Cardiovascular Systems Inc v. Shockwave Medical Inc

Mark C. Nelson

Anthony H. Son

Jeffrey R. Stone

Michael A. Stallman

Jonathan Bockman

Greg Gardella

Mehran Arjomand

Natalie J. Grace

Ruth Davila

Prosecution History analysis

Examiner Search analysis

Invalidity Framework analysis

Shockwave angioplasty catheter patent faces obviousness challenge for all 17 claims based on substituting a laser generator (Levy) with an electrode system.

Last Docket Entry Date

Total Docket Entries

IPR2019-00405 | Cardiovascular Systems Inc v. Shockwave Medical Inc | Ex Parte

Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Judge	Cases	Inst. Rate	FWD Inv. Rate
Avelyn M Ross	200+	70%	80%
Mitchell G Weatherly	500+	73%	85%
Richard H Marschall	300+	67%	86%

Name	Ratings
Barnes & Thornburg LLP	L4 A
Anthony H. Son	L5 B
Mark C. Nelson	L2 B
Jeffrey R. Stone	-- -- --

Name	Ratings
Morrison & Foerster LLP	L5 E
Mehran Arjomand	L5 E
Jonathan Bockman	L1 B
Michael A. Stallman	-- -- --
Gardella Grace PA	L2 E
Greg Gardella	L4 D
Ruth Davila	L1 D
Natalie J. Grace	-- -- --