DCT

5:23-cv-00052

Powermat Tech Ltd v. Anker Innovations Ltd

Log In

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 5:23-cv-00052, E.D. Tex., 06/05/2023
  • Venue Allegations: Plaintiff alleges venue is proper because Defendant is not a resident of the United States and may be sued in any judicial district.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s wireless charging products infringe seven patents related to inductive power transfer, safety, and efficiency monitoring technologies.
  • Technical Context: The lawsuit concerns the technology of inductive wireless charging, a ubiquitous method for powering consumer electronics such as smartphones and wireless earbuds.
  • Key Procedural History: Plaintiff asserts that the patents-in-suit are essential to practicing the widely adopted Qi wireless charging standard, maintained by the Wireless Power Consortium (WPC). Both parties are members of the WPC, which has an intellectual property policy requiring members to license such Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) on reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) terms. The complaint alleges that Plaintiff made numerous attempts to license its SEP portfolio to Defendant beginning in November 2018, but that Defendant was unresponsive, leading Plaintiff to characterize Defendant as an "unwilling licensee."

Case Timeline

Date Event
2006-XX-XX Plaintiff Powermat Technologies Ltd. was founded.
2007-03-22 U.S. Patent No. 8,626,461 Priority Date.
2007-03-23 U.S. Patent Nos. 9,048,696 and 9,083,204 Priority Date.
2007-09-25 U.S. Patent No. 8,049,370 Priority Date.
2007-10-09 U.S. Patent No. 8,283,812 Priority Date.
2008-07-02 U.S. Patent Nos. 8,981,598 and 9,006,937 Priority Date.
2010-07-XX Qi Standard Version 1.0 was issued by the WPC.
2011-11-01 U.S. Patent No. 8,049,370 Issue Date.
2012-10-09 U.S. Patent No. 8,283,812 Issue Date.
2014-01-07 U.S. Patent No. 8,626,461 Issue Date.
2015-03-17 U.S. Patent No. 8,981,598 Issue Date.
2015-04-14 U.S. Patent No. 9,006,937 Issue Date.
2015-06-02 U.S. Patent No. 9,048,696 Issue Date.
2015-07-14 U.S. Patent No. 9,083,204 Issue Date.
2018-11-11 Plaintiff alleges Defendant was first put on notice of its patent portfolio.
2020-08-05 Plaintiff sent a letter to Defendant regarding the need to license its portfolio.
2022-01-03 Anker 313 Wireless Charger (Pad) registered as Qi-compliant with WPC.
2023-01-30 Plaintiff, through counsel, sent a letter to Defendant reiterating licensing needs.
2023-06-05 Complaint Filing Date.

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 8,283,812 - “Inductive Power Providing System Having Moving Outlets”

  • Issued: October 9, 2012.

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: Inductive power systems can waste energy and create unnecessary electromagnetic fields by continuously transmitting power even when no device is present to receive it (Compl. ¶48).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention provides a safety and efficiency mechanism for an inductive power outlet. It describes a protection system that first detects if the primary inductor is transmitting power and then checks if it is actually coupled to a secondary inductor (i.e., a device to be charged). If no secondary inductor is detected, a controller disconnects the primary inductor from its power supply to prevent power transmission (Compl. ¶48; ’812 Patent, col. 20:57-59).
  • Technical Importance: This approach enables the creation of "always-on" wireless charging surfaces that are both energy-efficient and safer, as they only deliver power when a compatible device is correctly placed for charging (Compl. ¶48, ¶52).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts independent claim 9 and dependent claims 10-11 (Compl. ¶49).
  • The essential elements of independent claim 9 include:
    • An inductive power outlet with at least one primary inductor for coupling with a secondary inductor.
    • A protection system to prevent power transmission when no load is present.
    • The protection system includes:
      • At least one primary detector for detecting that the primary inductor is transmitting power.
      • At least one secondary detector for detecting that the primary inductor is inductively coupled to a secondary inductor.
      • A controller configured to disconnect the primary inductor from the power supply if no secondary inductor is detected.

U.S. Patent No. 8,626,461 - “Efficiency Monitor for Inductive Power Transmission”

  • Issued: January 7, 2014.

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: Power transfer in inductive systems is not perfectly efficient; energy can be lost as heat, particularly due to misalignment or the presence of foreign metallic objects between the transmitter and receiver, creating a potential safety hazard (’461 Patent, col. 1:47-53).
  • The Patented Solution: The patent describes an "efficiency monitor" for a wireless power outlet. This system uses an input power monitor to measure the power going into the transmitter's primary coil and a signal detector to receive data about the output power being received by the device's secondary coil. A processor then uses this input and output data to calculate an "index of power-loss," which indicates how efficiently the power transfer is occurring (Compl. ¶67; ’461 Patent, col. 19:10-15). This index can be used to support functions like foreign object detection (Compl. ¶75).
  • Technical Importance: By actively monitoring efficiency, the system can identify unsafe or inefficient charging conditions and react accordingly, which is a foundational technology for safety features like Foreign Object Detection (FOD) in modern wireless chargers (Compl. ¶75).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts independent claim 13 and dependent claim 14 (Compl. ¶68).
  • The essential elements of independent claim 13 include:
    • An inductive power outlet comprising a primary coil.
    • An efficiency monitor, which includes:
      • An input power monitor to measure input power received by the primary coil.
      • A signal detector to detect signals carrying data about output power received by the secondary coil.
      • A processor configured to receive this data and determine an "index of power-loss" indicating the coupling efficiency.

Multi-Patent Capsule Summaries

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,048,696, “Transmission-Guard System and Method for an Inductive Power Supply,” issued June 2, 2015.

  • Technology Synopsis: The patent describes a method for transferring power at a transmission frequency that is "substantially different" from the inductive couple's natural resonant frequency. This non-resonant approach is intended to make the system less sensitive to misalignment between the charging coils (Compl. ¶85).

  • Asserted Claims: 1-7, 9, 10, and 14 (Compl. ¶86).

  • Accused Features: The complaint accuses products like the Anker 737 MagGo, alleging that its use of a MagSafe alignment module and a full-bridge inverter operating at a frequency dictated by the Qi standard (e.g., around 100 kHz), rather than the couple's true resonant frequency, infringes the patent (Compl. ¶91-94).

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 8,981,598, “Energy Efficient Inductive Power Transmission System and Method,” issued March 17, 2015.

  • Technology Synopsis: The patent discloses an inductive power outlet that uses a "trigger sensor" to detect a nearby receiver and then initiates a handshake protocol. The outlet provides power for a limited time and will stop driving the coil if it does not receive an instruction signal back from the receiver within that time (Compl. ¶103).

  • Asserted Claims: 1-3 and 5 (Compl. ¶104).

  • Accused Features: The complaint alleges that products like the Anker 313 Pad, by complying with the Qi standard, perform an infringing process. This includes detecting an object (the trigger), performing a "digital ping" (the activation signal), and waiting for a confirmation signal within a timeout period before proceeding with charging (Compl. ¶109-112).

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,006,937, “System and Method for Enabling Ongoing Inductive Power Transmission,” issued April 14, 2015.

  • Technology Synopsis: The patent describes a system for controlling power transfer based on feedback signals from the power receiver. A key aspect is the use of a "perpetuation signal," which, when received by the power outlet, instructs the driver to maintain the current power level without adjustment (Compl. ¶121).

  • Asserted Claims: 8-12 (Compl. ¶122).

  • Accused Features: The complaint alleges that the Qi-compliant communication in products like the Anker 313 Pad infringes. Specifically, it alleges that when the charger receives a "Control Error Packet" with a value of zero, this functions as the claimed "perpetuation signal," causing the charger to maintain its power level (Compl. ¶128).

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 9,083,204, “Transmission-Guard System and Method for an Inductive Power Supply,” issued July 14, 2015.

  • Technology Synopsis: The invention relates to controlling power transfer by adjusting the transmission frequency in a non-resonant system. Power is increased or decreased by incrementally decreasing or increasing the transmission frequency based on feedback signals from the receiver (Compl. ¶137).

  • Asserted Claims: 1-5 and 8 (Compl. ¶138).

  • Accused Features: The complaint accuses products like the Anker 737 MagGo, alleging that its Qi-compliant power control algorithm adjusts its operating frequency up or down in response to Control Error Packets to modulate power, thereby infringing the patent's claims (Compl. ¶146-147).

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 8,049,370, “Centrally Controlled Inductive Power Transmission Platform,” issued November 1, 2011.

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent describes a power transmission platform with a "cluster" of multiple primary inductors connected to a common driver via individual power switches. A key safety feature is that a power switch is configured to disconnect its associated inductor from the driver only after the driver has been deactivated, ensuring no current passes through the switch as it opens (Compl. ¶156).

  • Asserted Claims: 1, 7, 8, and 11 (Compl. ¶157).

  • Accused Features: The complaint accuses products with multiple coils, such as the Anker 313 Stand with "Twin charging coils." It alleges that the product's method for handling foreign object detection—terminating the power transfer (deactivating the driver) before ceasing to energize a specific coil—infringes the patent (Compl. ¶160-162). A marketing image shows the accused product's internal twin coil structure (Compl. p. 47).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

  • Product Identification: The complaint names a wide range of Anker's wireless charging products, including its 313, 315, 335, 533, 544, 613, 623, 633, 737, and 747 series chargers, stands, pads, and magnetic batteries (MagGo) (Compl. ¶49, ¶68). The analysis focuses on representative products for specific allegations, such as the Anker 313 Wireless Charger (Pad), the Anker 533 Wireless Charger (3-in-1 Stand), and the Anker 737 MagGo Charger.
  • Functionality and Market Context: The accused products are consumer-grade wireless chargers that transfer power inductively to compatible devices like smartphones, watches, and earbuds (Compl. ¶51, ¶89). The complaint alleges that Defendant is a member of the WPC and has declared many of the accused products as compliant with the Qi wireless charging standard (Compl. ¶31). The complaint includes a screenshot from the WPC website showing the registration for the Anker 313 Wireless Charger (Pad) as compliant with the Qi standard and the A11a transmitter design (Compl. p. 9). Plaintiff alleges these products incorporate patented technologies essential for the safety and efficiency features required by the Qi standard, such as foreign object detection and power control (Compl. ¶50, ¶69, ¶75).

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

8,283,812 Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 9) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
An inductive power outlet for transmitting power to an electric load The Anker 313 Pad is a wireless charger, which functions as an inductive power outlet for charging devices. ¶51 col. 20:41-43
comprising at least one primary inductor wired to a power supply... for inductively coupling with a secondary inductor The product includes a primary coil that is wired via a USB cable to a power supply and couples with the secondary coil in a Qi-enabled device. ¶54 col. 20:44-47
a protection system configured to prevent the transmission of power in the absence of the electric load The product's "MultiProtect" safety system and compliance with the Qi Standard, which requires power removal, are alleged to constitute this system. An included marketing image highlights the product's "Ultra-Safe" features (Compl. p. 14). ¶52, ¶53 col. 20:48-50
at least one primary detector for detecting that said primary inductor is transmitting power The product is alleged to detect that its primary inductor is transmitting power, for example by using a current monitor as per the Qi A11a power transmitter design. ¶57 col. 20:51-53
at least one secondary detector for detecting that said primary inductor is inductively coupled to said secondary inductor The product is alleged to detect the presence of a coupled secondary inductor, as required by the Qi A11a design. ¶55, ¶57 col. 20:54-56
a controller configured to disconnect said primary inductor from said power supply if no secondary inductor is detected The product is alleged to disconnect the primary inductor from the power supply if no device is detected, a requirement of the Qi Standard for safety and efficiency. ¶58 col. 20:57-59
  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Structural Questions: The complaint's allegations for the "primary detector" and "secondary detector" rely on functionalities required by the Qi standard (Compl. ¶57). A central question may be whether the Anker products contain two distinct detectors as arguably required by the claim's structure, or if a single component or software routine performs a consolidated function. The defense may argue that a single component performing multiple functions does not meet the "at least one... at least one" limitation for structurally distinct elements.
    • Evidentiary Questions: The infringement theory is heavily tied to the product's alleged compliance with the Qi standard. A key point of contention will likely be what evidence demonstrates that Anker's implementation of the standard's requirements for power monitoring and object detection actually practices the specific steps and structures recited in the patent's claims.

8,626,461 Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 13) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
An inductive power outlet... comprising a primary coil The Anker 533 is a wireless charging stand that functions as an inductive power outlet and contains a primary coil. ¶70 col. 18:61-64
an efficiency monitor The product's advertised safety features, such as "surge protection, temperature control and more," are alleged to constitute the claimed monitor. ¶71 col. 18:65-66
an input power monitor configured to measure input power received by the primary coil The product is alleged to contain an input power monitor, such as a current sensing element, consistent with its compliance with the Qi Standard's MP-A20 Reference Design. ¶72 col. 19:1-4
a signal detector configured to detect signals carrying data pertaining to output power The product is alleged to detect signals from the secondary device, such as Signal Strength Packets and Control Error Packets, as part of the standard Qi communication protocol. ¶73 col. 19:5-9
a processor configured to... determine an index of power-loss indicative of the efficiency of an inductive coupling The product is alleged to comply with the Qi Extended Power Profile (EPP), which requires it to calculate an index of power loss to support foreign object detection. ¶75 col. 19:10-15
  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Scope Questions: What constitutes an "efficiency monitor" as claimed? The complaint maps broad marketing claims of "advanced safety options" to this limitation (Compl. ¶71). The dispute may focus on whether this term requires a specific, dedicated module for calculating efficiency or if it can be read broadly to cover a collection of general safety circuits.
    • Technical Questions: Does the algorithm used by Anker's products for Qi-compliant Foreign Object Detection (FOD) calculate an "index of power-loss" as contemplated by the patent? The analysis will likely involve a technical comparison of how the accused product's FOD works versus the specific methods for determining an efficiency quotient or differential described in the ’461 patent.

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

  • The Term: "primary detector" and "secondary detector" (’812 Patent, Claim 9)

  • Context and Importance: These terms are central to the infringement analysis for the ’812 Patent. The complaint alleges their presence based on functionalities required by the Qi standard. Practitioners may focus on whether these terms require separate physical structures or if their functions can be performed by a single, consolidated component or software algorithm.

  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:

    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The claim language "at least one... and... at least one" could be argued to require only the presence of both enumerated functions, not necessarily two distinct physical components.
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The patent's block diagrams (e.g., FIG. 19, 20a) depict the detectors as separate functional blocks. This could support an interpretation requiring two structurally or functionally distinct elements, potentially creating a higher bar for infringement if the accused products use a single integrated circuit or algorithm for both detection functions.

  • The Term: "index of power-loss" (’461 Patent, Claim 13)

  • Context and Importance: The infringement theory for the ’461 Patent hinges on whether the accused products, in complying with the Qi standard's FOD protocols, "determine an index of power-loss." Practitioners may focus on this term because the case may turn on whether the specific calculation performed by Anker's products for FOD meets the patent's definition of this index.

  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:

    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The specification suggests the index is "indicative of the efficiency" and can be used for FOD (Compl. ¶75). This could support a broad definition covering any calculated value that correlates with power loss and is used for safety monitoring.
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: Dependent claim 14 explicitly defines the index as "an efficiency quotient Q... or an efficiency differential Δ" (Compl. ¶76). This may be used to argue that the independent claim should be construed to be limited to these specific mathematical calculations of efficiency, potentially excluding other metrics that Anker's products might use.

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The complaint alleges inducement of infringement across all asserted patents, stating that Defendant's user guides, manuals, and advertising instruct customers on how to use the accused products in an infringing manner (e.g., Compl. ¶60, ¶78). It also alleges contributory infringement, arguing that the accused products are a material part of the patented inventions and are not staple articles of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use (e.g., Compl. ¶61, ¶79).
  • Willful Infringement: The complaint alleges that Defendant has been on notice of its infringement since at least November 11, 2018, through correspondence that included exemplary claim charts for several of the asserted patents (Compl. ¶38, ¶63, ¶81). The complaint asserts that Defendant's continued infringement despite this knowledge is willful and justifies enhanced damages (e.g., Compl. ¶64, ¶82).

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

  • A core issue will be one of standard-compliance versus infringement: The complaint's infringement theories are deeply rooted in the accused products' alleged compliance with the Qi wireless charging standard. A central question for the court will be whether implementing the functions required by the Qi standard and its associated reference designs necessarily infringes the specific claim limitations of the asserted patents, or if Defendant’s particular implementation constitutes a non-infringing design choice.
  • A second key question will be one of claim construction and technical mapping: The case will likely turn on the construction of functional terms such as "primary detector"/"secondary detector" and "index of power-loss". The outcome will depend on whether the technical operation of the accused products—specifically, how they detect devices and monitor for foreign objects—can be mapped onto the court’s interpretation of what these claim terms require.