Laird Technologies Inc v. Parker Intangibles LLC

Edward D. Manzo

Philip D. Segrest, Jr.

John A. Carnahan

S. Richard Carden

James V. Suggs

Joseph A. Herndon

Amir Shenouda

Prosecution History analysis

Examiner Search analysis

Invalidity Framework analysis

Form-in-place gap filler patent challenged on all 17 claims. Aakalu anticipates pre-cured gel method; Vyas & Sawa support multiple obviousness grounds.

Parker Intangibles LLC

Parker-Hannifin Corp

Laird Technologies Inc

Last Docket Entry Date

Total Docket Entries

Patent Trial and Appeal Board

IPR2018-00049 | Laird Technologies Inc v. Parker Intangibles LLC | Ex Parte

Judge	Cases	Inst. Rate	FWD Inv. Rate
Christopher L Crumbley	500+	62%	75%
Christopher M Kaiser	400+	56%	69%
Christopher M Kaiser	400+	56%	69%
George C Best	10+	50%	67%

Name	Ratings
Husch Blackwell LLP	L4 A
Edward D. Manzo	L2 C
Philip D. Segrest, Jr.	L1 C
John A. Carnahan	L1 C

Name	Ratings
Parker Intangibles LLC	L2 D
Parker-Hannifin Corp	L2 D

Name	Ratings
McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP	L3 B
S. Richard Carden	L3 B
James V. Suggs	-- -- --
Joseph A. Herndon	-- -- --
Amir Shenouda	-- -- --