PTAB

IPR2023-01338

Stodge Inc v. Attentive Mobile Inc

General

Filed

08/19/23

Institution02/26/24

FWD--

Close02/26/24

StatusInstitution Denied

OutcomeDenied

USPTOIPR2023-01338

Administrative Patent Judges

Judge	Cases	Inst. Rate	FWD Inv. Rate
Hubert C Lorin	100+	56%	91%
Lynne H Browne	300+	52%	85%
Scott A Daniels	500+	63%	82%

Petitioner

Party

Name	Ratings
Stodge Inc	L3 E

No Parties

Attorney

Name	Ratings
Smith Baluch LLP	L3 B
Matthew A. Smith	L5 A
Andrew Baluch	L2 C

No Attorneys

Respondent

Party

Name	Ratings
Attentive Mobile Inc	L3 A
Attentive Inc	L3 A

No Parties

Attorney

Name	Ratings
Cooley LLP	L5 A
Mikaela Stone	-- -- --
King & Spalding LLP	L4 A
Brian Eutermoser	L5 A

No Attorneys