent details a method for establishing a wireless connection where a client device (e.g., a smart phone) performs a wireless discovery operation to find a nearby output device. The output device then provides identification information to the client, and a security procedure is implemented to establish the wireless link (’178 Patent, Abstract).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 13 and dependent claims 14, 15, 16, and 18 are asserted (Compl. ¶140).
  • Accused Features: The Accused TVs and Accused Soundbars are alleged to infringe by participating in wireless discovery and connection-establishment protocols with other devices (Compl. ¶140).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

Product Identification

  • The accused instrumentalities are LG televisions (“Accused TVs”), LG soundbars (“Accused Soundbars”), LG television remotes (“Accused TV Remotes”), and associated applications (“Accused Apps”) (Compl. ¶15).

Functionality and Market Context

  • The complaint alleges that these products collectively form an ecosystem for wireless entertainment. The Accused TVs and Soundbars are described as devices that connect to networks to receive and render digital audio and video content from various services (Compl. ¶¶95, 104). The Accused TV Remotes and Apps are alleged to be portable electronic devices that receive voice commands and other user inputs to wirelessly manage and control the Accused TVs and Soundbars (Compl. ¶131). Plaintiff alleges these products are sold through established U.S. distribution channels and generate substantial revenue (Compl. ¶23).
    No probative visual evidence provided in complaint.

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

The complaint references but does not attach claim chart exhibits detailing its infringement theories (Compl. ¶88). The narrative infringement allegations for the lead patents are summarized below.

’811 Patent Infringement Allegations

The complaint alleges that the Accused TVs directly infringe at least claim 1 of the ’811 Patent (Compl. ¶95). The infringement theory appears to map the functionality of a modern smart TV onto the claim elements. The complaint suggests the Accused TVs function as the claimed "wireless output device" that contains an "output controller" and "output engine" to process and render digital content received over a wireless network. A potential point of contention may arise over whether the streaming data received by the Accused TVs from a content delivery network constitutes "intermediate output data" as contemplated by the patent, which describes this data as the result of a partial raster image process performed by a distinct "information apparatus" (’811 Patent, col. 5:46-6:11).

’259 Patent Infringement Allegations

The complaint alleges that the Accused TVs and Accused Soundbars directly infringe at least claim 1 of the ’259 Patent (Compl. ¶104). The infringement theory focuses on the initial setup process for these devices. The complaint alleges that the accused products are configured to connect to a wireless network by receiving security information (like a Wi-Fi password), establishing a network connection, downloading and installing software components (e.g., apps or firmware updates), and then using those components to receive digital content from a service. A key question for the court may be the degree to which this setup process, as performed by the accused products, aligns with the specific sequence of steps required by the claims, including the role of the device's interface in receiving the initial security information (’259 Patent, col. 23:2-20).

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

’811 Patent

  • The Term: "intermediate output data"
  • Context and Importance: This term is central to the infringement analysis for the ’811 Patent. The infringement allegation appears to depend on construing data streams received by the Accused TVs as meeting this definition. Practitioners may focus on this term because its definition could determine whether the patent, drafted in the context of early mobile-to-peripheral printing, reads on modern cloud-based content streaming.
  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The claim itself defines the term as "corresponding to the digital content" and including "at least image data encoded with at least one compression" (’811 Patent, col. 22:15-18). This language, viewed in isolation, could be argued to cover a wide variety of compressed video or image data streams.
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The specification repeatedly describes "intermediate output data" as the specific output of a partial raster image process where an information apparatus performs rasterization, leaving device-dependent operations like color matching and halftoning for the output device's controller (’811 Patent, Abstract; col. 5:31-38). This may support a narrower construction requiring the data to be the result of this specific, shared processing scheme.

’259 Patent

  • The Term: "receiving, using the interface of the wireless output device, security information"
  • Context and Importance: The infringement case for the ’259 Patent hinges on whether the accused products perform this claimed step during their setup. The construction will clarify what constitutes the "interface" and how it must be used to "receive" the information.
  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The specification provides broad examples of user interfaces, including a "display screen, touch button, soft key, etc." (’259 Patent, col. 21:33-34). This could support a reading where any method of entering a password, including via a remote control keypad displayed on a screen, satisfies the limitation.
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The patent also discloses using a separate device, like a smart phone, to provide the security information to the output device (’259 Patent, Abstract; col. 24:1-12). Embodiments focusing on this phone-as-configurator model could be used to argue for a narrower construction that requires a more specific type of interaction than simply using a standard remote.

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The complaint alleges that LG induced infringement by providing its customers with "extensive customer support and instructions" that allegedly instruct and encourage use of the Accused Products in an infringing manner (Compl. ¶¶100, 109).
  • Willful Infringement: Willfulness allegations are based on both pre-suit and post-suit knowledge. The complaint alleges that LG had pre-suit knowledge of the patents-in-suit via a notice letter sent on October 1, 2021, and that its continued sales after receiving this notice were objectively reckless and willfully blind (Compl. ¶¶79-80, 83). The complaint also asserts that service of the complaint itself establishes knowledge for any ongoing infringement (Compl. ¶79).

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

This case will likely involve significant disputes over whether patent claims drafted during the emergence of pervasive computing can be applied to today's ubiquitous cloud-based streaming and smart device ecosystems. The central questions for the court appear to be:

  • A question of technological evolution and definitional scope: Can the term "intermediate output data," which the ’811 Patent defines in the context of a client device performing partial rasterization, be construed to cover modern compressed video streams delivered from a cloud service to a smart TV? The answer may determine whether a patent aimed at solving the mobile printing problem of the early 2000s applies to the streaming video architecture of the 2020s.
  • A question of process and function: Does the initial setup process for LG's smart devices meet the specific sequence of claim limitations in patents like the ’259 Patent, which require, for example, using the device's interface to receive security information for the purpose of then downloading and installing software to access a content service? The infringement analysis will likely turn on a granular, step-by-step comparison of the accused product workflows against the patented methods.