DCT

1:22-cv-01197

Advanced Transactions LLC v. Marco's Pizza Holdings LLC

Log In

I. Executive Summary and Procedural Information

  • Parties & Counsel:
  • Case Identification: 1:22-cv-01197, E.D. Va., 10/21/2022
  • Venue Allegations: Plaintiff alleges venue is proper because Defendant has committed acts of infringement and maintains regular and established places of business in the district, including at least 20 physical store locations in Virginia.
  • Core Dispute: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s digital marketing and e-commerce platforms—including its website, mobile applications, and loyalty programs—infringe eight patents related to email marketing campaigns, mobile processing of economic credits, and global e-commerce systems.
  • Technical Context: The patents address foundational technologies for digital customer engagement in the retail and quick-service restaurant sectors, covering how businesses create and track email campaigns and manage loyalty programs on mobile devices.
  • Key Procedural History: The complaint does not allege any significant pre-suit litigation, licensing history, or administrative patent challenges concerning the patents-in-suit.

Case Timeline

Date Event
2000-02-22 Earliest Priority Date for U.S. Patent No. 8,150,736
2000-04-25 Earliest Priority Date for U.S. Patent Nos. 7,065,555; 7,386,594; and 7,693,950
2000-10-06 Earliest Priority Date for U.S. Patent Nos. 7,979,057; 8,175,519; 9,747,608; and 10,783,529
2006-06-20 U.S. Patent No. 7,065,555 Issued
2008-06-10 U.S. Patent No. 7,386,594 Issued
2010-04-06 U.S. Patent No. 7,693,950 Issued
2011-07-12 U.S. Patent No. 7,979,057 Issued
2012-04-03 U.S. Patent No. 8,150,736 Issued
2012-05-08 U.S. Patent No. 8,175,519 Issued
2017-08-29 U.S. Patent No. 9,747,608 Issued
2020-09-22 U.S. Patent No. 10,783,529 Issued
2022-10-21 Complaint Filed

II. Technology and Patent(s)-in-Suit Analysis

U.S. Patent No. 7,065,555 - "System and Method Related to Generating and Tracking an Email Campaign" (Issued: June 20, 2006)

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The patent addresses difficulties in managing email marketing campaigns, including targeting relevant individuals, tailoring messages for large audiences, and effectively measuring campaign success and tracking recipient feedback (Compl. ¶24; ’555 Patent, col. 1:15-43).
  • The Patented Solution: The invention provides a structured method for creating and tracking email campaigns by generating an "email campaign template" from a database of recipients. This template is described as comprising two distinct parts: a "message template" (the body of the email) and a "configuration file" containing data specific to each recipient (e.g., name, custom URL) that is inserted into the message template to create a customized email for each target (Compl. ¶¶91-92; ’555 Patent, col. 2:1-14).
  • Technical Importance: The claimed method provides a systematic, automatable framework for personalizing mass emails and tracking user engagement, moving beyond simple mail-merge functionalities (Compl. ¶25).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts at least independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶87).
  • Claim 1 is a method claim requiring the essential elements of:
    • Receiving an email target database.
    • Generating an email campaign template related to at least one email target in the database.
    • Sending to each target a corresponding custom email formed from the campaign template.
    • Tracking the custom email sent to each target.
  • The complaint does not explicitly reserve the right to assert dependent claims for this patent.

U.S. Patent No. 7,386,594 - "System and method related to generating an email campaign" (Issued: June 10, 2008)

The Invention Explained

  • Problem Addressed: The complaint states that the specification of the ’594 patent is the same as the ’555 patent and solves the same problems (Compl. ¶32). These problems include the logistical challenges of creating, personalizing, and tracking large-scale email marketing campaigns (Compl. ¶24).
  • The Patented Solution: Like the ’555 patent, this invention describes a method for generating personalized email campaigns. It similarly involves receiving a database of targets and generating an "email campaign template" that is used to form a custom email for each recipient. The custom emails are then sent and their performance is tracked (Compl. ¶¶100-104; ’594 Patent, Abstract).
  • Technical Importance: This patent continues the technical approach of the ’555 patent, providing a structured method for managing personalized, data-driven digital marketing communications (Compl. ¶32).

Key Claims at a Glance

  • The complaint asserts at least independent claim 1 (Compl. ¶98).
  • Claim 1 is a method claim requiring the essential elements of:
    • Receiving an email target database.
    • Generating an email campaign template related to at least one email target, where this generation step comprises generating a message template and a configuration file with data insertable into the message template.
    • Sending to each target a corresponding custom email formed from the campaign template.
  • The complaint does not explicitly reserve the right to assert dependent claims for this patent.

U.S. Patent No. 7,693,950 - "System and Method Related to Generating and Tracking an Email Campaign" (Issued: April 6, 2010)

  • Technology Synopsis: The patent, which shares a specification with the ’555 and ’594 patents, claims a system for conducting an email campaign (Compl. ¶38). The system includes means for receiving information from a target database, generating a message template, generating a configuration file, and sending custom emails formed from the template (Compl. ¶¶110-113).
  • Asserted Claims: At least independent claim 13 is asserted (Compl. ¶108).
  • Accused Features: The accused features are components of the Marco’s Pizza Marketing System, such as its email servers, that allegedly provide the means for receiving user data and generating and sending templated, custom marketing emails (Compl. ¶109).

U.S. Patent No. 7,979,057 - "Third-Party Provider Method and System" (Issued: July 12, 2011)

  • Technology Synopsis: The patent addresses problems with traditional couponing by claiming a method for processing "negotiable economic credits" (e.g., coupons, loyalty points) on a wireless handheld device (Compl. ¶¶47-48). The method involves storing a user-configurable filter on the device, receiving credits from a wireless network based on that filter, storing them in memory, and then retrieving and transferring them via the network (Compl. ¶¶119-123).
  • Asserted Claims: At least independent claim 1 is asserted (Compl. ¶117).
  • Accused Features: The accused features are the Marco’s Pizza mobile apps, which are used to process loyalty rewards and gift cards on smartphones (Compl. ¶118).

U.S. Patent No. 8,150,736 - "Global Electronic Commerce System" (Issued: April 3, 2012)

  • Technology Synopsis: The patent addresses challenges of global e-commerce, such as adapting to different languages and cultures (Compl. ¶¶59-61). It claims a method where a server receives a web page request that includes a "locale identifier value" (referencing a geographic location and language) and, in response, retrieves and generates a version of marketing information specific to that locale (Compl. ¶¶128-130).
  • Asserted Claims: At least independent claim 1 is asserted (Compl. ¶127).
  • Accused Features: The accused features are the Marco’s Pizza webservers, which allegedly receive requests from users (e.g., via a store locator) and generate web pages with information representative of a specific location (Compl. ¶¶128-131).

U.S. Patent No. 8,175,519 - "Third-Party Provider Method and System" (Issued: May 8, 2012)

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent, sharing a specification with the ’057 patent, claims a method for processing negotiable economic credits on a handheld device (Compl. ¶73). The method includes requesting, receiving, storing, retrieving, and sending the credit, and then receiving a message indicating the credit was utilized (Compl. ¶¶136-141).
  • Asserted Claims: At least independent claim 22 is asserted (Compl. ¶135).
  • Accused Features: The accused features are the Marco’s Pizza mobile apps used on smartphones to manage loyalty rewards and gift cards (Compl. ¶136).

U.S. Patent No. 9,747,608 - "Third-Party Provider Method and System" (Issued: August 29, 2017)

  • Technology Synopsis: Sharing a specification with the ’057 patent, this patent claims a method where a portable electronic device transmits a request to a computer system for a data structure corresponding to an account (Compl. ¶79). The device then receives the data structure, which encodes a negotiable economic credit and authentication information, and transmits this information to a point-of-sale (POS) device to apply the credit to a transaction (Compl. ¶¶146-150).
  • Asserted Claims: At least independent claim 10 is asserted (Compl. ¶145).
  • Accused Features: The accused features include smartphones running the Marco’s Pizza app, which interact with Marco’s Pizza servers and in-store POS systems to redeem loyalty rewards and gift cards (Compl. ¶146).

U.S. Patent No. 10,783,529 - "Third-Party Provider Method and System" (Issued: September 22, 2020)

  • Technology Synopsis: This patent, also in the ’057 patent family, claims a method of storing a data structure on a portable device that encodes a negotiable economic credit and authentication information (Compl. ¶85). The device detects a transaction, transmits the credit and authentication information to a POS device to apply a discount, and then receives a message indicating the credit was authenticated and applied (Compl. ¶¶155-158).
  • Asserted Claims: At least independent claim 8 is asserted (Compl. ¶154).
  • Accused Features: The accused features are smartphones with the Marco’s Pizza app that store and redeem loyalty rewards and gift cards at Marco's Pizza POS systems (Compl. ¶155).

III. The Accused Instrumentality

Product Identification

  • The complaint collectively identifies the accused instrumentalities as the "Marco’s Pizza Marketing Products and Services" and the underlying "Marco’s Pizza Marketing System" (Compl. ¶¶8-9). This includes Marco’s Pizza Marketing Emails, the Loyalty Rewards program, Mobile Apps for iOS and Android, Gift Cards, the corporate website (marcos.com), and the associated online and in-store ordering systems (Compl. ¶8).

Functionality and Market Context

  • The accused system provides a digital platform for customer interaction and marketing. The complaint alleges that users provide personal information, including email addresses, through a sign-up form on the website to create an account and join the loyalty program (Compl., p. 29). The system then allegedly sends automated, templated emails, such as a welcome email that asks the user to verify their email address via a unique link (Compl., p. 27). This screenshot shows an email that is personalized with the recipient's name ("John") and contains a link for verification, which the complaint alleges is used for tracking. The mobile applications provide functionality for online ordering, locating stores, and managing and redeeming loyalty points and gift cards (Compl., p. 69-70). The complaint alleges these systems are central to the operations of a brand with over 1,100 stores that recently surpassed $1 billion in annual sales (Compl. ¶¶6, 13).

IV. Analysis of Infringement Allegations

U.S. Patent No. 7,065,555 Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 1) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
a method for conducting an email campaign, comprising the steps of: receiving an email target database; The system receives customer email addresses and other data when users sign up for loyalty rewards or create an account, forming a database of email targets. ¶89 col. 4:65-67
generating an email campaign template related to at least one email target in the received email target database; The system generates marketing emails, such as the loyalty rewards welcome email, from a standardized template. ¶90 col. 2:1-4
sending to each of the at least one email target a corresponding custom email, wherein the custom email is formed from the email campaign template; The system sends personalized emails to users, such as the one addressed to "John," which are formed by populating the template with user-specific data. ¶93 col. 2:51-56
and tracking the custom email sent to each of the at least one email target. The system tracks user engagement through unique verification links embedded in the emails. The complaint provides HTML code allegedly showing this tracking link. ¶94 col. 2:57-61

U.S. Patent No. 7,386,594 Infringement Allegations

Claim Element (from Independent Claim 1) Alleged Infringing Functionality Complaint Citation Patent Citation
a method for conducting an email campaign, comprising the steps of: receiving an email target database; The system receives a database of email targets when customers provide their email addresses and other personal data via the online sign-up form. ¶100 col. 4:65-67
generating an email campaign template related to at least one email target in the received email target database, wherein the step of generating an email campaign template . . . comprises the steps of generating a message template The system allegedly uses a base message template for its marketing emails, such as the welcome email shown in the complaint. ¶102 col. 2:5-7
and generating a configuration file to contain data related to each of the at least one email target, wherein the data is insertable in the generated message template; The complaint alleges the system generates a configuration file containing user-specific data (e.g., name, verification link) that is inserted into the message template to create a customized email. ¶103 col. 2:7-11
and sending to each of the at least one email target a corresponding custom email, wherein the custom email is formed from the email campaign template. The system sends the customized welcome and marketing emails to individual users in the database. ¶104 col. 2:51-56

Identified Points of Contention

  • Scope Questions: A primary question for the ’555 and ’594 patents will be whether the alleged components of Marco’s Pizza’s email system meet the specific structural limitations of the claims. For example, does the system generate a distinct "configuration file" that is separate from the "message template," as required by claim 1 of the ’594 patent, or are these functions integrated in a way that falls outside the claim's scope? The complaint’s screenshot of a sign-up form (Compl., p. 29) supports the allegation of creating a target database.
  • Technical Questions: The infringement allegation for "tracking" in the ’555 patent relies on the presence of a unique link in the email (Compl. ¶94). A key technical question will be what evidence demonstrates that this link is used for the specific purpose of "tracking the custom email" as contemplated by the patent, rather than for a simple, one-time account verification.

V. Key Claim Terms for Construction

  • The Term: "email campaign template" (appearing in asserted claims of the ’555 and ’594 patents)
  • Context and Importance: The infringement theory for the email patents hinges on the allegation that the accused system generates this specific claimed structure. The definition of this term—particularly whether it requires distinct, separable "message template" and "configuration file" components as explicitly recited in claim 1 of the ’594 patent—will be central to determining infringement. Practitioners may focus on this term because modern email systems might generate personalized emails through integrated processes that do not map cleanly onto the patent's more delineated two-part structure.
  • Intrinsic Evidence for Interpretation:
    • Evidence for a Broader Interpretation: The specification describes the invention in general terms as "an efficient way to create and track a email campaign" (’555 Patent, col. 1:44-45). This language may support an argument that the term should be construed broadly to cover any system that automates the generation of personalized, trackable emails, regardless of the specific underlying software architecture.
    • Evidence for a Narrower Interpretation: The detailed description explicitly states that the "email campaign template... comprises a text message file... and a configuration file" (’555 Patent, col. 4:2-4). Figure 3A also depicts the "Text Message" and ".cfg File" as two separate inputs into the Email Campaign Engine. This could support a narrower construction requiring two distinct and identifiable software components.

VI. Other Allegations

  • Indirect Infringement: The complaint does not contain separate counts for indirect or contributory infringement. It alleges that "Marco’s Pizza (or those acting on its behalf)" directly infringes the patents-in-suit (e.g., Compl. ¶87, ¶98). The complaint does not provide sufficient detail for analysis of knowledge or intent related to indirect infringement.
  • Willful Infringement: The complaint does not contain an explicit allegation of willful infringement.

VII. Analyst’s Conclusion: Key Questions for the Case

  • A core issue will be one of structural equivalence: for the email-related patents (’555, ’594, ’950), does the architecture of the accused Marco's Pizza Marketing System, which generates personalized marketing emails, contain the distinct "message template" and "configuration file" components as specifically required by the asserted claims, or does it operate in a more integrated manner that falls outside the claims' literal scope?
  • A key evidentiary question will concern functional mapping: for the mobile transaction patents (’057, ’519, ’608, ’529), does the process of earning and redeeming loyalty points or gift cards through the Marco's Pizza app technically perform the claimed steps of requesting, receiving, storing, and transferring a "negotiable economic credit" to a POS system, as those steps are detailed in the patents?
  • A third question will be one of applicability: for the ’736 patent, which is directed to a "Global Electronic Commerce System" designed to overcome international barriers of language and culture, can its claims be construed to read on a primarily domestic online food ordering system whose main "locale-specific" functionality is a store locator?