DCT

1:23-cv-01506

Universal Connectivity Tech Inc v. Dell Tech Inc

Log In

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 1:23-cv-01506, W.D. Tex., 12/12/2023
  • Venue Allegations: Plaintiff alleges venue is proper in the Western District of Texas because Defendants transact business in the district, have committed acts of infringement there, and maintain regular and established places of business in Round Rock, Texas.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s laptops, desktops, monitors, and docking stations that support various connectivity standards (including DisplayPort, USB 3.0, and USB-C) infringe eight patents related to data transmission, packet handling, and interface protocols.
  • Technical Context: The patents relate to fundamental technologies for high-speed data communication between electronic devices, a critical function in the modern computing market for connecting peripherals like monitors and external drives to computers.
  • Key Procedural History: Plaintiff alleges that prior to the lawsuit, its parent company WiLAN engaged in extensive licensing discussions with Dell, beginning with a letter on April 20, 2022, and continuing through numerous calls until October 2023. The complaint also includes a count for declaratory judgment, indicating a dispute over whether Plaintiff and its predecessors have complied with intellectual property rights (IPR) policies of the VESA and USB-IF standards organizations, which may introduce questions of Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) licensing obligations.

Case Timeline

Date Event
2000-11-22 Priority Date for ’905, ’307, ’798, ’265, ’712, ’520, ’231 Patents
2006-12-26 U.S. Patent No. 7,154,905 Issues
2007-03-06 U.S. Patent No. 7,187,307 Issues
2010-06-29 U.S. Patent No. 7,746,798 Issues
2010-12-21 U.S. Patent No. 7,856,520 Issues
2011-04-05 U.S. Patent No. 7,921,231 Issues
2014-03-25 U.S. Patent No. 8,680,712 Issues
2016-01-05 U.S. Patent No. 9,232,265 Issues
2017-12-26 U.S. Patent No. 9,852,103 Issues
2022-04-20 WiLAN sends Dell letter alleging infringement of asserted patents
2022-05-09 Dell confirms receipt of April 20 letter
2022-05-20 Parties hold call to discuss patents
2022-05-27 Parties hold call to discuss patents
2022-06-23 Parties hold call to discuss patents
2022-08-29 Parties hold call to discuss patents
2022-11-09 Parties hold call to discuss patents
2023-02-15 Parties hold call to discuss patents
2023-04-20 Parties hold call to discuss patents
2023-06-08 WiLAN presents formal license offer to Dell
2023-09-18 Parties hold call to discuss patents
2023-10-05 Parties hold call to discuss patents
2023-12-12 Complaint Filed

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 7,154,905 - "Method and system for nesting of communications packets"

  • Issued: December 26, 2006

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent describes that as communication speeds and distances increase between devices like hosts and storage drives, the communications link can become a performance bottleneck (’905 Patent, col. 2:1-6). Traditional parallel bus-based techniques become costly and complex due to issues like cross-talk and clock skew, while existing serial techniques may have high overhead for certain applications (’905 Patent, col. 2:7-44).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention provides a serial communications architecture that employs several techniques to improve performance, including the "nesting" of packets (’905 Patent, Abstract). This allows a higher-priority packet (e.g., a control packet) to interrupt, or be "nested" within, the transmission of a lower-priority packet (e.g., a large data packet). The system uses special control symbols ("primitives") to signal the preemption and subsequent continuation of the interrupted packet, ensuring that high-priority information is not delayed by large data transfers (’905 Patent, col. 19:20-24; Fig. 13).
  • Technical Importance: This approach allows for more efficient use of a serial communications link by prioritizing control information over bulk data without having to wait for a large data transfer to complete, a technique critical for responsive and reliable communication protocols.

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts independent claim 21 (Compl. ¶11).
  • Essential elements of claim 21 include:
    • a transmission component that transmits a first packet; and
    • a preemption component that signals the transmission component to stop transmitting the first packet,
    • transmits a preempt indicator indicating that a second packet is to be transmitted,
    • transmits the second packet, and
    • signals the transmission component to continue transmitting the first packet;
    • wherein packets include in-band symbols and the indicators include one or more out-of-band symbols.
  • The complaint does not explicitly reserve the right to assert dependent claims for this patent.

U.S. Patent No. 7,187,307 - "Method and system for encapsulation of multiple levels of communication protocol functionality within line codes"

  • Issued: March 6, 2007

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent addresses the conventional separation of functionalities in layered communication protocols (like the OSI model), where each layer is distinct (’307 Patent, col. 1:21-32). This strict separation can lead to inefficiencies, as higher layers lack direct information from the physical transmission layer, and functionality may be duplicated or delayed across layers.
  • The Patented Solution: The invention proposes a method to "encapsulate" or embed functionalities of multiple protocol layers (e.g., link, network, transport) directly into the "line codes" used at the physical transmission layer (’307 Patent, Abstract). Data is organized into "cells" containing both application data and multi-purpose control bits. These control bits can convey information relevant to different layers simultaneously, such as priority level, virtual channel, error correction, and flow control, all within the same transmitted data structure (’307 Patent, col. 5:1-13; Fig. 2).
  • Technical Importance: This technique creates a more tightly integrated and efficient communication system by collapsing distinct protocol layers, allowing for faster processing and reducing overhead compared to traditional layered architectures.

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts independent claim 68 (Compl. ¶22).
  • Essential elements of claim 68 include:
    • A transmitter including physical and link layer circuitry.
    • Packetizing circuitry configured to generate M-bit input words indicative of application data and control bits.
    • Encoding and transmission circuitry to encode the input words into a code word sequence of N-bit code words (where N>M).
    • The code word sequence is indicative of at least one cell of the input words.
    • The cell includes at least two of the control bits, which have multiple levels of communication protocol functionality.
  • The complaint does not explicitly reserve the right to assert dependent claims for this patent.

U.S. Patent No. 7,746,798 - "Method and system for integrating packet type information with synchronization symbols"

  • Issued: June 29, 2010
  • Technology Synopsis: The patent addresses the need for a receiving device to quickly identify the type of an incoming data packet (e.g., data vs. control) to process it efficiently (’798 Patent, Abstract). The invention solves this by encoding the packet type information directly into the synchronization symbols that precede the packet, rather than requiring the receiver to parse the packet header. This allows the lower-level link layer, rather than the higher-level transport layer, to rapidly identify and route packets based on type (’798 Patent, col. 13:51-64).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 19 (Compl. ¶33).
  • Accused Features: Dell products that support USB 3.0 and later (Compl. ¶32).

U.S. Patent No. 9,232,265 - "Method, apparatus and system for transitioning an audio/video device between a source mode and a sink mode"

  • Issued: January 5, 2016
  • Technology Synopsis: The patent addresses the problem of device role confusion when two audio/video (AV) devices are connected, where both might attempt to act as a "source," potentially causing damage (’265 Patent, col. 4:4-11). The invention provides a method for a device to default to a safe "sink" mode upon power-on or connection. The device then uses a sequence of checks on the communication line (e.g., detecting voltage, impedance) to determine if the connected device is a sink, and only then transitions into a "source" mode to transmit AV data (’265 Patent, Abstract; Fig. 4A).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 8 (Compl. ¶44).
  • Accused Features: Dell products that support USB-C Revision 1.0 or later (Compl. ¶43).

U.S. Patent No. 8,680,712 - "Power delivery over digital interaction interface for video and audio (DiiVA)"

  • Issued: March 25, 2014
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent describes a system for delivering power over the same serial cable used for transmitting high-definition video and audio data between devices in a network (’712 Patent, Abstract). The system uses a power delivery circuit in each device that includes a voltage source, a power relay switch, and a load detector. This allows a central device (like a TV) to act as a "POD server" and safely provide power to other connected devices ("POD clients") in a daisy chain, detecting their power needs based on load current (’712 Patent, col. 2:35-49; Fig. 4).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶55).
  • Accused Features: Dell products that support USB-C Version 1.0 or later (Compl. ¶54).

U.S. Patent No. 7,856,520 - "Control bus for connection of electronic devices"

  • Issued: December 21, 2010
  • Technology Synopsis: The patent addresses the proliferation of physical connections on smaller, mobile devices by creating a single, bi-directional control bus to replace multiple control signal lines required by standards like HDMI (’520 Patent, Abstract). The system multiplexes different control signals (e.g., DDC, CEC) into data packets that are transmitted over this single-line bus. The protocol includes mechanisms for arbitration, allowing either connected device to gain control of the bus to send commands (’520 Patent, col. 2:45-50; Fig. 2).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 12 (Compl. ¶66).
  • Accused Features: Dell products that support DisplayPort Alt Mode on USB Type-C Version 1.0 or later, or HDMI Alt Mode for USB-C (Compl. ¶65).

U.S. Patent No. 7,921,231 - "Discovery of electronic devices utilizing a control bus"

  • Issued: April 5, 2011
  • Technology Synopsis: The patent describes a method for devices connected via a control bus to discover each other's capabilities, particularly distinguishing between a standard device and a mobile device with modified protocols (’231 Patent, Abstract). A device enters different states based on signals detected on the control and power lines. For example, a dual-mode receiver can differentiate between a standard transmitter (which provides a +5V signal) and a mobile transmitter (which sends a pulse on the control line), allowing it to adapt its communication protocol accordingly (’231 Patent, Fig. 4).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claims 10 and 16 (Compl. ¶76).
  • Accused Features: Dell products that support DisplayPort Alt Mode on USB Type-C Version 1.0 and later (Compl. ¶75).

U.S. Patent No. 9,852,103 - "Bidirectional transmission of USB data using audio/video data channel"

  • Issued: December 26, 2017
  • Technology Synopsis: The patent discloses a method for transmitting USB data in both directions over a high-speed audio/video link (like MHL or HDMI) that is typically unidirectional (’103 Patent, Abstract). It uses a Time Division Multiplexing (TDM) scheme where time slots are allocated for "forward" data (source to sink) and "backward" data (sink to source) on the same physical channel. Synchronization signals are used to manage the turnover between transmission directions, enabling half-duplex, bidirectional USB communication over a link designed for one-way AV streaming (’103 Patent, Fig. 2).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claim 21 (Compl. ¶86).
  • Accused Features: Dell products that support USB 4 Version 1.0 or later (Compl. ¶85).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

Product Identification

  • The complaint accuses Dell products including laptops, desktops, monitors, docking stations, and adapters (Compl. ¶10, ¶21). Specific examples cited include the Alienware AW3423DW Monitor, Alienware Aurora R14 Desktop, Inspiron 7425 Laptop, and G15 Gaming Laptop (Compl. ¶10, ¶32, ¶65).

Functionality and Market Context

  • The accused functionality centers on the implementation of industry-standard high-speed data interfaces in Dell's products. The complaint alleges that products supporting specific versions of these standards necessarily practice the patented inventions. These standards include DisplayPort (Version 1.0 and later), USB (3.0 and later, including USB 4), and USB-C (including DisplayPort Alternate Mode and HDMI Alternate Mode) (Compl. ¶10, ¶21, ¶32, ¶43, ¶54, ¶65, ¶75, ¶85). These connectivity standards are fundamental to the operation of modern computers and peripherals, enabling high-resolution display output, fast data transfer, and device charging.

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

No probative visual evidence provided in complaint.

For each of the asserted patents, the complaint alleges that the accused products satisfy all claim limitations and states that a claim chart comparing an exemplary independent claim to representative products is attached as an exhibit (Compl. ¶11, ¶22, ¶33, ¶44, ¶55, ¶66, ¶76, ¶86). These exhibits were not included in the provided complaint document. The narrative infringement theory for each lead patent is summarized below.

  • ’905 Patent Infringement Allegations: The complaint alleges that Dell products supporting DisplayPort 1.2 or later directly infringe one or more claims of the ’905 Patent, including at least claim 21 (Compl. ¶10-11). The underlying theory suggests that the DisplayPort standard's protocol for managing data transmission over a serial link implements the claimed method of "nesting" packets by using indicators to preempt a data transmission with a higher-priority one.
  • ’307 Patent Infringement Allegations: The complaint alleges that Dell products supporting DisplayPort Version 1.0 or later infringe one or more claims of the ’307 Patent, including at least claim 68 (Compl. ¶21-22). The infringement theory appears to be that the DisplayPort standard's line code and data structure "encapsulate" information corresponding to multiple communication protocol layers (e.g., physical, link, and higher) into a single transmitted cell, as required by the claims.

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

’905 Patent, Claim 21

  • The Term: "preempt indicator"
  • Context and Importance: The entire claim hinges on the concept of interrupting a packet with another. The definition of the "preempt indicator" is central to determining whether the accused DisplayPort protocol performs this specific claimed step. Practitioners may focus on whether a standard control symbol or command in the DisplayPort protocol meets the functional and structural requirements of the claimed "indicator."
  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The specification describes the indicator functionally, stating it is used to "exchange control information" and can be an "out-of-band" symbol, which may suggest that any control symbol that causes a preemption could qualify (’905 Patent, col. 11:58-12:12).
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: Figure 13 and the accompanying text show a specific sequence: data packet -> "Preempt" primitive -> control packet -> "continue" primitive (’905 Patent, Fig. 13). This could support a narrower construction requiring a specific, dedicated symbol whose sole purpose is to signal preemption, rather than a general-purpose control command.

’307 Patent, Claim 68

  • The Term: "multiple levels of communication protocol functionality"
  • Context and Importance: Infringement depends on whether the control bits in the accused DisplayPort line code serve functions that can be attributed to "multiple levels" of a communication protocol stack (e.g., link layer, network layer, etc.). The dispute will likely center on how these "levels" are defined and whether the functions performed by the accused protocol bits (e.g., flow control, addressing) map to more than one such level as understood in the patent.
  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The patent background references the seven-layer OSI model as an example of a protocol stack (’307 Patent, col. 1:24-32). This could support an interpretation where any control bits performing functions analogous to those in different OSI layers (e.g., link-layer framing and transport-layer flow control) would satisfy this limitation.
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The detailed description notes that the control bits can be used by "application layer circuitry, presentation layer circuitry, session layer circuitry, transport layer circuitry, network layer circuitry, link layer circuitry, and/or physical layer circuitry" (’307 Patent, col. 6:45-51). A defendant might argue that to meet the "multiple levels" limitation, the accused control bits must be shown to be used by distinct circuitry corresponding to those different layers, not just perform functions abstractly associated with them.

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The complaint alleges Dell induces infringement by encouraging and instructing customers to use the accused products in an infringing manner. This is allegedly done through Dell's advertisements that its products are compatible with standards like DisplayPort and USB, as well as through user manuals and online instructions that guide users on how to use these interfaces (Compl. ¶13, ¶24, ¶35, ¶46, ¶57, ¶67, ¶77, ¶87).
  • Willful Infringement: The complaint alleges willful infringement based on Dell's alleged pre-suit knowledge of the patents. It cites a letter sent by Plaintiff's parent company to Dell on April 20, 2022, which identified the patents and the accused products. This was followed by numerous calls and communications between the parties over the next 18 months, which allegedly included substantive discussions of infringement (Compl. ¶12, ¶17, ¶23, ¶28).

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

  • A core issue will be one of claim scope and standards mapping: Do the asserted claims, which describe specific architectural solutions like "nesting" packets and "encapsulating" protocol levels, read on the operations of Dell's products that comply with industry standards like DisplayPort and USB-C? The case will likely require a deep technical comparison between the patent specifications and the mandatory operations defined by the relevant standards.
  • A second key question will involve standards-essentiality and licensing obligations: Plaintiff's request for a declaratory judgment regarding its compliance with VESA and USB-IF IPR policies raises the issue of whether the patents are essential to practicing those standards. If so, the dispute may shift from infringement to the terms of a potential license, focusing on whether Plaintiff's offers were consistent with any Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) obligations.
  • A third question will be evidentiary proof of operation: Because infringement is alleged based on compliance with complex technical standards, a central battleground will be demonstrating how the accused Dell devices actually implement those standards in practice. The analysis will depend not just on the text of the standards, but on evidence showing the specific hardware and software behavior of the accused products.