Bishop Diehl & Lee LTD

Illinois

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases123

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

Practice Areas

Mech Eng, ManufDesignTransport., E-Comm.

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
02/05/25	Bling Mirror LLC v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:24-CV-13409 ( N.D. IL )	PRELIMINARY Injunction Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 2/5/2025. Mailed notice(lk, ) (Entered: 02/05/2025)
02/05/25	Bling Mirror LLC v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:24-CV-13409 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Motion hearing held on 2/5/2025. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction [19] is granted. Order to follow. Status hearing set for 3/5/2025 at 9:30 AM. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 02/05/2025)
02/05/25	Bling Mirror LLC v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:24-CV-13409 ( N.D. IL )	NOTICE of Correction regarding Copyright Report [25] (ksr, ) (Entered: 02/05/2025)
02/05/25	Bling Mirror LLC v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:24-CV-13409 ( N.D. IL )	ENTERED IN ERROR Modified on 2/5/2025 (ksr, ). (Entered: 02/05/2025)
01/23/25	Pranash Tianjin Technology Development Co Ltd v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:24-CV-04156 ( N.D. IL )	DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 1/23/2025. Mailed notice (ags) (Entered: 01/23/2025)
01/23/25	Pranash Tianjin Technology Development Co Ltd v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:24-CV-04156 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Motion hearing held. The motion for default judgment [62] is granted and after considering the arguments of counsel, the court concludes that a reasonable royalty, inclusive of transaction costs, is $5,000. The court declines to award treble damages because the royalty is high enough to provide deterrence against willful infringement without trebling. The court has doubts about finding this type of infringement on default exceptional and awarding attorney's fees based solely on the defendants' failure to participate. There is nothing exceptional about processing a default on a design patent case where there has been no showing of actual competitive harm and plaintiff is effectively treating the court as a clerical arm of the USPTO. Nevertheless, the court makes the finding and awards the reasonable fee requested to provide an added deterrent to willful infringement. Enter Default Judgment Order. Terminate civil case. Mailed notice (ags) (Entered: 01/23/2025) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Motion hearing held. The motion for default judgment [62] is granted and after considering the arguments of counsel, the court concludes that a reasonable royalty, inclusive of transaction costs, is $5,000. The court declines to award treble damages because the royalty is high enough to provide deterrence against willful infringement without trebling. The court has doubts about finding this type of infringement on default exceptional and awarding attorney's fees based solely on the defendants' failure to participate. There is nothing exceptional about processing a default on a design patent case where there has been no showing of actual competitive harm and plaintiff is effectively treating the court as a clerical arm of the USPTO. Nevertheless, the court makes the finding and awards the reasonable fee requested to provide an added deterrent to willful infringement. Enter Default Judgment Order. Terminate civil case. Mailed notice (ags) (Entered: 01/23/2025)
01/09/25	Shanghai Xingqi Electronic Technology Co Ltd v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:25-CV-00272 ( N.D. IL )	ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Shanghai Xingqi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. by Edward L. Bishop (Bishop, Edward) (Entered: 01/09/2025)
01/09/25	Shanghai Xingqi Electronic Technology Co Ltd v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:25-CV-00272 ( N.D. IL )	NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Shanghai Xingqi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. (Bishop, Edward) (Entered: 01/09/2025)
01/09/25	Shanghai Xingqi Electronic Technology Co Ltd v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:25-CV-00272 ( N.D. IL )	SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Shanghai Xingqi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Exhibit 2B (Attachments: # [1] Defendant 24, # [2] Defendant 25, # [3] Defendant 26, # [4] Defendant 27, # [5] Defendant 28, # [6] Defendant 29, # [7] Defendant 30, # [8] Defendant 31, # [9] Defendant 32, # [10] Defendant 33, # [11] Defendant 34, # [12] Defendant 35, # [13] Defendant 36, # [14] Defendant 37, # [15] Defendant 38, # [16] Defendant 39, # [17] Defendant 40, # [18] Defendant 41, # [19] Defendant 42, # [20] Defendant 43, # [21] Defendant 44, # [22] Defendant 45, # [23] Defendant 46)(Bishop, Edward) (Entered: 01/09/2025) SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Shanghai Xingqi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Exhibit 2B (Attachments: # [1] Defendant 24, # [2] Defendant 25, # [3] Defendant 26, # [4] Defendant 27, # [5] Defendant 28, # [6] Defendant 29, # [7] Defendant 30, # [8] Defendant 31, # [9] Defendant 32, # [10] Defendant 33, # [11] Defendant 34, # [12] Defendant 35, # [13] Defendant 36, # [14] Defendant 37, # [15] Defendant 38, # [16] Defendant 39, # [17] Defendant 40, # [18] Defendant 41, # [19] Defendant 42, # [20] Defendant 43, # [21] Defendant 44, # [22] Defendant 45, # [23] Defendant 46)(Bishop, Edward) (Entered: 01/09/2025)
01/09/25	Shanghai Xingqi Electronic Technology Co Ltd v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:25-CV-00272 ( N.D. IL )	SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Shanghai Xingqi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Exhibit 2A (Attachments: # [1] Defendant 2, # [2] Defendant 3, # [3] Defendant 4, # [4] Defendant 5, # [5] Defendant 6, # [6] Defendant 7, # [7] Defendant 8, # [8] Defendant 9, # [9] Defendant 10, # [10] Defendant 11, # [11] Defendant 12, # [12] Defendant 13, # [13] Defendant 14, # [14] Defendant 15, # [15] Defendant 16, # [16] Defendant 17, # [17] Defendant 18, # [18] Defendant 19, # [19] Defendant 20, # [20] Defendant 21, # [21] Defendant 22, # [22] Defendant 23)(Bishop, Edward) (Entered: 01/09/2025) SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Shanghai Xingqi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Exhibit 2A (Attachments: # [1] Defendant 2, # [2] Defendant 3, # [3] Defendant 4, # [4] Defendant 5, # [5] Defendant 6, # [6] Defendant 7, # [7] Defendant 8, # [8] Defendant 9, # [9] Defendant 10, # [10] Defendant 11, # [11] Defendant 12, # [12] Defendant 13, # [13] Defendant 14, # [14] Defendant 15, # [15] Defendant 16, # [16] Defendant 17, # [17] Defendant 18, # [18] Defendant 19, # [19] Defendant 20, # [20] Defendant 21, # [21] Defendant 22, # [22] Defendant 23)(Bishop, Edward) (Entered: 01/09/2025)