AlPineStars Spa v. Dainese Spa

Gianni Minutoli

Paul R. Steadman

Frank L. Bernstein

Robert P. Hart

Meredith M. Addy

Gregory B. Gulliver

Prosecution History analysis

Examiner Search analysis

Invalidity Framework analysis

Alpinestars targets Dainese's inflatable protective device patent, arguing all 22 claims are obvious over prior art using constraining mesh structures.

Dainese Spa

Alpinestars USA Inc

Alpinestars Spa

Last Docket Entry Date

Total Docket Entries

IPR2025-00750 | AlPineStars Spa v. Dainese Spa | Ex Parte

Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Judge	Cases	Inst. Rate	FWD Inv. Rate
Benjamin D M Wood	300+	62%	81%
Richard H Marschall	300+	67%	86%
Robert L Kinder	300+	60%	83%

Name	Ratings
Alpinestars Spa	-- -- --
Alpinestars USA Inc	-- -- --

Name	Ratings
DLA Piper US LLP	L5 D
Paul R. Steadman	L4 D
Gianni Minutoli	L4 E

Name	Ratings
Squire Patton Boggs US LLP	L2 D
Frank L. Bernstein	L2 D
Addyhart	L1 C
Meredith M. Addy	L3 C
Robert P. Hart	L1 C
Attorney at Law	-- -- --
Gregory B. Gulliver	-- -- --