McCartney Dallmann LLP

California

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases34

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

Practice Areas

Mech Eng, ManufCommunicationsTransport., E-Comm.

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
09/03/24	Artax LLC v. Teletrac Navman US Ltd 8:24-CV-01897 ( C.D. CA )	21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 as to Defendant Teletrac Navman US Ltd.. (sh) (Entered: 09/03/2024)
09/03/24	Artax LLC v. Teletrac Navman US Ltd 8:24-CV-01897 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Attachments: # 1 CV-11C) (sh) (Entered: 09/03/2024)
08/19/24	Wireless Protocol Innovations Inc v. TCL Corp 8:23-CV-01476 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER REGADING JOINT NOTICE OF RESOLUTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY CASE by Judge George H Wu, re Stipulation to Stay Case [283] : Having considered the Stipulation, the Court finds that it should be in all respects GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all deadlines in Case No. 8:23-cv-01476- GW-RAOx are stayed pending Defendants' final payment pursuant the parties' settlement agreement, which is due no later than January 31, 2025. Upon Plaintiff's receipt of Defendants' final payment, the parties shall dismiss this case with prejudice within three days, or by Monday, February 3, 2024, whichever is earlier. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all current deadlines and settings in this case, including the Final Pretrial Conference and Jury Trial, are vacated. (bm) (Entered: 08/19/2024) ORDER REGADING JOINT NOTICE OF RESOLUTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY CASE by Judge George H Wu, re Stipulation to Stay Case [283] : Having considered the Stipulation, the Court finds that it should be in all respects GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all deadlines in Case No. 8:23-cv-01476- GW-RAOx are stayed pending Defendants' final payment pursuant the parties' settlement agreement, which is due no later than January 31, 2025. Upon Plaintiff's receipt of Defendants' final payment, the parties shall dismiss this case with prejudice within three days, or by Monday, February 3, 2024, whichever is earlier. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all current deadlines and settings in this case, including the Final Pretrial Conference and Jury Trial, are vacated. (bm) (Entered: 08/19/2024)
08/19/24	Wireless Protocol Innovations Inc v. TCL Corp 8:23-CV-01476 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES OF TELEPHONIC HEARING ON JOINT NOTICE OF RESOLUTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY CASE [283] held before Judge George H Wu: Court and counsel confer. The Court approves the stipulation to stay the case. Separate order to issue. A status conference is set for February 6, 2025 at 8:30 a.m. The parties are to file a stipulation to dismiss, or a joint status report by noon on February 3, 2025. All previously set deadlines and hearing dates are vacated. Court Reporter: Terri A. Hourigan. (bm) (Entered: 08/19/2024) MINUTES OF TELEPHONIC HEARING ON JOINT NOTICE OF RESOLUTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY CASE [283] held before Judge George H Wu: Court and counsel confer. The Court approves the stipulation to stay the case. Separate order to issue. A status conference is set for February 6, 2025 at 8:30 a.m. The parties are to file a stipulation to dismiss, or a joint status report by noon on February 3, 2025. All previously set deadlines and hearing dates are vacated. Court Reporter: Terri A. Hourigan. (bm) (Entered: 08/19/2024)
07/31/24	Semiled Innovations LLC v. Topaz Lighting Corp 2:23-CV-07219 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (rolm) (Entered: 07/31/2024)
07/24/24	Mitsubishi Electronic Corporation v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited 8:22-CV-01073 ( C.D. CA )	Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case filed by plaintiffs Mitsubishi Electronic Corporation, Sisvel International, S.A.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Lennon, James) (Entered: 07/24/2024)
08/16/23	Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co Ltd v. TCL China Star Optoelectronics Technology Co Ltd 8:21-CV-00554 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE DECEMBER 12, 2022 TRANSCRIPT 292 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. (yl) (Entered: 08/16/2023)
05/31/22	Innovative Imports Inc v. 5150 Whips Inc 5:21-CV-01130 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 Order Dismissing Action) (gk) (Entered: 05/31/2022)
05/31/22	Innovative Imports Inc v. 5150 Whips Inc 5:21-CV-01130 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation 37, the Court hereby ORDERS this action DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety, including all claims and counterclaims, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk) (Entered: 05/31/2022) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation 37, the Court hereby ORDERS this action DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety, including all claims and counterclaims, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk) (Entered: 05/31/2022)
05/31/22	Innovative Imports Inc v. Cameron Murray 5:21-CV-01135 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge John W. Holcomb. The Court, having reviewed the parties' joint stipulation for dismissal with prejudice of the entire action (Dkt. No. 34), hereby ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety, including all claims and counterclaims, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) (Entered: 05/31/2022) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge John W. Holcomb. The Court, having reviewed the parties' joint stipulation for dismissal with prejudice of the entire action (Dkt. No. 34), hereby ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety, including all claims and counterclaims, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) (Entered: 05/31/2022)