Chen Malin LLP

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases57

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

Practice Areas

Comp. Arch. and SoftwareCommunicationsSemicond., Optic

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
07/26/23	Hybrid Audio LLC v. Asus Computer Inter 3:17-CV-05947 ( N.D. CA )	NOTICE of Declination of Magistrate Judge by ASUSTeK Computer Inc, Asus Computer International Inc re 197 Status Conference (Joshi, Vinay) (Filed on 7/26/2023) Modified on 7/26/2023 (gba, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 07/26/2023)
07/26/23	Hybrid Audio LLC v. Asus Computer Inter 3:17-CV-05947 ( N.D. CA )	CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Hybrid Audio, LLC.. (Devlin, Timothy) (Filed on 7/26/2023) (Entered: 07/26/2023)
06/04/20	Technology Properties Ltd LLC v. Canon Inc 4:14-CV-03640 ( N.D. CA )	NOTICE by Canon Inc. , Canon U.S.A. Inc. of Withdrawal of Attorney Patrick J. O'Rear (Hertko, Matthew) (Filed on 6/4/2020)
06/28/19	Tinnus Enterprisess LLC v. Telebrands Corp 6:16-CV-00033 ( E.D. TX )	*FILED IN ERROR IN WRONG CASE. PLEASE DISREGARD.ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Court, having considered Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice, hereby ORDERS that all claims between Plaintiffs and Defendant are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and fees. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 6/28/2019. (rlf) Modified on 6/28/2019 (rlf). (Entered: 06/28/2019) FILED IN ERROR IN WRONG CASE. PLEASE DISREGARD.*ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Court, having considered Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice, hereby ORDERS that all claims between Plaintiffs and Defendant are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and fees. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 6/28/2019. (rlf) Modified on 6/28/2019 (rlf). (Entered: 06/28/2019)
06/28/19	Tinnus Enterprisess LLC v. Telebrands Corp 6:16-CV-00033 ( E.D. TX )	*FILED IN ERROR. Document # 748, Order of Dismissal. FILED IN WRONG CASE. PLEASE IGNORE.* (rlf) (Entered: 06/28/2019)
04/23/19	Document Security Systems Inc v. Everlight Electronics Co Ltd 2:17-CV-04273 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge James V. Selna, The motion is hereby GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-captioned litigation is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, as follows: 1. All claims and counterclaims between DSS and Everlight asserted in the above-captioned litigation are dismissed in their entirety, with prejudice. 2. The parties shall each bear their own costs and attorneys fees associated with the above-captioned litigation. 87 (es) (Entered: 04/23/2019) ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge James V. Selna, The motion is hereby GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-captioned litigation is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, as follows: 1. All claims and counterclaims between DSS and Everlight asserted in the above-captioned litigation are dismissed in their entirety, with prejudice. 2. The parties shall each bear their own costs and attorneys fees associated with the above-captioned litigation. 87 (es) (Entered: 04/23/2019)
04/23/19	Document Security Systems Inc v. Everlight Electronics Co Ltd 2:17-CV-04273 ( C.D. CA )	Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41(a) filed by Plaintiff Document Security Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ledahl, Brian) (Entered: 04/23/2019)
04/02/19	Mass Engineered Design Inc v. Planar Systems Inc 3:16-CV-01510 ( D. OR )	Supplemental Declaration of Andrew T. Oliver . (DOCUMENT RESTRICTED ACCORDING TO PROTECTIVE ORDER) Filed by Planar Systems Inc. . (Related document(s): Sur-Reply to Motion, [458] .) (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit A, # [2] Exhibit B) (Dahab, Nadia).
04/02/19	Mass Engineered Design Inc v. Planar Systems Inc 3:16-CV-01510 ( D. OR )	Sur-Reply In Opposition to Motion for Attorney Fees and Exceptional Case Finding Per 35 USC Â§ 285 [441] . (DOCUMENT RESTRICTED ACCORDING TO PROTECTIVE ORDER) Filed by Planar Systems Inc. . (Dahab, Nadia).