YK Law LLP

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases14

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

Practice Areas

DesignMech Eng, ManufSemicond., Optic

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
11/21/24	Wang v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:24-CV-11983 ( N.D. IL )	ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lucky Wang by Faye Yifei Deng (Deng, Faye Yifei) (Entered: 11/21/2024)
11/21/24	Wang v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:24-CV-11983 ( N.D. IL )	CIVIL Cover Sheet (Deng, Faye Yifei) (Entered: 11/21/2024)
11/21/24	Wang v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:24-CV-11983 ( N.D. IL )	MOTION by Plaintiff Lucky Wang for Leave to File Under Seal (Deng, Faye Yifei) (Entered: 11/21/2024)
11/21/24	Wang v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:24-CV-11983 ( N.D. IL )	SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Lucky Wang Exhibit 1 regarding Complaint1 (Deng, Faye Yifei) (Entered: 11/21/2024)
11/21/24	Wang v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:24-CV-11983 ( N.D. IL )	SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Lucky Wang Schedule A regarding complaint1 (Deng, Faye Yifei) (Entered: 11/21/2024)
11/21/24	Wang v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:24-CV-11983 ( N.D. IL )	COMPLAINT filed by Lucky Wang; jury demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22755376. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit 2, # [2] Exhibit 3, # [3] Exhibit 4)(Deng, Faye Yifei) (Entered: 11/21/2024)
11/15/24	Shenzhen Qinyi Technologies Co Ltd v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:24-CV-11693 ( N.D. IL )	MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (jxm, ) (Entered: 11/15/2024)
10/30/24	Qiu v. Riding'Times Direct 1:24-CV-07596 ( E.D. NY )	COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Guichun Qiu. (Attachments: # [1] Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Weiner, Jesse) (Entered: 10/30/2024)
10/22/24	Zhang v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:24-CV-10804 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: This case was filed against 94 defendants for selling ceiling fans that allegedly infringe a design patent registered to Plaintiff. Under Rule 20, a plaintiff may join multiple defendants in a single action if: (1) the claims against them are asserted "with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences," and (2) a "question of law or fact common to all defendants" exists. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2)(A)(B). In reviewing the filings in this case, it does not appear that joinder is proper as to all Defendants. As the Court stated in Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Cos., Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, alleging that multiple defendants have infringed on the same copyright, trademark, or patent in the same way, without more, does not create the substantial evidentiary overlap required to find joinder proper. No. 23 C 17036, 2024 WL 1858592, at 67 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 29, 2024). The Court directs Plaintiff to file an amended complaint by 11/5/2024, as well as a statement on joinder explaining how the remaining Defendants comply with the Court's order in Roadget. Mailed notice (rj, ) (Entered: 10/22/2024) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: This case was filed against 94 defendants for selling ceiling fans that allegedly infringe a design patent registered to Plaintiff. Under Rule 20, a plaintiff may join multiple defendants in a single action if: (1) the claims against them are asserted "with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences," and (2) a "question of law or fact common to all defendants" exists. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2)(A)(B). In reviewing the filings in this case, it does not appear that joinder is proper as to all Defendants. As the Court stated in Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Cos., Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, alleging that multiple defendants have infringed on the same copyright, trademark, or patent in the same way, without more, does not create the substantial evidentiary overlap required to find joinder proper. No. 23 C 17036, 2024 WL 1858592, at 67 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 29, 2024). The Court directs Plaintiff to file an amended complaint by 11/5/2024, as well as a statement on joinder explaining how the remaining Defendants comply with the Court's order in Roadget. Mailed notice (rj, ) (Entered: 10/22/2024)
10/18/24	Wicue USA Inc v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:24-CV-09029 ( N.D. IL )	RESPONSE by Wicue USA, Inc.in Support of SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff WICUE USA, INC. for a Temporary Restraining Order, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Alternative Service [10] (Dinardo, Michael) (Entered: 10/18/2024)