DCT

2:23-cv-00743

Trove Brands LLC v. Jia Wei Lifestyle Inc

Log In

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 2:23-cv-00743, D. Utah, 10/18/2023
  • Venue Allegations: Venue is alleged to be proper because the defendant is an alien corporation and because it has allegedly sold infringing products within the judicial district, constituting a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s shaker bottles infringe a design patent and a utility patent directed to the design and functionality of a bottle lid with an integrated handle and flip top.
  • Technical Context: The dispute is in the consumer goods sector, specifically concerning portable beverage containers, such as shaker bottles, which are widely used for mixing and consuming nutritional supplements.
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint alleges that Plaintiff provided Defendant with notice of the asserted patents prior to filing the lawsuit. A notice letter regarding the '830 Patent was allegedly sent to retailer Walmart on March 15, 2022, and subsequently forwarded to Defendant. A follow-up letter regarding the D551 Patent was sent directly to Defendant on January 20, 2023.

Case Timeline

Date Event
2012-09-07 D696,551 Patent Priority Date
2012-09-11 8,695,830 Patent Priority Date
2013-12-31 U.S. Design Patent No. D696,551 Issues
2014-04-15 U.S. Patent No. 8,695,830 Issues
2022-03-15 Plaintiff sent infringement notice letter to Walmart regarding the '830 Patent
2023-01-20 Plaintiff sent infringement notice letter to Defendant regarding the D551 Patent
2023-10-18 Complaint Filing Date

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Design Patent No. D696,551, "Bottle Lid Having Integrated Handle," issued December 31, 2013

The Invention Explained

As a design patent, the invention is the specific, non-functional ornamental design for a bottle lid as depicted in its figures (D'551 Patent, Figs. 1-6). The claimed design consists of the visual characteristics embodied in the lid, including the particular shape and contours of the flip-top cap, the configuration of the integrated carrying handle loop, the appearance of the spout area, and the overall aesthetic arrangement and impression of these elements combined (D'551 Patent, Figs. 1-6).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The patent contains a single claim for "the ornamental design for a bottle lid with an integrated handle, as shown and described."

U.S. Patent No. 8,695,830, "Container Lid Having Independently Pivoting Flip Top and Handle," issued April 15, 2014

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent's background section identifies a design challenge in container lids that have integrated handles: there is a "trade-off between positioning the handle in a convenient and efficient location, and minimizing the risk that the flip top will be opened unintentionally due to forces on the handle" ('830 Patent, col. 1:12-19).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention claims to solve this problem with a container lid where the carrying handle and the flip top are both mounted on a common pivot axis but are "independently pivotable" ('830 Patent, Abstract; col. 2:26-34). This mechanical separation allows a user to carry the container by the handle without transferring opening or closing forces to the flip top, thus preventing accidental spills ('830 Patent, col. 3:39-44). Figure 1 provides an exploded view illustrating how the handle (102) and flip top (101) are separate components that assemble onto the mount (104).
  • Technical Importance: The design aimed to enhance the functionality and reliability of portable beverage containers by enabling the coexistence of a convenient carrying handle and a secure sealing mechanism ('830 Patent, col. 1:12-19).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts independent claim 1 and dependent claims 12 and 20 (Compl. ¶41).
  • The essential elements of independent claim 1 include:
    • A lid base with an opening and a mount with first and second posts.
    • A handle with first and second ends, each having a handle pivot.
    • A flip top with an elongated body and a flip top pivot.
    • The flip top pivot is disposed between and engages the two ends of the handle.
    • The handle pivots connect to the posts on the mount.
    • The ends of the handle are "sandwiched between" the flip top pivot and the posts of the mount.
    • Protrusions on the flip top pivot extend into openings in the handle.
    • The handle and the flip top are "each independently pivotable" about a common axis.
  • The complaint reserves the right to assert additional claims (Compl. ¶41).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

Product Identification

The accused product is identified as the "Jia Wei Shaker Bottle" (Compl. ¶28).

Functionality and Market Context

The complaint describes the accused product as a shaker bottle with a lid that incorporates a flip-top cap for sealing a drinking spout and an integrated handle for carrying (Compl. ¶¶ 27-28). The complaint alleges that the Defendant's product is sold to "identical customers and through overlapping channels of trade and marketing," such as major retailers including Walmart (Compl. ¶¶ 29, 34). A photograph of the accused product shows a shaker bottle with a lid that includes a prominent flip-top cap and a looped carrying handle (Compl. ¶28, p. 10).

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

D696,551 Patent Infringement Allegations

The complaint alleges that the design of the Jia Wei Shaker Bottle Lid is "substantially the same as the claimed design" of the D'551 Patent (Compl. ¶39). The legal standard for design patent infringement is whether, in the eye of an ordinary observer, the resemblance between the patented design and the accused design is such as to deceive the observer into purchasing one supposing it to be the other (Compl. ¶39). To support this allegation, the complaint provides a visual comparison chart. A table in the complaint presents side-by-side views of the D'551 patent figures and photographs of the accused lid from multiple angles, including side, top, and perspective views (Compl. p. 13).

  • Identified Points of Contention: The central question for the court will be whether an ordinary observer, giving the attention a purchaser usually gives, would find the overall ornamental appearance of the Jia Wei lid to be substantially the same as the patented design. This analysis will focus on the overall visual impression created by the designs, not on a simple comparison of discrete features.

8,695,830 Patent Infringement Allegations

The complaint alleges that the Jia Wei Shaker Bottle infringes at least claims 1, 12, and 20 of the '830 Patent (Compl. ¶41). The complaint references claim charts attached as Exhibit 6 to support these allegations; however, this exhibit was not included with the complaint as filed, so no detailed element-by-element analysis can be conducted based on the provided documents (Compl. ¶41). The narrative theory is that the accused bottle lid contains the structural and functional elements of the claims, including a handle and flip top that are independently pivotable on a common axis and assembled in the claimed configuration.

  • Identified Points of Contention:
    • Scope Questions: A likely point of dispute is the proper construction of "independently pivotable." The question will be whether the accused product's mechanism, upon inspection, allows the handle and flip top to pivot with the degree of independence required by the claim, or if their movement is linked in a way that falls outside the claim scope.
    • Technical Questions: A key factual question will be whether the accused lid is constructed with the handle "sandwiched between" the flip top pivot and the mount posts, as recited in claim 1. Verification of this specific structural arrangement will be critical to the infringement analysis.

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

For the '830 Patent:

"independently pivotable"

Context and Importance: This term is the core of the claimed invention, distinguishing it from prior art where handle movement could unintentionally open the flip top. The outcome of the infringement analysis may hinge on the scope given to this term.

Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:

  • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The specification describes the function in broad terms, stating that the handle "can be freely pivoted around the axis of mount 104" and the flip top "can be pivoted around the axis of mount 104 without pivoting handle 102," suggesting a focus on functional decoupling ('830 Patent, col. 3:32-35).
  • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: A defendant may argue that the term is limited by the specific embodiment shown, where the flip top pivot is described as being pressed into the handle to "secure" it, which could suggest a degree of interaction that narrows the meaning of "independently" ('830 Patent, col. 3:62-65).

"sandwiched between"

Context and Importance: This term defines a specific, layered structural relationship between three components: the mount post, the handle, and the flip top pivot. Infringement will require the accused product to embody this precise spatial arrangement. Practitioners may focus on this term because it is a clear structural limitation that can be verified through physical inspection.

Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:

  • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: A party might argue for a functional definition, suggesting it means any arrangement where the handle is held between the other two parts along the pivot axis.
  • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The claim language ("the first end of the handle is sandwiched between a first end of the flip top pivot and the first post of the mount") and Figure 1 strongly suggest a specific assembly sequence and physical layering that may be construed narrowly ('830 Patent, col. 4:50-53; Fig. 1).

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The First Claim for Relief (Patent Infringement) in the complaint pleads facts supporting direct infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271 (Compl. ¶¶ 37-41). The complaint does not set forth specific factual allegations to support the elements of a standalone claim for either induced or contributory infringement.
  • Willful Infringement: The complaint alleges that infringement was willful and deliberate (Compl. ¶¶ 36, 39, 41). The basis for this allegation is the claim that Defendant had pre-suit knowledge of the patents, stemming from a notice letter sent to Walmart on March 15, 2022, and a subsequent letter sent directly to Defendant on January 20, 2023 (Compl. ¶¶ 29, 31, 42).

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

This case presents distinct questions for its design and utility patent claims. The key issues for the court will likely be:

  • A central issue for the D'551 patent will be one of visual comparison: does the overall ornamental design of the accused Jia Wei lid create the same visual impression as the patented design in the eyes of an ordinary observer, especially when viewed in the context of other shaker lid designs in the market?
  • For the '830 patent, a primary question will be one of structural configuration: does the accused product's lid mechanism replicate the specific architecture recited in claim 1, particularly the "sandwiched" relationship between the mount, handle, and flip top pivot?
  • A related key evidentiary question for the '830 patent will be one of functional operation: assuming the structural elements are present, does the accused mechanism allow the handle and flip top to be "independently pivotable" as that term is construed, or is there a degree of mechanical interaction that places the device outside the scope of the claims?