PTAB

IPR2016-00567

Exacq Technologies Inc v. JDS Technologies Inc

Log In
Key Events
Petition
petition Intelligence

1. Case Identification

2. Patent Overview

  • Title: Digital Video System Using Networked Cameras
  • Brief Description: The ’964 patent discloses a digital video system where a computer connects to and controls access to multiple video servers and cameras over a network. The system validates access by comparing a unique identifier received from a camera or server against a list of authorized identifiers stored on the computer.

3. Grounds for Unpatentability

Ground 1: Anticipation of Claims 1 and 3 - Claims 1 and 3 are anticipated by Acosta under 35 U.S.C. §102.

  • Prior Art Relied Upon: Acosta (Patent 6,166,729).
  • Core Argument for this Ground:
    • Prior Art Mapping: Petitioner argued that Acosta discloses every limitation of claims 1 and 3. Acosta teaches a central office video management system (COVMS) that controls access to remote camera elements over a network. The COVMS authenticates a camera by receiving a unique serial ID from the camera element and comparing it to a master database of authorized serial IDs. If the camera is authenticated, the COVMS establishes a connection to receive image data for display. This process allegedly maps directly to claim 1’s steps of sending a request, receiving a unique identifier, determining authorization via comparison, and obtaining images in response. For dependent claim 3, Petitioner asserted that Acosta’s camera element, which includes a camera, video digitizer, and processor card, constitutes a "component based video server including inputs for one or more analog video feeds" as claimed.

Ground 2: Obviousness of Claims 2 and 3 - Claims 2 and 3 are obvious over Acosta in view of Axis 200.

  • Prior Art Relied Upon: Acosta (Patent 6,166,729) and Axis 200 (AXIS 200 User’s Manual, Oct. 1998).
  • Core Argument for this Ground:
    • Prior Art Mapping: Petitioner contended that to the extent Acosta's "serial ID" is not explicitly a MAC address as required by claim 2, Axis 200 supplies this teaching. Axis 200 is a user manual for a commercially available network camera that explicitly states its serial number is identical to its Ethernet (MAC) address. Combining Acosta's access control method with the specific identifier taught by Axis 200 renders claim 2 obvious. For claim 3, Petitioner argued that while Acosta teaches a component-based video server, Axis 200 alternatively teaches a "camera server that includes a camera and a web server with an Ethernet port," satisfying the other option recited in the claim.
    • Motivation to Combine: A person of ordinary skill in the art (POSITA) would combine Acosta's management system with a known network camera like the Axis 200. The references are from the same field of networked camera systems and are complementary, with Acosta providing a management system and Axis 200 providing a compatible end-device. A POSITA would be motivated to ensure the management system could support commercially available cameras, making the combination a predictable design choice to increase interoperability.
    • Expectation of Success: A POSITA would have had a high expectation of success because both systems used standard TCP/IP protocols, making integration straightforward. The combination amounted to the simple substitution of one known type of network camera and its identifier (MAC address) into a system designed to manage such devices.

Ground 3: Obviousness of Claim 4 - Claim 4 is obvious over Acosta in view of Axis 200 and Nelson.

  • Prior Art Relied Upon: Acosta (Patent 6,166,729), Axis 200 (user manual), and Nelson (Patent 6,292,838).
  • Core Argument for this Ground:
    • Prior Art Mapping: Petitioner argued that claim 4 recites a method of controlling access to a hardware device by validating its MAC address. The combination of Acosta and Axis 200 teaches all steps of this method except for explicitly "transmitting a request...for a MAC address." In Acosta, the COVMS passively listens for a broadcast from the camera containing its identifier. Nelson was introduced to supply the teaching of actively requesting a MAC address. Nelson discloses a method for determining the MAC address of a remote device by sending a request to the network segment where the device is located.
    • Motivation to Combine: A POSITA, seeking to make the Acosta/Axis 200 system more robust, would have found it obvious to incorporate Nelson’s method of actively querying for a MAC address. This would provide an alternative to passively waiting for a device broadcast, representing a well-known, routine design choice in network management. Whether a system passively listens for an identifier or actively requests it were known, interchangeable techniques for device discovery and authentication.
    • Expectation of Success: There was a high expectation of success, as implementing an active MAC address request protocol, as taught by Nelson, was a standard and predictable networking technique. It would have been a matter of applying a known solution to improve the functionality of the networked video system.

4. Relief Requested

  • Petitioner requests institution of an inter partes review (IPR) and cancellation of claims 1-4 of the ’964 patent as unpatentable.