Walder Hayden PA

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases14

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

pashman-stein

pashmanstein.com

Practice Areas

Mech Eng, ManufChemicalDesign

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
09/03/24	Zirvi v. Illumina Inc 2:23-CV-01997 ( D. NJ )	NOTICE OF APPEAL as to [139] Order on Motion for Reconsideration, [119] Order, by MONIB ZIRVI. Filing fee $ 605, receipt number ANJDC-15632736. The Clerk's Office hereby certifies the record and the docket sheet available through ECF to be the certified list in lieu of the record and/or the certified copy of the docket entries. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit)(AGRAWAL, AMAR) (Entered: 09/03/2024)
05/31/23	Voltstar Tech Inc v. B&H Photo Video 1:22-CV-08429 ( S.D. NY )	AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 5/31/23 in a court action filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(yv) (Entered: 05/31/2023) AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 5/31/23 in a court action filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(yv) (Entered: 05/31/2023)
05/31/23	Voltstar Tech Inc v. B&H Photo Video 1:22-CV-08429 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER OF DISMISSAL... The Court, having been advised at ECF No. 33 that the parties have reached a settlement, hereby ORDERS that the above-entitled action be and is hereby DISMISSED and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within 30 days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed by the aforementioned deadline; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, requests to extend the deadline to reopen are unlikely to be granted. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to reopen to be so ordered by the Court. Per Paragraph 6.A of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are cancelled. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jennifer H. Rearden on 5/31/23) (yv) (Entered: 05/31/2023) ORDER OF DISMISSAL... The Court, having been advised at ECF No. 33 that the parties have reached a settlement, hereby ORDERS that the above-entitled action be and is hereby DISMISSED and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within 30 days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed by the aforementioned deadline; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, requests to extend the deadline to reopen are unlikely to be granted. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to reopen to be so ordered by the Court. Per Paragraph 6.A of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are cancelled. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jennifer H. Rearden on 5/31/23) (yv) (Entered: 05/31/2023)
05/31/23	Voltstar Tech Inc v. B&H Photo Video 1:22-CV-08429 ( S.D. NY )	MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 33 Notice of Settlement filed by Voltstar Technologies, Inc. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff's request at ECF No. 33 is GRANTED. By June 30, 2023, the parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal for the attention of the Honorable Jennifer H. Rearden. In light of the parties' settlement, the telephonic conference scheduled for June 1, 2023 is CANCELLED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the June 1, 2023 conference. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 5/31/2023) (tg) (Entered: 05/31/2023) MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 33 Notice of Settlement filed by Voltstar Technologies, Inc. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff's request at ECF No. 33 is GRANTED. By June 30, 2023, the parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal for the attention of the Honorable Jennifer H. Rearden. In light of the parties' settlement, the telephonic conference scheduled for June 1, 2023 is CANCELLED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the June 1, 2023 conference. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 5/31/2023) (tg) (Entered: 05/31/2023)
05/10/21	Filtermag Inc v. Filtermag Intl Inc 2:20-CV-01827 ( D. AZ )	ORDER that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Withdraw (Doc. 30 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is kindly instructed to terminate Kenneth J. Ashman as counsel of record for Plaintiff. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to close this case. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 5/10/2021. (CLB) (Entered: 05/10/2021) ORDER that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Withdraw (Doc. 30 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is kindly instructed to terminate Kenneth J. Ashman as counsel of record for Plaintiff. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to close this case. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 5/10/2021. (CLB) (Entered: 05/10/2021)
09/17/20	Filtermag Inc v. Filtermag Intl Inc 2:20-CV-01827 ( D. AZ )	Final Civil Docket 05-10-2021
02/05/21	Social Positioning Input Systems LLC v. Brick House Electronics LLC 1:20-CV-06433 ( S.D. NY )	JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL: Now comes Plaintiff, Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC and Defendant Brickhouse Electronics, LLC, by their respective undersigned counsel, hereby STIPULATE and AGREE as follows: 1. All claims asserted by the Plaintiff in this Action are dismissed with prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); 2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys fees with respect to the matters dismissed hereby; This Stipulation and Order shall finally resolve the Action between the parties. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 2/4/21) (yv) (Entered: 02/05/2021) JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL: Now comes Plaintiff, Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC and Defendant Brickhouse Electronics, LLC, by their respective undersigned counsel, hereby STIPULATE and AGREE as follows: 1. All claims asserted by the Plaintiff in this Action are dismissed with prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); 2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys fees with respect to the matters dismissed hereby; This Stipulation and Order shall finally resolve the Action between the parties. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 2/4/21) (yv) (Entered: 02/05/2021)
10/18/20	Cedar Lane Tech Inc v. B & H Foto Electronics Corp 1:20-CV-04977 ( S.D. NY )	AO [120] FORM PATENT - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 10/18/2020 in a court action filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (mro) AO [120] FORM PATENT - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 10/18/2020 in a court action filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (mro)
10/18/20	Cedar Lane Tech Inc v. B & H Foto Electronics Corp 1:20-CV-04977 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: The request to dismiss this matter without prejudice is hereby GRANTED. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 10/18/2020) (mro)