Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman Dicker LLP

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases114

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

wilson-elser

wilsonelser.com

Practice Areas

Mech Eng, ManufBiotechTransport., E-Comm.

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
12/04/24	Intrepid Automation Inc v. 3D Systems Corp 3:24-CV-02262 ( S.D. CA )	NOTICE Corporate Disclosure Statement by Intrepid Automation, Inc. (Potiker, Anne) (Entered: 12/04/2024)
12/04/24	Intrepid Automation Inc v. 3D Systems Corp 3:24-CV-02262 ( S.D. CA )	NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Intrepid Automation, Inc. of case(s) 3:21-cv-01141-AGS-DDL . (Potiker, Anne) (Entered: 12/04/2024)
12/04/24	Intrepid Automation Inc v. 3D Systems Corp 3:24-CV-02262 ( S.D. CA )	NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Intrepid Automation, Inc. of case(s) 21-cv-01141-AGS-DDL. (yxc) (Entered: 12/04/2024)
12/04/24	Intrepid Automation Inc v. 3D Systems Corp 3:24-CV-02262 ( S.D. CA )	Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (yxc) (Entered: 12/04/2024)
12/04/24	Intrepid Automation Inc v. 3D Systems Corp 3:24-CV-02262 ( S.D. CA )	REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) 11,014,301, 11,338,511 cc:USPTO (yxc) (Entered: 12/04/2024)
12/04/24	Intrepid Automation Inc v. 3D Systems Corp 3:24-CV-02262 ( S.D. CA )	COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against 3D Systems Corporation, 3D Systems, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-19402626.), filed by Intrepid Automation, Inc.. (Attachments: # [1] Civil Cover Sheet, # [2] Exhibit 1, # [3] Exhibit 2, # [4] Exhibit 3, # [5] Exhibit 4, # [6] Exhibit 5, # [7] Exhibit 6, # [8] Exhibit 7, # [9] Exhibit 8, # [10] Exhibit 9, # [11] Exhibit 10)The new case number is 3:24-cv-2262-BEN-AHG. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case. (Potiker, Anne)(yxc) (Entered: 12/04/2024) COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against 3D Systems Corporation, 3D Systems, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-19402626.), filed by Intrepid Automation, Inc.. (Attachments: # [1] Civil Cover Sheet, # [2] Exhibit 1, # [3] Exhibit 2, # [4] Exhibit 3, # [5] Exhibit 4, # [6] Exhibit 5, # [7] Exhibit 6, # [8] Exhibit 7, # [9] Exhibit 8, # [10] Exhibit 9, # [11] Exhibit 10)The new case number is 3:24-cv-2262-BEN-AHG. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case. (Potiker, Anne)(yxc) (Entered: 12/04/2024)
10/31/23	Epitracker Inc v. Agoura Health Products LLC 2:23-CV-08772 ( C.D. CA )	PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Epitracker Inc., Seraphina Therapeutics Inc, upon Defendant Steven R. Gundry served on 10/24/2023, answer due 11/14/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Steven R. Gundry in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Neubauer, Mark) (Entered: 10/31/2023)
08/18/23	Carr v. Homeland Patrol Division Security LLC 2:23-CV-00417 ( W.D. WA )	MINUTE ORDER (text only) made at the direction of Judge Tana Lin: Pursuant to the Parties' 32 Notice of Settlement and in accordance with Section V of the Court's Standing Order for All Civil Cases, It is hereby ORDERED that the Parties shall submit a stipulated dismissal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), within ninety (90) days from the date of this Order. If the Parties do not submit a stipulated dismissal by the ab ove deadline, the Court will enter its standard order of post-settlement dismissal, allowing the Parties to reopen the case if they have not perfected the settlement agreement within sixty (60) days of the dismissal order. It is further ORDERED that all pending motions, deadlines, and hearings in this case, including the trial date, are STRICKEN. (MJV) (Entered: 08/18/2023) MINUTE ORDER (text only) made at the direction of Judge Tana Lin: Pursuant to the Parties' 32 Notice of Settlement and in accordance with Section V of the Court's Standing Order for All Civil Cases, It is hereby ORDERED that the Parties shall submit a stipulated dismissal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), within ninety (90) days from the date of this Order. If the Parties do not submit a stipulated dismissal by the ab ove deadline, the Court will enter its standard order of post-settlement dismissal, allowing the Parties to reopen the case if they have not perfected the settlement agreement within sixty (60) days of the dismissal order. It is further ORDERED that all pending motions, deadlines, and hearings in this case, including the trial date, are STRICKEN. (MJV) (Entered: 08/18/2023)
08/08/23	Performancepartners LLC v. Laz Parking Texas LLC 3:23-CV-00565 ( N.D. TX )	ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The Court ORDERS the following: By Tuesday, August 15, 2023, Plaintiff PerformancePartners LLC must file such notice or otherwise SHOW CAUSE in writing why this deadline has not been met. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 8/8/2023) (svc) (Entered: 08/08/2023)
08/01/23	Richardson v. Pond5 Inc 1:22-CV-04963 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER terminating 48 Motion to Strike document 48 FIRST MOTION to Strike Document No. 45 Defendants' Affirmative Defenses.FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Counterclaims. filed by Douglas G. Richardson from the record.; terminating 48 Motion to Dismiss. In light of case resolution, motions are terminated as moot. (HEREBY ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker)(Text Only Order) (Parker, Katharine) (Entered: 08/01/2023) ORDER terminating 48 Motion to Strike document 48 FIRST MOTION to Strike Document No. 45 Defendants' Affirmative Defenses.FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Counterclaims. filed by Douglas G. Richardson from the record.; terminating 48 Motion to Dismiss. In light of case resolution, motions are terminated as moot. (HEREBY ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker)(Text Only Order) (Parker, Katharine) (Entered: 08/01/2023)