DCT

5:23-cv-00025

NexGen Control Systems LLC v. NXP Semiconductors NV

Log In

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: NexGen Control Systems, LLC v. NXP Semiconductors N.V., 5:23-cv-00025, E.D. Tex., 03/15/2023
  • Venue Allegations: Venue is alleged to be proper because the NXP defendants are foreign corporations not resident in the United States and are subject to personal jurisdiction in the district.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s semiconductor products, including motor controllers, gate drivers, and DC-DC converters, infringe three patents related to power management and device protection in automotive and industrial applications.
  • Technical Context: The patents address foundational technologies for improving the efficiency and reliability of power electronics, specifically in controlling electric motors, protecting power semiconductors from short circuits, and stabilizing DC-DC converters.
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint notes that the patents-in-suit originated from research and development by Mitsubishi Electric Corporation. It also mentions that Plaintiff is pursuing co-pending patent enforcement actions against an NXP entity in China, related to similar digital signal controller technology.

Case Timeline

Date Event
2002-07-30 U.S. Patent No. 6,906,574 Priority Date
2005-06-14 U.S. Patent No. 6,906,574 Issues
2007-10-29 U.S. Patent No. 8,278,855 Priority Date
2008-09-19 U.S. Patent No. 8,531,150 Priority Date
2012-10-02 U.S. Patent No. 8,278,855 Issues
2013-09-10 U.S. Patent No. 8,531,150 Issues
2023-01-13 Plaintiff files complaint against NXP in China
2023-03-15 Complaint Filed in E.D. Tex.

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 8,278,855, "Controller of Motor Preventing an Increase in Inverter Loss," issued Oct. 2, 2012

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: In power conversion devices for electric vehicles, high-frequency switching in the inverter creates significant heat ("inverter loss"), requiring large and costly cooling systems. This problem is exacerbated when the motor operates in a state where the inverter is already outputting its maximum possible voltage (’855 Patent, col. 1:55-68).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention is a motor controller that actively manages this inverter loss. It features a current-command generating unit that, under conditions where inverter loss is predicted to increase (such as when the inverter is at maximum voltage), adjusts the current command sent to the motor. This adjustment is specifically designed to maintain or decrease the inverter loss, even if it requires a slight reduction in torque, thereby preventing the inverter from overheating ('855 Patent, Abstract; col. 3:20-31).
  • Technical Importance: This control strategy allows for the use of smaller, lighter, and less expensive cooling systems in electric vehicles by intelligently managing the thermal load on the inverter, which is a critical factor in vehicle design and cost ('855 Patent, col. 1:62-68).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts at least independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶73, ¶77).
  • Claim 1 requires:
    • A voltage-command generating unit for generating a pulse-width modulation (PWM) signal to control a switching element in an inverter.
    • A current-command generating unit that outputs a current command to the motor based on a torque command.
    • The current-command generating unit is configured to:
      • Calculate the current command based on a relationship between the torque command and a state quantity of the motor.
      • Maintain a terminal voltage of the motor to a maximum value that can be generated by the direct-current power source.
      • Output a current command adjusted to maintain or decrease the inverter's loss under a predetermined condition where the loss is estimated to increase.
  • The complaint reserves the right to assert additional claims (Compl. ¶73).

U.S. Patent No. 6,906,574, "Drive Circuit For Driving Power Semiconductor Device," issued Jun. 14, 2005

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: High-voltage power semiconductor devices like IGBTs are vulnerable to damage from large currents during a short-circuit event. Prior art methods of detecting short circuits by monitoring the collector voltage were often too slow to protect the device, especially in high-voltage applications (’574 Patent, col. 1:12-34).
  • The Patented Solution: The patent describes a drive circuit that detects a short circuit by monitoring the voltage or current at the device's control terminal (the gate). Under normal turn-on conditions, the gate voltage exhibits a "Miller time period" or plateau. In a short-circuit, this plateau is absent, and the gate voltage rises to its final on-state value much more quickly. The invention uses this abnormally fast rise time to detect the fault and initiate a protective shutdown ('574 Patent, Abstract; col. 5:45-65).
  • Technical Importance: This approach provides a faster and more reliable method for protecting power semiconductors, as the fault condition is detected directly at the gate rather than waiting for its effects to manifest at the collector, enabling safer operation of high-power systems ('574 Patent, col. 2:35-56).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts at least independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶100).
  • Claim 1 requires:
    • Control means for switching the power semiconductor device based on turn-on/turn-off instructions.
    • Abnormality detection means for detecting the value of a voltage or current at the control terminal.
    • The abnormality detection means detects an abnormality when the detected value reaches an on-state value within a time period shorter than a normal time period that would elapse in the absence of an abnormality.
  • The complaint reserves the right to assert additional claims (Compl. ¶100).

U.S. Patent No. 8,531,150, "DCDC Converter," issued Sep. 10, 2013

  • Technology Synopsis: The patent addresses the problem of electrical oscillation in the LC filter circuit of a DC-DC converter, which can cause damaging overvoltage on the input capacitor (Compl. ¶40-41). The invention is a control unit that includes a "damping control unit" that actively suppresses these oscillations by calculating the voltage fluctuation rate of the input capacitor and adjusting the state of the smoothing filter circuit accordingly (Compl. ¶48).
  • Asserted Claims: At least independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶129).
  • Accused Features: The accused features are the control units within NXP's Power Management Integrated Circuits (PMICs) and Safety System Basis Chips (SBCs), which allegedly include a damping control mechanism that calculates a damping operation value based on the input capacitor's voltage (Compl. ¶111, ¶123-124).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

  • Product Identification:
    • NXP ‘855 Products: MC56F83xxx and MC56F84xxx Series Controllers (Compl. ¶51).
    • NXP ‘574 Products: GD3162, GD3160, and GD3100 Series Gate Drivers (Compl. ¶84).
    • NXP ’150 Products: Power Management Integrated Circuits (PMICs) and Safety System Basis Chips (SBCs), including the MC33907, FS45, FS65, and VR5500 series, among others (Compl. ¶111).
  • Functionality and Market Context:
    • The accused products are semiconductor components primarily targeted at automotive and industrial power control applications (Compl. ¶1, ¶54). The ‘855 Products are alleged to be digital signal controllers for advanced motor control (Compl. ¶54). The ‘574 Products are alleged to be gate drivers for IGBT/SiC power devices, offering programmable protection features (Compl. ¶88, ¶27). The ‘150 Products are alleged to be DC-DC converters and controllers that manage power distribution and system stability (Compl. ¶113, ¶120). The complaint alleges these products are part of NXP's vertically integrated business and are sold through a global network of subsidiaries and distributors (Compl. ¶15, ¶17).

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

U.S. Patent No. 8,278,855 Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 1) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
...a voltage-command generating unit that generates a pulse-width modulation signal to control a switching element provided in an inverter... The accused products include Enhanced Flex Pulse Modulator (eFlexPWM) functionality that generates a PWM signal to control a switching element in a connected inverter. A diagram from NXP documentation shows the eFlexPWM unit generating PWM signals that are transmitted to the connected inverter (Compl. ¶57-58). ¶57, ¶58 col. 4:50-55
...the inverter connected to a direct-current power source and outputting a three-phase alternating current...to an alternating-current motor... The PWM signal controls an inverter that is connected to a DC power source (e.g., DC Bus Voltage) and outputs a three-phase alternating current to an AC motor (e.g., a PMSM Motor). A diagram provided in the complaint shows the PWM signal from the controller driving an inverter connected to a DC bus, which in turn powers a 3-phase PMSM motor (Compl. ¶60-61). ¶60, ¶61 col. 4:55-61
...a current-command generating unit that...outputs a current command to cause the alternating-current motor to generate torque based on an input torque command... The accused products contain a current-command generating unit that generates a "quadrature-axis current (isq)" command, which "corresponds to the motor torque," based on an input torque command (Compl. ¶62, ¶64). ¶62, ¶64 col. 3:20-25
...to output a current command adjusted to maintain or decrease a loss of the inverter under a predetermined condition in which the loss of the inverter increases or estimated to increase. During power stage characterization, the accused products measure an inverter error voltage ("Uerror"), which represents inverter loss. This measured error is then allegedly used to adjust the current command to maintain or decrease inverter loss (Compl. ¶69). ¶69, ¶23 col. 18:1-10
  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Scope and Technical Question: A central issue may be whether the "power stage characterization" process and measurement of "Uerror" as described in NXP's documentation (Compl. ¶69, ¶23) is equivalent to the claimed function of outputting "a current command adjusted to maintain or decrease a loss of the inverter under a predetermined condition." The court may need to determine if this characterization process, which is described as a preliminary step, constitutes the real-time, dynamic adjustment implied by the claim language.

U.S. Patent No. 6,906,574 Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 1) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
...abnormality detection means for detecting...a voltage that appears at a control terminal...and...a current that flows into the control terminal... The accused products allegedly comprise an abnormality detection system that monitors voltage and current levels at the power semiconductor device's control terminal (Compl. ¶90). A provided diagram shows monitoring of terminal voltage (Vge) for abnormalities (Compl. ¶91). ¶90, ¶91 col. 6:40-48
...detecting occurrence of an abnormality...when the value detected reaches an on-state value within a time period after receiving a turn-on instruction, the time period being shorter than a normal time period... The complaint alleges the products detect abnormalities when a voltage or current value reaches an on-state value in a shorter time period than normal after a turn-on instruction. A timing diagram from an NXP presentation shows an "On-state comparison window" that begins immediately after a turn-on instruction, allegedly to detect an abnormality if the voltage reaches its on-state threshold within this shortened window (Compl. ¶91). ¶91, ¶92 col. 7:46-52
...in absence of an abnormality in the power semiconductor device. The complaint alleges that in the absence of an abnormality, the detected value reaches the on-state value after a longer, normal time period, distinguishing it from the rapid rise during a fault (Compl. ¶91). ¶91, ¶92 col. 8:1-10
  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Technical Question: A key factual question will be whether NXP's fault detection mechanism, which may be marketed as "desaturation detection" or "overcurrent protection," actually operates by measuring the rate of rise of the gate voltage or current, as specified in the claim. Plaintiff alleges it does, but Defendant may argue its products use a different method, such as simply detecting when a voltage or current exceeds a static threshold, irrespective of the time taken to reach it.

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

For U.S. Patent No. 8,278,855

  • The Term: "a current command adjusted to maintain or decrease a loss of the inverter"
  • Context and Importance: This term is the core of Claim 1's inventive concept. The infringement case hinges on proving that the accused NXP products perform this specific, loss-mitigating adjustment. Practitioners may focus on this term because NXP will likely argue that its products' general power stage characterization or error correction routines are not the specific, dynamic, loss-driven "adjustment" contemplated by the patent.
  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The specification's "Disclosure of Invention" section describes the invention broadly as a current-command generating unit "adjusted not to increase a loss of the inverter under a predetermined condition" ('855 Patent, col. 3:20-25). This general language could support a broader reading.
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The detailed embodiments and figures (e.g., Fig. 6, Fig. 7) illustrate this adjustment in the context of specific operational modes and torque command reductions. Defendant may argue these embodiments limit the term to a specific algorithm where torque is actively sacrificed to manage a precisely calculated inverter loss, not a general pre-characterization of the system.

For U.S. Patent No. 6,906,574

  • The Term: "detecting occurrence of an abnormality... when the value detected reaches an on-state value within a time period... shorter than a normal time period"
  • Context and Importance: This phrase defines the specific method of detection. Infringement depends on showing the accused NXP gate drivers use this timing-based mechanism. Practitioners may focus on this term because the distinction between detecting a fault based on how fast a threshold is reached versus simply if a threshold is reached will be critical.
  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The abstract describes the solution as recognizing an abnormality "when the gate-emitter voltage Vge exceeds a reference value" within a "detection time period," which could be argued to cover various timing-based checks ('574 Patent, Abstract).
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The specification repeatedly contrasts the short-circuited state (Fig. 4, no Miller time period) with the normal operating condition (Fig. 3, with a Miller time period). Defendant may argue this context limits the "shorter... time period" to a specific detection of the absence of the Miller plateau, and that their products' overcurrent detection mechanisms operate differently.

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The complaint alleges both induced and contributory infringement for all three patents. Inducement is primarily based on NXP allegedly providing extensive documentation, including reference manuals, data sheets, application notes, and presentations that instruct and encourage customers and end-users to operate the accused products in a manner that infringes the patents (Compl. ¶77, ¶104, ¶133). Contributory infringement is alleged on the basis that the accused products are a material part of the invention, are especially made or adapted for an infringing use, and are not staple articles of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use (Compl. ¶78, ¶105, ¶134).
  • Willful Infringement: Willfulness is alleged for all three patents. The claims are based on allegations that NXP's infringement is "willful, wanton, malicious, in bad faith, deliberate, consciously wrongful, flagrant, or characteristic of a pirate" (Compl. ¶79, ¶106, ¶135). The complaint asserts NXP had knowledge of the patents at least upon service of the complaint, establishing a basis for post-filing willfulness. Pre-suit knowledge is suggested by the allegation that the patents are "well-known within the industry as demonstrated by multiple citations" in other published patents (Compl. ¶29, ¶38, ¶49).

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

  • A core issue will be one of technical mechanism: Do the accused NXP products' efficiency management and fault protection features operate using the specific methods claimed in the patents—namely, adjusting a current command based on a dynamic assessment of inverter loss ('855 patent) and detecting a short circuit based on an abnormally fast gate signal rise time ('574 patent)—or do they achieve similar outcomes through technically distinct means, such as pre-set characterization or static threshold detection?
  • A second key battleground will be claim construction: The case will likely turn on how the court defines terms such as "current command adjusted to...decrease a loss of the inverter" ('855 patent) and a detection based on a "time period being shorter than a normal time period" ('574 patent). The breadth or narrowness of these definitions will be pivotal in determining whether the functionality described in NXP’s technical documents falls within the scope of the claims.
  • Finally, for the '150 patent, a central question of functional equivalence will arise: Does the accused products' "slope compensation" feature for stabilizing DC-DC converters perform the same function in the same way as the claimed "damping control unit" that calculates a "damping operation amount" based on the "fluctuation rate of the voltage of the input capacitor"?