Bateman IP Law Group

Utah

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases33

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

Practice Areas

Transport., E-Comm.Mech Eng, ManufSemicond., Optic

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
03/01/23	Bala Bangles Inc v. Ea Commerce LLC 2:22-CV-00655 ( D. UT )	Report on the Final Decision of an action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (mh) (Entered: 03/01/2023)
03/01/23	Bala Bangles Inc v. Ea Commerce LLC 2:22-CV-00655 ( D. UT )	NOTICE FROM THE COURT. On March 1, 2023, the parties filed their 50 Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the stipulated dismissal with prejudice is self-effectuating. The case has been dismissed with prejudice per the terms of the stipulated dismissal, no fees, costs, or expenses awarded as to any party. (aja) (Entered: 03/01/2023)
03/01/23	Bala Bangles Inc v. Ea Commerce LLC 2:22-CV-00655 ( D. UT )	Civil Case Terminated per 51 Notice from The Court. Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero no longer assigned to case. Case closed. (mh) (Entered: 03/01/2023)
09/04/19	Avus Holdings v. Muir 2:19-CV-00228 ( D. UT )	STATUS REPORT ORDER. On 06/07/2019, the court issued 26 ORDER granting 25 Stipulated Motion for Stay Pending Settlement Discussions, which stayed this action for a period of 30 days after the date of that order. That order further provided that if the parties did not reach a settlement, the parties would provide the court a stipulated schedule on or before 07/05/2019. That deadline has passed without any further activity in this action. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before 09/20/2019, the parties shall file a joint report with the court indicating the status of this action and their intentions to proceed. Status Report due by 9/20/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 09/04/2019. (docket text order; no attached document) (jcd) (Entered: 09/04/2019) STATUS REPORT ORDER. On 06/07/2019, the court issued 26 ORDER granting 25 Stipulated Motion for Stay Pending Settlement Discussions, which stayed this action for a period of 30 days after the date of that order. That order further provided that if the parties did not reach a settlement, the parties would provide the court a stipulated schedule on or before 07/05/2019. That deadline has passed without any further activity in this action. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before 09/20/2019, the parties shall file a joint report with the court indicating the status of this action and their intentions to proceed. Status Report due by 9/20/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 09/04/2019. (docket text order; no attached document) (jcd) (Entered: 09/04/2019)
04/24/19	Avus Holdings v. Muir 2:19-CV-00228 ( D. UT )	Defendants ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against Avus Holdings filed by Next Distributions Inc, Patrick C. Muir, Next Distributions LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A- 856 Patent, # 2 Exhibit B - 608 Patent, # 3 Exhibit C- Document Meta Data)(Bateman, Randall) (Entered: 04/24/2019)
04/24/19	Avus Holdings v. Muir 2:19-CV-00228 ( D. UT )	NOTICE of Appearance by Randall B. Bateman on behalf of Patrick C. Muir, Next Distributions Inc, Next Distributions LLC (Bateman, Randall) (Entered: 04/24/2019)
04/04/19	Avus Holdings v. Muir 2:19-CV-00228 ( D. UT )	ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 4/4/2019. (las) (Entered: 04/04/2019) ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 4/4/2019. (las) (Entered: 04/04/2019)
04/04/19	Avus Holdings v. Muir 2:19-CV-00228 ( D. UT )	Report on the Filing of an action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (tlh) (Entered: 04/04/2019)
10/16/19	Avus Holdings v. Muir 2:19-CV-00228 ( D. UT )	Report on the Final Decision of an action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Stipulated Permanent Injunction) (dla) (Entered: 10/16/2019)
10/16/19	Avus Holdings v. Muir 2:19-CV-00228 ( D. UT )	STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION. Case Closed. Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 10/16/19. (dla) (Entered: 10/16/2019)