PTAB

IPR2026-00207

Cisco Systems Inc v. Damaka Inc

Log In
Key Events
Petition
petition Intelligence

1. Case Identification

2. Patent Overview

  • Title: Improving Functionality in Software Applications
  • Brief Description: The ’744 patent describes a method for improving software applications on mobile devices using a modular architecture. The system comprises a main "superblock application" and a separate "function block" that provides additional capabilities (e.g., audio, video, collaboration) to the superblock without requiring the system to switch context to a different application.

3. Grounds for Unpatentability

Ground 1: Obviousness over Abuan and Guzman - Claims 1-3, 6-12, 14-17, 19-26, 28

  • Prior Art Relied Upon: Abuan (Application # 2011/0249077) and Guzman (Application # 2012/0092438).
  • Core Argument for this Ground:
    • Prior Art Mapping: Petitioner argued that Abuan taught the core architecture of the challenged claims. Abuan described a mobile videoconferencing system with a modular design where a main client application (the "superblock application") utilized separate software modules (the "function block") via APIs to provide videoconferencing functionality. This system relied on an external server for session management. Petitioner contended that Guzman taught the missing elements, specifically a video conferencing application that required a user login procedure to access a remote server, including an "auto-login" feature to streamline subsequent access.
    • Motivation to Combine: A Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art (POSITA) would combine Guzman's login and authentication procedures with Abuan’s client-server videoconferencing architecture. The motivation was to address the known need for securing access to server resources, which Abuan's system required but for which it did not disclose an access control mechanism. Adding a login requirement would mitigate the risk of server overload or denial-of-service attacks by restricting access to authorized users.
    • Expectation of Success: A POSITA would have had a reasonable expectation of success in this combination. It represented the application of a known technique (user authentication for server access) to a known system (modular videoconferencing) to achieve the predictable result of a more secure and robust application.

Ground 2: Obviousness over Abuan, Guzman, and Ludwig - Claims 4-5

  • Prior Art Relied Upon: Abuan (Application # 2011/0249077), Guzman (Application # 2012/0092438), and Ludwig (Patent 5,689,641).
  • Core Argument for this Ground:
    • Prior Art Mapping: This ground built upon the combination of Abuan and Guzman to address dependent claims 4 and 5, which recite that the communication service is a "collaboration session" or a "whiteboard session." Petitioner asserted that Ludwig taught a multimedia collaboration system that enhanced traditional videoconferencing with advanced features, including application sharing, screen sharing ("collaboration session"), and a shared whiteboard for multi-user annotation ("whiteboard session").
    • Motivation to Combine: A POSITA would combine Ludwig's advanced features with the base system of Abuan and Guzman to create a more feature-rich and competitive videoconferencing product. Ludwig explicitly described its collaboration tools as an improvement over traditional systems, providing a clear incentive for a developer to incorporate such functionalities to meet user demand for richer, more interactive remote meetings.
    • Expectation of Success: Integrating known software features like collaborative whiteboarding and screen sharing into an existing videoconferencing framework was a routine and predictable task for a POSITA, ensuring a high expectation of success.

Ground 3: Obviousness over Abuan, Guzman, and Lawson - Claims 13, 18, 27

  • Prior Art Relied Upon: Abuan (Application # 2011/0249077), Guzman (Application # 2012/0092438), and Lawson (Application # 2013/0019297).
  • Core Argument for this Ground:
    • Prior Art Mapping: This ground addressed dependent claims requiring a determination that the superblock application is authorized to access functionality provided by the function block. Petitioner argued that Lawson taught a cloud-based communication platform employing a layered security model. Specifically, Lawson described using authorization tokens within communication requests to verify that a client application had the necessary permissions to perform certain actions, such as making or receiving calls.
    • Motivation to Combine: A POSITA would incorporate Lawson's token-based authorization mechanism into the Abuan/Guzman videoconferencing system to add a more granular and robust layer of security. While Guzman taught user login, Lawson provided a mechanism for verifying authorization for specific actions within a session, which would be a logical enhancement to secure communication channels against malicious parties, as Lawson itself suggested.
    • Expectation of Success: A POSITA would have reasonably expected to successfully integrate Lawson’s token-based security model into the Abuan/Guzman system. Implementing authorization checks is a common practice in client-server architectures to secure communication, and the result of a more secure application would have been predictable.

4. Relief Requested

  • Petitioner requests institution of an inter partes review and cancellation of claims 1-28 of the ’744 patent as unpatentable.