DCT

1:24-cv-01200

Big Will Enterprises Inc v. Kia America Inc

Log In

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 1:24-cv-01200, W.D. Tex., 10/08/2024
  • Venue Allegations: Plaintiff alleges venue is proper in the Western District of Texas because Defendant operates numerous automobile dealerships and conducts substantial business within the district.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s Kia Driving Score system infringes five U.S. patents related to using sensor data from wireless devices to determine and analyze the motion activity of a person or vehicle.
  • Technical Context: The technology at issue falls within the domain of vehicle telematics and motion analysis, where sensors like accelerometers and gyroscopes are used to monitor behaviors such as acceleration, braking, and cornering for applications including usage-based insurance and driver feedback systems.
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint does not allege any prior litigation, licensing history, or post-grant proceedings involving the asserted patents.

Case Timeline

Date Event
2008-01-16 Priority Date for ’914, ’951, and ’846 Patents
2012-08-30 Priority Date for ’273 and ’558 Patents
2013-05-28 U.S. Patent No. 8,452,273 Issued
2013-10-15 U.S. Patent No. 8,559,914 Issued
2014-05-27 U.S. Patent No. 8,737,951 Issued
2015-06-02 U.S. Patent No. 9,049,558 Issued
2019-12-31 U.S. Patent No. 10,521,846 Issued
2024-10-08 Complaint Filed

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 10,521,846 - “Targeted advertisement selection for a wireless communication device (WCD)”

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent addresses the challenge of accurately identifying a "mobile thing motion activity" (MTMA) using sensor data from a wireless device, which can then be used to trigger further electronic messaging or other actions (Compl. ¶3; ’846 Patent, col. 1:25-33). A key underlying problem is identifying movement accurately when the sensor has no fixed orientation relative to the person or object being monitored (Compl. ¶3).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention proposes a method and system where a wireless communication device (WCD) uses its sensors (e.g., accelerometer) to determine a specific MTMA, such as walking, running, or driving. This is achieved by processing sensor data, comparing it to stored reference "signatures" for various activities, and selecting the most likely match. Based on the determined MTMA, the system then selects and communicates a targeted advertisement to the user's device (’846 Patent, Abstract; col. 23:26-59).
  • Technical Importance: This approach of using on-device sensors to infer a user's real-world context (i.e., their motion activity) enables context-aware applications without requiring fixed sensor placement, a key development for devices like smartphones carried in pockets or bags (Compl. ¶3).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • Independent Claim 1 (Method) and Independent Claim 12 (Device) are asserted (Compl. ¶¶18, 29).
  • The essential elements of independent method claim 1 include:
    • Determining a mobile thing motion activity (MTMA) associated with a mobile thing (MT) transporting a wireless communication device (WCD), based on sensor data from the WCD.
    • The sensor data measures physical movement in a 3D coordinate system to permit statistical analysis.
    • Selecting an advertisement based at least in part upon the determined MTMA.
    • Causing the advertisement to be communicated to the WCD.
    • The determination step involves storing reference MTMA signatures, normalizing sensor data, analyzing it in frequency and time domains, and selecting a most likely MTMA signature.
  • The complaint reserves the right to assert additional claims, including dependent claims (Compl. ¶¶17, 29).

U.S. Patent No. 9,049,558 - “Systems and methods for determining mobile thing motion activity (MTMA) using sensor data of wireless communication device (WCD) and initiating activity-based actions”

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent’s related application data points to the background of its parent patent, which notes that prior art methods for motion detection had low accuracy or required sensors to be in a fixed position (e.g., a hip pocket), limiting their practical use ('273 Patent, col. 2:2-25). The core problem is accurately determining motion activity regardless of the device's orientation relative to the user ('273 Patent, col. 2:54-61).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention provides a method to overcome the orientation problem by first using sensor data to establish a stable frame of reference. It receives multiple streams of data from a sensor like an accelerometer and recognizes a "particular set of data sample values as a reference for defining an orientation of the WCD in a coordinate system," often by identifying the constant force of Earth's gravity ('558 Patent, Abstract; col. 21:28-40). Subsequent data is then normalized relative to this reference frame, allowing for accurate calculation of movement and identification of the MTMA (’558 Patent, Abstract).
  • Technical Importance: This method of establishing an orientation-agnostic coordinate system was a crucial step for enabling reliable motion tracking on mobile devices that are carried in various, unpredictable ways (Compl. ¶3).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • Independent Claims 1, 17, 27, 36, 42, and 52 are asserted (Compl. ¶¶36, 47, 55, 63, 69, 78).
  • The essential elements of independent method claim 1 include:
    • Receiving a time value and at least three streams of data sample values from sensors of a WCD transported by a mobile thing.
    • Recognizing a particular set of data sample values as a reference for defining an orientation of the WCD in a coordinate system.
    • Computing reference data based on the recognized set.
    • Calculating movement data for other non-reference data sample values based upon the reference data.
    • Determining a mobile thing motion activity (MTMA) based upon the movement data.
  • The complaint reserves the right to assert additional claims (Compl. ¶35).

U.S. Patent No. 8,737,951 - “Interactive personal surveillance and security (IPSS) systems and methods”

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent describes a wireless communication device programmed with instructions for a personal surveillance and security system. The system enters different modes of operation based on sensor data to determine if a user needs assistance, such as after an accident or crime, and can capture further data to confirm the activity (Compl. ¶¶89-90).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claims 1 and 10 are asserted (Compl. ¶¶89, 94).
  • Accused Features: The complaint alleges the Kia Driving Score system infringes by using logic to monitor movements and enter different surveillance modes (e.g., driving, idling, accident surveillance) and to identify aggressive driving behavior that may indicate a need for assistance (Compl. ¶89).

U.S. Patent No. 8,559,914 - “Interactive personal surveillance and security (IPSS) systems and methods”

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent relates to a system with logic for determining a user activity and/or surroundings, determining a corresponding surveillance mode, and facilitating a user-defined response. It also includes logic for communicating surveillance information to a remote device (Compl. ¶¶97, 100).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claims 5 and 15 are asserted (Compl. ¶¶97, 100).
  • Accused Features: The complaint alleges the Kia Driving Score system uses logic to monitor driving behaviors (the user activity), operates in a surveillance mode to evaluate driver actions, and provides feedback to the user and remote servers (the user-defined response and communication) (Compl. ¶¶97, 100).

U.S. Patent No. 8,452,273 - “Systems and methods for determining mobile thing motion activity (MTMA) using accelerometer of wireless communication device”

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent describes a method for determining motion activity by using accelerometer data to define a reference coordinate system. It receives 3D acceleration data, recognizes a reference set to define a relationship between the 3D system and a 2D coordinate system, computes reference data, and calculates subsequent movement data within that 2D system to determine the motion activity (Compl. ¶104).
  • Asserted Claims: Independent claims 1, 12, and 22 are asserted (Compl. ¶¶104, 115, 123).
  • Accused Features: The complaint alleges the Kia Driving Score system uses accelerometer data to create reference data (e.g., by identifying and removing gravity) that establishes a coordinate system for accurately measuring vehicle movements like harsh braking and acceleration (Compl. ¶¶104, 115).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

Product Identification

  • The accused instrumentality is the "Kia Driving Score system" (Compl. ¶14).

Functionality and Market Context

  • The Kia Driving Score system is a feature included in certain Kia automobile models that uses in-vehicle sensors, such as accelerometers and gyroscopes, to monitor driver behavior (Compl. ¶15). The system is alleged to analyze sensor data to identify and evaluate "fast accelerations, hard braking and aggressive cornering (steering)" (Compl. ¶15). This analysis results in a numerical "driving score," which is provided to the driver via a connected application to "improve your driving proficiency" (Compl. p. 7). A screenshot in the complaint shows a user interface displaying a "DRIVING SCORE" of 85, along with metrics for "Average Trip Speed" and "Hard Braking Events" (Compl. p. 7). The complaint alleges that this system is also used in connection with usage-based insurance programs, where driving data may be shared with service providers (Compl. pp. 7, 9). Another visual from the complaint breaks down "Key Scoring Factors," explicitly listing "Hard Braking" defined as an "abrupt reduction of speed due to brake application" (Compl. p. 9).

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

'846 Patent Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 1) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
A method for use in connection with a wireless communication device (WCD) transported by a mobile thing (MT)... comprising: determining a mobile thing motion activity (MTMA) associated with the MT that is transporting the WCD based at least in part upon sensor data, the sensor data derived from one or more sensors associated with the WCD The Kia Driving Score system uses WCDs in a vehicle (MT) to monitor accelerometer and other sensor data to determine driver behaviors such as harsh acceleration, braking, and turning. ¶18 col. 89:59-65
the one or more sensors measuring physical movement of the WCD in three dimensional... space... in order to permit statistical analysis of the physical movement The system analyzes x, y, and z-axis accelerations from an accelerometer and/or gyroscope to capture the movements of vehicles for statistical analysis. ¶18 col. 90:1-5
selecting an advertisement based at least in part upon the determined MTMA The Kia system allegedly "leverages this data for driver-centric advertisements, which can be beneficial for Kia insurance." ¶18 col. 90:6-7
causing the advertisement to be communicated to the WCD The system communicates these driver-centric advertisements to the user. Dependent claim allegations suggest this occurs via in-app messages, text messages, or emails. ¶18, ¶19 col. 90:8-9
wherein the determining the MTMA comprises: storing a plurality of reference MTMA signatures in the memory... analyzing the normalized data sets in the frequency and time domains; ... and selecting a most likely MTMA signature The system allegedly compares live accelerometer/gyroscope data to reference motion activity to create signatures. The complaint states this analysis occurs in the frequency and time domains to determine the motion activity based on predetermined thresholds. ¶18, ¶13 col. 90:10-24
  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Scope Questions: A primary dispute may arise over the term "advertisement." Does the alleged provision of "driver-centric advertisements" for "Kia insurance" or "reward messages" (Compl. ¶¶18-19) meet the claim's requirement of "selecting an advertisement"? The defense may argue that driver safety feedback, rewards, or insurance scoring do not constitute "advertisements" as contemplated by the patent.
    • Technical Questions: What evidence does the complaint provide that the accused system performs the specific multi-step MTMA determination process of Claim 1, including storing and comparing "signatures," normalizing data, analyzing in both frequency and time domains, and selecting a "most likely" signature based on likelihoods? The allegations appear to track the claim language without detailing how the accused Kia system technically performs each of these specific sub-steps.

'558 Patent Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 1) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
A method, comprising: receiving a time value and at least three streams of data sample values from one or more sensors of a wireless communication device (WCD) that is transported by a mobile thing (MT) The Kia Driving Score system uses accelerometers to detect 3D accelerations on the x, y, and z axes from a WCD in a vehicle. ¶36 col. 34:39-44
recognizing a particular set of data sample values as a reference for defining an orientation of the WCD in a coordinate system The system collects accelerometer data that includes gravity. This gravity data is allegedly processed to determine a direction and "auto-calibrates determining vertical, and horizontal positions," thereby establishing an orientation. ¶36 col. 34:48-52
computing reference data based upon the recognition of the particular set, the reference data defining a relationship between each set of subsequent non-reference data sample values and the particular reference set of data sample values in the coordinate system The system allegedly determines reference data based on whether gravitational accelerations are included. This reference data is then used for subsequent measurements. ¶36 col. 34:53-59
calculating movement data in the coordinate system of one or more other non-reference data sample values based upon the reference data The system calculates "real-time movement accelerations across the x, y, and z axes of accelerometer data" based on the previously computed reference data. ¶36 col. 34:60-63
determining a mobile thing motion activity (MTMA) associated with the MT based upon the movement data The system identifies MTMA such as "unsafe braking and sharp cornering" for driver feedback based on the calculated movement data. ¶36 col. 35:1-3
  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Technical Questions: The central technical question will be whether the Kia Driving Score system actually performs the specific three-step normalization process claimed: (1) "recognizing" a specific set of values as a reference for orientation, (2) "computing" reference data from that set, and then (3) "calculating" movement data based on that reference data. The complaint alleges the system monitors Earth's gravity to establish orientation (Compl. ¶37), which aligns with the patent's disclosure. The dispute will likely focus on whether Kia's proprietary algorithm functions in this specific manner or uses a different technical approach to analyze sensor data that is not dependent on establishing such a static reference frame.
    • Scope Questions: What does it mean to "recognize" a set of data as a "reference"? Practitioners may focus on whether this requires identifying a specific, discrete event (like a period of stillness to measure gravity) as the patent's specification suggests, or if it can cover a more continuous or dynamic calibration process.

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

  • Term ('846 Patent): "advertisement"

    • Context and Importance: The infringement allegation for the ’846 Patent hinges on whether the output of the Kia Driving Score system—which the complaint describes as "driver-centric advertisements, which can be beneficial for Kia insurance" and "reward messages"—qualifies as an "advertisement" under the claim language (Compl. ¶¶18-19). This term's construction may be outcome-determinative for this patent.
    • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
      • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The patent does not explicitly define "advertisement," potentially leaving it open to its plain and ordinary meaning, which could encompass any form of notice or promotion, including for services like insurance or rewards programs.
      • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: Claim 6 of the ’846 Patent recites "enabling an advertiser to communicate the advertisement to the WCD," which may suggest the advertisement originates from a distinct commercial entity, not from the system provider itself as part of a feedback or scoring service (’846 Patent, col. 90:40-44).

  • Term ('558 Patent): "recognizing a particular set of data sample values as a reference for defining an orientation"

    • Context and Importance: This phrase describes the foundational step of the patented method for achieving orientation-agnostic motion analysis. The infringement analysis will turn on whether Kia's system performs this specific act. Practitioners may focus on this term because it appears to require a distinct recognition event that establishes a baseline orientation, rather than a continuous data processing stream that does not rely on such a reference.
    • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
      • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The claim language itself is general and does not specify how the recognition must occur, potentially covering any process that uses some data to establish an orientation baseline for analyzing other data.
      • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The specification of the parent '273 patent, incorporated by reference, repeatedly describes this step in the context of finding "effectively stationary, points" where the only detected force is gravity, and using that vector as the reference ('273 Patent, col. 8:4-11). This suggests the "recognizing" step is tied to a specific physical state (stationarity) to isolate the gravity vector, potentially narrowing the claim's scope to exclude systems that determine orientation through other means.

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The complaint does not provide sufficient detail for analysis of indirect infringement. While the prayer for relief mentions contributory and inducing infringement, the factual allegations in the body of the complaint focus exclusively on direct infringement by Defendant Kia (Compl. p. 63).
  • Willful Infringement: The complaint asserts willful infringement in its prayer for relief, seeking enhanced damages for all five patents-in-suit (Compl. p. 63). However, the complaint does not allege a factual basis for pre-suit or post-suit knowledge of the patents, such as prior communication or awareness of the patents.

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

  • A core issue will be one of technical operation: Does the proprietary algorithm in Kia's Driving Score system perform the specific, multi-step process of establishing a reference coordinate system from sensor data (e.g., by identifying the Earth's gravity vector) and then normalizing subsequent data against it, as required by claims in the ’558 and ’273 patents, or does it utilize a fundamentally different method for motion analysis?
  • A second key question will be one of definitional scope: Can the term "advertisement" as used in the ’846 patent be construed broadly enough to encompass the driving scores, safety feedback, reward messages, and usage-based insurance information allegedly generated and communicated by the Kia system?
  • Finally, a central procedural question will be one of pleading sufficiency: Given the number of patents and asserted independent claims, the court may need to determine whether the complaint's allegations provide sufficient factual detail about the inner workings of the accused system to render the infringement claims for each asserted patent plausible, particularly for the detailed data-processing steps recited in the claims.