Bochetto & Lentz

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases19

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

bochetto-lentz

bochettoandlentz.com

Practice Areas

Transport., E-Comm.ChemicalDesign

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
01/30/23	MCS Industries Inc v. At Home Stores LLC 5:22-CV-03436 ( E.D. PA )	ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41.1(b). SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 1/30/23. 1/30/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(bac) (Entered: 01/30/2023)
11/17/22	Storebound LLC v. Sensio Inc 1:22-CV-05967 ( S.D. NY )	AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 11/17/2022 in a court action filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (Attachments: # 1 order).(kv) (Entered: 11/17/2022) AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 11/17/2022 in a court action filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (Attachments: # 1 order).(kv) (Entered: 11/17/2022)
11/17/22	Storebound LLC v. Sensio Inc 1:22-CV-05967 ( S.D. NY )	STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL: The undersigned parties hereby voluntarily dismiss all claims and counterclaims asserted in this action pursuant TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) with prejudice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 11/17/2022) (kv) (Entered: 11/17/2022)
11/17/22	Storebound LLC v. Sensio Inc 1:22-CV-05967 ( S.D. NY )	STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Storebound LLC, Sensio, Inc. pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Storebound LLC. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Lentz, Gavin) (Entered: 11/17/2022) STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Storebound LLC, Sensio, Inc. pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Storebound LLC. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Lentz, Gavin) (Entered: 11/17/2022)
11/17/22	Storebound LLC v. Sensio Inc 1:22-CV-05967 ( S.D. NY )	*NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney Gavin Lentz. RE-FILE Document No. 21 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the stipulation of voluntary dismissal was not physically signed by all parties who have appeared. Re-file the document using the event type Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - select the correct party/parties the voluntary dismissal is against - and attach the correct signed (scanned ink signature image) PDF. (tp) (Entered: 11/17/2022) *NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney Gavin Lentz. RE-FILE Document No. 21 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the stipulation of voluntary dismissal was not physically signed by all parties who have appeared. Re-file the document using the event type Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - select the correct party/parties the voluntary dismissal is against - and attach the correct signed (scanned ink signature image) PDF. (tp) (Entered: 11/17/2022)
06/02/22	Anova Applied Electronics Inc v. Storebound LLC 1:21-CV-10552 ( S.D. NY )	SO-ORDERED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the covenants, terms, and conditions hereinafter expressed and good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows intending to be bound legally: (As further set forth herein.) The action is dismissed with prejudice on the parties' consent. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 6/1/2022) (va) (Entered: 06/02/2022) SO-ORDERED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the covenants, terms, and conditions hereinafter expressed and good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows intending to be bound legally: (As further set forth herein.) The action is dismissed with prejudice on the parties' consent. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 6/1/2022) (va) (Entered: 06/02/2022)
03/07/22	MCS Industries Inc v. Aldi Inc 5:21-CV-03828 ( E.D. PA )	ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41.1(b). SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 3/7/22. 3/7/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(bac) (Entered: 03/07/2022)
09/10/21	MCS Industries Inc v. Aldi Inc 5:21-CV-03828 ( E.D. PA )	Final Civil Docket 03-07-2022
10/17/18	Innovative Environmental Tech Inc v. Total Petrochemicals & Refining USA Inc 2:18-CV-03211 ( E.D. PA )	STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT IS DUE BY 11/24/18. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 10/16/18. 10/17/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, ) (Entered: 10/17/2018)
10/11/18	Innovative Environmental Tech Inc v. Total Petrochemicals & Refining USA Inc 2:18-CV-03211 ( E.D. PA )	MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by RETIA, LLC, TOTAL PETROCHEMICALS & REFINING USA, INC..Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Declaration of Christopher H. Blaszkowski, # 3 Exhibit A, Petition for Inter Partes Review Dated 11/17/15, # 4 Exhibit B, Petition for Inter Partes Review Dated 11/24/15, # 5 Exhibit C, InterPartes Review Institution Decision Dated 5/5/16, # 6 Exhibit D, Inter Partes Review Institution Decision Dated 5/16/16, # 7 Exhibit E, Inter Partes Review Termination Order Dated 10/21/16, # 8 Exhibit F, Request for Ex Parte Reexamination Dated 8/18/17, # 9 Exhibit G, Notice of Reexamination Request Filing Dated 8/29/17, # 10 Exhibit H, Reexamination Order Dated 10/2/17, # 11 Exhibit I, Non-Final Office Action Dated 1/11/18, # 12 Exhibit J, Examiner Interview Summary Dated 3/23/18, # 13 Exhibit K, Applicant Interview Summary Dated 3/20/18, # 14 Exhibit L, Amendment in Response to Non-Final Office Action Dated 3/26/18, # 15 Exhibit M, Allergan Sales LLC v. Sandoz, Inc., # 16 Exhibit N, Water Technologies Corporation v. Aurora SFC Systems, Inc., # 17 Text of Proposed Order)(LEACE, BENJAMIN) (Entered: 10/11/2018) MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by RETIA, LLC, TOTAL PETROCHEMICALS & REFINING USA, INC..Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Declaration of Christopher H. Blaszkowski, # 3 Exhibit A, Petition for Inter Partes Review Dated 11/17/15, # 4 Exhibit B, Petition for Inter Partes Review Dated 11/24/15, # 5 Exhibit C, InterPartes Review Institution Decision Dated 5/5/16, # 6 Exhibit D, Inter Partes Review Institution Decision Dated 5/16/16, # 7 Exhibit E, Inter Partes Review Termination Order Dated 10/21/16, # 8 Exhibit F, Request for Ex Parte Reexamination Dated 8/18/17, # 9 Exhibit G, Notice of Reexamination Request Filing Dated 8/29/17, # 10 Exhibit H, Reexamination Order Dated 10/2/17, # 11 Exhibit I, Non-Final Office Action Dated 1/11/18, # 12 Exhibit J, Examiner Interview Summary Dated 3/23/18, # 13 Exhibit K, Applicant Interview Summary Dated 3/20/18, # 14 Exhibit L, Amendment in Response to Non-Final Office Action Dated 3/26/18, # 15 Exhibit M, Allergan Sales LLC v. Sandoz, Inc., # 16 Exhibit N, Water Technologies Corporation v. Aurora SFC Systems, Inc., # 17 Text of Proposed Order)(LEACE, BENJAMIN) (Entered: 10/11/2018)