DCT

1:24-cv-01199

HBCU Messaging US LP v. Apple Inc

Log In

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 1:24-cv-01199, W.D. Tex., 01/24/2025
  • Venue Allegations: Plaintiff alleges venue is proper in the Western District of Texas based on Apple maintaining multiple regular and established places of business in the district, including its second-largest U.S. campus, and Green Dot Corporation maintaining its principal place of business in Austin, Texas.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Apple’s Messages application and Apple Cash service, the latter of which involves Defendant Green Dot, infringe seven patents related to methods for automatically selecting between different mobile messaging bearers (e.g., packet-switched data vs. SMS) and for securely communicating with third-party providers.
  • Technical Context: The patents address foundational technologies for modern messaging applications, which seamlessly integrate proprietary data-based messaging (like iMessage) with legacy cellular messaging (like SMS), and enable in-app functionalities like peer-to-peer payments.
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint alleges that Apple has been aware of the asserted patent family since at least June 2015 due to a long-running patent litigation in Germany involving a European counterpart patent. The complaint also alleges direct contact between Apple and the patents’ prior owner in 2016 to discuss the technology and potential infringement, and that Plaintiff sent notice letters detailing the infringement allegations in September 2024.

Case Timeline

Date Event
2007-07-24 Earliest Priority Date for Asserted Patents
2014-12-23 ’127 Patent Issued
2015-06-29 German Infringement Litigation Initiated Against Apple
2016-10-03 Prior Patent Owner (Rembrandt) Contacted by Apple
2021-05-18 ’827 Patent Issued
2021-08-10 ’450 Patent Issued
2023-05-16 ’182 Patent Issued
2023-05-16 ’183 Patent Issued
2024-05-21 ’600 Patent Issued
2024-05-21 ’601 Patent Issued
2024-09-13 Plaintiff Sent Notice Letters to Defendants
2025-01-24 Complaint Filed

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 8,918,127 - “Messaging Service in a Wireless Communication Network” (issued Dec. 23, 2014)

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent’s background section describes the technical divide between Short Messaging Service (SMS), which is ubiquitous but limited in functionality, and Mobile Instant Messaging (MIM), which is more feature-rich but requires separate user handles and persistent internet connections ('127 Patent, col. 1:29-67). The problem is the lack of a unified system that can intelligently and automatically select the best transmission method using a standard phone number as the user identifier ('127 Patent, col. 2:1-4).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention discloses a method where a sending device determines a recipient’s capabilities before sending a message. It does this by sending a request to a server to verify if the recipient's destination address is subscribed to a packet-switched messaging service ('127 Patent, Abstract). If the recipient is a subscriber, the device sends the message via a feature-rich packet-switched bearer; if not, it defaults to sending a standard SMS, creating a seamless user experience that automatically leverages the best available technology ('127 Patent, col. 2:44-51).
  • Technical Importance: This technology provided a method to unify disparate messaging protocols under a single interface, forming a basis for modern messaging applications that automatically switch between proprietary data messages and standard SMS/MMS (Compl. ¶32-33).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶115).
  • Essential Elements of Claim 1:
    • Receiving information associated with a destination address of a recipient's wireless device.
    • Determining a transmission mode by sending a request to a server via a packet-switched WLAN base station to see if the recipient is a subscriber to the service.
    • Receiving a response from the server via the WLAN base station.
    • The request and response do not traverse the cellular core network.
    • Selecting a first transmission mode (packet-switched) if the response indicates the recipient is a subscriber.
    • Selecting a second transmission mode (SMS) if the response indicates the recipient is not a subscriber.
    • Sending the message using the selected transmission mode.

U.S. Patent No. 11,012,827 - “Random Number Derived Message Transmission to a Third Party Provider” (issued May 18, 2021)

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent addresses the need for users to interact with third-party services (e.g., for content or financial transactions) from within a messaging application without exposing their private phone number to that third party (’827 Patent, col. 11:25-36).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention describes a system where a user's message intended for a third-party provider is first sent to an intermediary server associated with the messaging service. This server then forwards a new message containing the content to the third party. Crucially, this forwarded message is "derived at least in part from a random number," which masks the user's actual phone number and protects their privacy while still enabling the transaction or communication (’827 Patent, Abstract; col. 11:30-33).
  • Technical Importance: This method provides a framework for secure and privacy-preserving in-app interactions with external services, a concept foundational to features like peer-to-peer payments within a messaging client (Compl. ¶129).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts independent claims 1 and 9 (Compl. ¶128).
  • Essential Elements of Claim 1:
    • A mobile wireless device that transmits messages to subscribers of a service and over a cellular network to non-subscribers.
    • The device comprises a WLAN transceiver and a cellular transceiver.
    • The device transmits message content intended for a third-party provider to a server associated with the service.
    • The server forwards a message containing that content to the third-party provider.
    • The message forwarded to the third party is "derived at least in part from a random number."

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 11,089,450

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 11,089,450, “Messaging Service in a Wireless Communications Network,” issued August 10, 2021.
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent relates to methods for subscribing to and using a packet-switched messaging service. It describes a process where a device can automatically discover and enroll in the service, transmit requests to determine a recipient's subscription status, and format messages differently depending on whether they are sent via the enhanced service or a conventional one (Compl. ¶48-51).
  • Asserted Claims: Claims 1 and 6 (Compl. ¶142).
  • Accused Features: Apple's Messages App is accused of infringing by enabling automatic enrollment in iMessage and formatting messages (e.g., blue vs. green bubbles) based on the recipient's status (Compl. ¶51, ¶89).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 11,653,182

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 11,653,182, “Server That Sends a Response When a Mobile Phone Has an Active Status With a Packet Switched Message Service,” issued May 16, 2023.
  • Technology Synopsis: The patent describes a system that conserves network resources by first verifying a recipient's subscription status before attempting to send an enhanced packet-switched message. It further claims the functionality of automatically defaulting to a conventional service (like SMS) if the enhanced service is unavailable, without requiring a separate messaging client (Compl. ¶55-57).
  • Asserted Claims: Claims 17 and 21 (Compl. ¶155).
  • Accused Features: Apple's Messages App is accused of infringing by checking a recipient's iMessage status before sending and defaulting to SMS if the recipient is not registered or unavailable (Compl. ¶57, ¶89).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 11,653,183

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 11,653,183, “Undelivered Message Threshold,” issued May 16, 2023.
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent addresses message delivery failure. It claims a method for automatically re-sending a message using an alternative bearer (e.g., SMS) after a primary packet-switched message fails to be delivered. It also covers determining the recipient's status even when the recipient device is not actively connected to a message server (Compl. ¶64-66, ¶70).
  • Asserted Claims: Claims 20 and 30 (Compl. ¶168).
  • Accused Features: The failover mechanism in Apple's Messages App, which may attempt to send a message as an SMS if an iMessage fails, is accused of infringement (Compl. ¶65, ¶89).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 11,991,600

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 11,991,600, “Methods for Bearer Selection Performed By a Sending Mobile Device,” issued May 21, 2024.
  • Technology Synopsis: The patent describes methods for selecting among three different transmission modes: SMS, packet-switched over cellular, and packet-switched over WLAN. The invention allows a single client to automatically select the appropriate format and transmission mode for a single recipient device, regardless of that device's current connectivity (Compl. ¶74-75). It also covers systems for automatically detecting and updating a subscriber's device capabilities (Compl. ¶79).
  • Asserted Claims: Claims 1, 10, 13, 14, and 15 (Compl. ¶181).
  • Accused Features: Apple's Messages App is accused of infringing by using a single client to send messages over cellular data, Wi-Fi, and SMS bearers (Compl. ¶74, ¶89).

Multi-Patent Capsule: U.S. Patent No. 11,991,601

  • Patent Identification: U.S. Patent No. 11,991,601, “Wireless Messaging Method and Server,” issued May 21, 2024.
  • Technology Synopsis: This patent focuses on an on-the-fly subscription process triggered by the user composing a message. It also claims a method for controlling message traffic by using information about a recipient's devices to bar messages from being sent to a second device that cannot receive them, thereby improving efficiency (Compl. ¶86-87).
  • Asserted Claims: Claims 25 and 26 (Compl. ¶194).
  • Accused Features: The iMessage activation process and message routing logic across a user's multiple Apple devices are accused of infringement (Compl. ¶86-87, ¶89).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

Product Identification

  • The accused instrumentalities include Apple's Messages App, the Apple Cash service, Apple devices that run this software (e.g., iPhone, iPad, MacBook), and the supporting server infrastructure for iMessage and Apple Cash (Compl. ¶89).

Functionality and Market Context

  • The complaint alleges that Apple's Messages App automatically determines whether a recipient is an iMessage user. If the recipient is a user, the app sends a message using a packet-switched data bearer (over Wi-Fi or cellular data), which appears in a "blue bubble." If the recipient is not an iMessage user, the app automatically sends the message using a conventional SMS/MMS bearer, which appears in a "green bubble" (Compl. ¶33). The complaint further alleges that the Apple Cash service operates within the Messages App and uses Green Dot Corporation as a third-party payment platform to facilitate money transfers between users (Compl. ¶19, ¶129). The "blue bubble/green bubble" distinction is described as a "famous and valuable" feature of Apple's ecosystem (Compl. ¶33). No probative visual evidence provided in complaint.

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

’127 Patent Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 1) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
receiving ... information associated with a destination address of a wireless device of a recipient The Messages App receives a phone number entered by the user as the destination address for a new message. ¶37 col. 2:13-15
determining a transmission mode for sending an outgoing message ... by sending a request via a packet switched wireless local area network (WLAN) base station to a server, and receiving a response from the server When a user composes a message, Apple's device sends a request over a data network (e.g., Wi-Fi) to Apple's servers to determine if the recipient's phone number is registered for iMessage. The device then receives a response indicating the recipient's status. ¶38 col. 2:16-24
wherein the request sent to the server and the response received from the server do not traverse the cellular core network The complaint alleges this request and response occurs over a data network like Wi-Fi and does not traverse the legacy cellular core network associated with SMS. ¶40 col. 2:25-28
selecting...a first transmission mode...when the response provides an indication of whether the destination address corresponds to a subscriber of the service If Apple's servers indicate the recipient is registered for iMessage, the device selects the packet-switched data bearer (iMessage) for transmission. ¶38 col. 2:29-35
selecting...a second transmission mode...when the response provides an indication of whether the destination address does not correspond to a subscriber of the service If Apple's servers indicate the recipient is not registered for iMessage, the device selects the conventional SMS/MMS bearer for transmission. ¶38 col. 2:36-43

’827 Patent Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 1) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
A mobile wireless device that transmits ... message content intended for a third party provider, to a server associated with the service A user on an Apple Device initiates an Apple Cash payment within the Messages App. The message content (payment details) is transmitted to Apple's servers. ¶129 col. 11:15-18
which forwards a message comprising the message content intended for the third party provider, to the third party provider The complaint alleges Apple's servers forward the payment message to Green Dot, which functions as the third-party provider for Apple Cash. ¶129 col. 11:18-20
wherein the message forwarded to the third party provider is derived at least in part from a random number The complaint alleges that the message Apple forwards to Green Dot to process the payment is derived in part from a random number, presumably to create a secure transaction token or identifier. ¶129 col. 11:20-22
  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Scope Questions: For the ’127 Patent, a central question may be the construction of "does not traverse the cellular core network." The defense may argue that modern cellular data networks are part of the "cellular core network," while the plaintiff may argue the term, in the context of the patent, refers specifically to the legacy SS7 signaling network used for SMS, which data-based lookups would avoid.
    • Technical Questions: For the ’827 Patent, a key factual dispute will likely concern whether the transaction messages between Apple's servers and Green Dot's platform are, in fact, "derived at least in part from a random number." The analysis may depend on whether a transaction token or session ID generated using a random seed meets this limitation, which will require technical discovery into the Apple Cash protocol.

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

  • Term 1 (’127 Patent, Claim 1): "subscriber of a service"

    • Context and Importance: The determination of infringement hinges on whether an iMessage user is a "subscriber of a service" as contemplated by the patent. Practitioners may focus on this term because the defense could argue that iMessage is a built-in feature, not a "service" to which users formally "subscribe," potentially distinguishing it from the patented method.
    • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
      • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The specification does not appear to require a formal or paid subscription. It describes a system where users can be added to a "subscriber address list" simply by being identified as capable of receiving packet-switched messages, which could support the view that any iMessage-enabled user qualifies ('127 Patent, col. 4:63-65).
      • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The detailed description repeatedly refers to a "messaging service" associated with a "message server," which could imply a more formalized service architecture than a default device feature ('127 Patent, col. 3:38-41).

  • Term 2 (’827 Patent, Claim 1): "derived at least in part from a random number"

    • Context and Importance: This term is critical for determining infringement by the Apple Cash feature. The dispute will likely center on the degree of randomness and derivation required. Practitioners may focus on this term because the defense could argue that its transaction identifiers are pseudo-random or deterministically generated in a way that falls outside a proper construction of the claim.
    • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
      • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The claim language "at least in part" suggests that the use of a random number as a seed in a larger algorithm for generating a token could be sufficient to meet the limitation.
      • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The specification provides an example where the server "dynamically create[s] a random number that maps to the user's actual mobile number," suggesting a more direct role for the random number in masking the user's identity ('827 Patent, col. 11:30-33). This could support an argument that a simple transaction ID that is not directly mapped from a random number does not infringe.

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The complaint alleges that Apple and Green Dot induce infringement by advertising and distributing the Accused Instrumentalities and providing instructions and documentation that encourage and enable users to perform the patented methods (Compl. ¶120-121, ¶134-135). Contributory infringement is alleged on the basis that the Accused Instrumentalities are especially made or adapted for infringing the patents and are not staple articles of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use (Compl. ¶123, ¶137).
  • Willful Infringement: Willfulness is alleged for all asserted patents. The complaint bases this allegation on Defendants' alleged knowledge of the patent family since at least June 2015, stemming from a German litigation against Apple involving a related patent (e.g., Compl. ¶116). The claim is further supported by alleged discussions between Apple and the prior patent owner in 2016 and notice letters sent by Plaintiff in September 2024 (Compl. ¶116-118).

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

  • A core issue will be one of claim scope and temporal context: Can the claims, which were drafted based on a 2007 priority date to solve problems in that era’s technology (e.g., distinguishing packet-data from the SS7 signaling network), be construed to read on Apple’s modern, highly integrated messaging architecture? The construction of terms like "cellular core network" will be dispositive.
  • A second central question will be one of evidentiary proof of operation: Can Plaintiff, through technical discovery, demonstrate that the internal protocols of the Accused Instrumentalities meet specific claim limitations? This is particularly salient for the allegation that Apple Cash transactions with Green Dot utilize a message "derived at least in part from a random number."
  • Finally, a key issue for damages will be willfulness: Given the extensive pre-suit history alleged in the complaint, including foreign litigation and direct communications dating back to 2015, the case will likely involve a significant dispute over whether Apple’s alleged infringement was objectively reckless, which could expose it to the risk of enhanced damages.