Cooper & Dunham LLP

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases189

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

cooperdunham.com

Practice Areas

Mech Eng, ManufBiotechSemicond., Optic

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
08/28/24	Tristar Products Inc v. National Express Inc 2:13-CV-07752 ( D. NJ )	LETTER ORDER that Counsel shall appear in the Courtroom of the Undersigned on 10/9/2024 at 10:00 AM in Newark - Courtroom 2C. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 8/28/2024. (dam) (Entered: 08/28/2024)
08/28/24	Tristar Products Inc v. National Express Inc 2:13-CV-07752 ( D. NJ )	Letter from J. Brugh Lower to the Honorable Michael A. Hammer, U.S.M.J. re: availability for in-Court meet-and-confer. (LOWER, J.) (Entered: 08/28/2024)
08/15/24	Ragner Technology Corp v. Telebrands Corp 2:15-CV-08185 ( D. NJ )	Letter from David S. Stone, Esq. re: Adjourn or Cancel August 20, 2024 Conference re Set Hearings,,,. (STONE, DAVID) (Entered: 08/15/2024)
08/15/24	Telebrands Corp v. Ragner Technology Corp 2:15-CV-03163 ( D. NJ )	Letter from David S. Stone, Esq. re: Adjourn or Cancel August 20, 2024 Conference re Set Hearings,,,. (STONE, DAVID) (Entered: 08/15/2024)
04/25/22	Altair Instruments Inc v. WalMart Inc 2:20-CV-04367 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSALWITH PREJUDICE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez 164 . (yl) (Entered: 04/25/2022)
10/06/20	Au New Haven LLC v. YKK Corp 1:15-CV-03411 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER: The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs' motions at Dkt. Nos. 634 and 637. First, to clarify, as stated on the record during the September 21, 2020 conference, and as ordered by the Court at Dkt. Nos. 632 and 633, the parties w ere directed to confer regarding, and Plaintiffs were directed to submit to Defendants, the "very, very small number" of new deposition materials discussed during the September 21, 2020 conference by no later than September 30, 202 0. September 21, 2020 Hearing Tr. at 79:21-82:6; Dkt. Nos. 632, 633. This deadline did not affect the deadlines for the larger exchanges of the revised designations, counter-designations, objections, and joint chart described in th e Court's September 14, 2020 order. Dkt. No. 625. The schedule described in the Court's September 14, 2020 order remains in place. Furthermore, to the extent Defendants wish to respond to Plaintiffs' motions at Dkt. Nos. 634 and 637, those responses are due no later than October 19, 2020. Plaintiffs' replies, if any, are due no later than October 26, 2020. Furthermore, the Court intends that a jury trial in this matter will begin on May 17, 202 1 at 9:00 a.m. However, the parties should be aware that this trial date is subject to the Southern District of New York's jury trial schedule. The Court will hold a final pretrial conference in this case on April 23, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. Bo th the final pretrial conference and the jury trial will be held in Courtroom 12C of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse at 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 100 07. The parties are directed to submit revised versions of the following materials no later than April 2, 2021: (1) the joint pretrial order required under Rule 5 of the Court's Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases, and (2) a proposed brief, mutually acceptable description of the case, to be read to the venire. The parties are directed to limit their changes to those giving effect to the Court's July 30, 2020 summary judgment decision, Dkt. No. 6 11. The parties are further directed to submit a proposed brief, mutually acceptable overview of the applicable law, to be read to the jury as part of the Court's initial instructions prior to opening statements. ( Pretrial Order due b y 4/2/2021., Responses due by 10/19/2020, Replies due by 10/26/2020., Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/23/2021 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 12C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Gregory H. Woods., Jury Trial set for 5/17/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 12C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Gregory H. Woods.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 10/6/2020) (mro) ORDER: The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs' motions at Dkt. Nos. 634 and 637. First, to clarify, as stated on the record during the September 21, 2020 conference, and as ordered by the Court at Dkt. Nos. 632 and 633, the parties w ere directed to confer regarding, and Plaintiffs were directed to submit to Defendants, the "very, very small number" of new deposition materials discussed during the September 21, 2020 conference by no later than September 30, 202 0. September 21, 2020 Hearing Tr. at 79:21-82:6; Dkt. Nos. 632, 633. This deadline did not affect the deadlines for the larger exchanges of the revised designations, counter-designations, objections, and joint chart described in th e Court's September 14, 2020 order. Dkt. No. 625. The schedule described in the Court's September 14, 2020 order remains in place. Furthermore, to the extent Defendants wish to respond to Plaintiffs' motions at Dkt. Nos. 634 and 637, those responses are due no later than October 19, 2020. Plaintiffs' replies, if any, are due no later than October 26, 2020. Furthermore, the Court intends that a jury trial in this matter will begin on May 17, 202 1 at 9:00 a.m. However, the parties should be aware that this trial date is subject to the Southern District of New York's jury trial schedule. The Court will hold a final pretrial conference in this case on April 23, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. Bo th the final pretrial conference and the jury trial will be held in Courtroom 12C of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse at 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 100 07. The parties are directed to submit revised versions of the following materials no later than April 2, 2021: (1) the joint pretrial order required under Rule 5 of the Court's Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases, and (2) a proposed brief, mutually acceptable description of the case, to be read to the venire. The parties are directed to limit their changes to those giving effect to the Court's July 30, 2020 summary judgment decision, Dkt. No. 6 11. The parties are further directed to submit a proposed brief, mutually acceptable overview of the applicable law, to be read to the jury as part of the Court's initial instructions prior to opening statements. ( Pretrial Order due b y 4/2/2021., Responses due by 10/19/2020, Replies due by 10/26/2020., Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/23/2021 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 12C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Gregory H. Woods., Jury Trial set for 5/17/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 12C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Gregory H. Woods.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 10/6/2020) (mro)
12/16/19	Romag Fasteners Inc v. Fossil Inc 3:10-CV-01827 ( D. CT )	ORDER re 567 Joint Notice of Satisfaction of Judgment. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 12/16/19.(Tooker, A.) (Entered: 12/16/2019)
10/28/19	Telebrands Corp v. Altair Instruments Inc 2:18-CV-16234 ( D. NJ )	Remark: Case transferred from New Jersey has been opened in California Northern District as case 3:19-cv-06933, filed 10/24/2019. (gh, ) (Entered: 10/28/2019)
10/18/19	Altair Instruments Inc v. Telebrands Corp 2:19-CV-07452 ( D. NJ )	Case transferred from New Jersey has been opened in CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA as case 2:19-cv-08967, filed 10/17/2019.(eh, ) (Entered: 10/18/2019)
10/03/19	Altair Instruments Inc v. WalMart Inc 2:18-CV-09461 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 Order Dismissing Case) (gk) (Entered: 10/03/2019)