Platinum Optics Technology Inc v. Viavi Solutions Inc

Vivian S. Kuo

Andrew R. Sommer

Justin J. Oliver

Megan S. Woodworth

Seth Boeshore

Prosecution History analysis

Examiner Search analysis

Invalidity Framework analysis

Optical filter patent challenged on anticipation & obviousness: Hendrix cited against 19 claims due to priority date loss, plus Lairson for BPF design.

Viavi Solutions Inc

Platinum Optics Technology Inc

Last Docket Entry Date

Total Docket Entries

Patent Trial and Appeal Board

IPR2022-01489 | Platinum Optics Technology Inc v. Viavi Solutions Inc | Ex Parte

Judge	Cases	Inst. Rate	FWD Inv. Rate
David C McKone	1000+	76%	85%
Debra K Stephens	300+	70%	56%
Frederick C Laney	700+	80%	83%
John A Hudalla	500+	69%	85%
Karl D Easthom	1000+	78%	88%
Paula Conn	300+	64%	77%
Sharon Fenick	300+	72%	85%

Name	Ratings
Greenberg Traurig LLP	L5 A
Andrew R. Sommer	L4 E
Vivian S. Kuo	L1 C

Name	Ratings
Venable LLP	L5 A
Justin J. Oliver	L5 A
Megan S. Woodworth	L1 C
Seth Boeshore	-- -- --