Weintraub Genshlea Chediak Sproul

California

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases52

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

weintraub-tobin

weintraub.com

Practice Areas

Mech Eng, ManufChemicalSemicond., Optic

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
11/20/24	Applied Optoelectronics Inc v. Eoptolink Technology USA Inc 5:24-CV-08165 ( N.D. CA )	Summons Issued as to Eoptolink Technology USA Inc.. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2024) (Entered: 11/20/2024)
11/20/24	Applied Optoelectronics Inc v. Eoptolink Technology USA Inc 5:24-CV-08165 ( N.D. CA )	Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/11/2025. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/18/2025 01:30 PM in San Jose, - Videoconference Only. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2024) (Entered: 11/20/2024)
11/20/24	Applied Optoelectronics Inc v. Eoptolink Technology USA Inc 5:24-CV-08165 ( N.D. CA )	Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/4/2024. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2024) (Entered: 11/20/2024) Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/4/2024. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2024) (Entered: 11/20/2024)
11/19/24	Applied Optoelectronics Inc v. Eoptolink Technology USA Inc 3:24-CV-08165 ( N.D. CA )	Proposed Summons. (Caligiuri, Eric) (Filed on 11/19/2024) (Entered: 11/19/2024)
11/19/24	Applied Optoelectronics Inc v. Eoptolink Technology USA Inc 3:24-CV-08165 ( N.D. CA )	Certificate of Interested Entities by Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. re [1] Complaint, (Caligiuri, Eric) (Filed on 11/19/2024) (Entered: 11/19/2024)
11/19/24	Applied Optoelectronics Inc v. Eoptolink Technology USA Inc 3:24-CV-08165 ( N.D. CA )	COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Eoptolink Technology USA Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-20065584.). Filed by Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.. (Attachments: # [1] Civil Cover Sheet)(Caligiuri, Eric) (Filed on 11/19/2024) (Entered: 11/19/2024)
11/04/24	Applied Optoelectronics Inc v. Cambridge Industries USA Inc 5:24-CV-01010 ( N.D. CA )	ORDER. The request of defendant CIG to dismiss the willful infringement claim, Dkt. No. 24, is denied. Whether reviewed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), or Rule 12(c), which does not appear to apply but was raised by CIG, the amended complaint plausibly alleges pre-lawsuit notice. See Dkt. No. 19 at 6-7. CIG's factual objections may be raised later on a fully developed record as warranted by the evidence. See Firstface Co. v. Apple, Inc., No. 18-cv-02245-JD, 2019 WL 1102374, at 2 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2019). Signed by Judge James Donato on 11/4/2024. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2024) (Entered: 11/04/2024) ORDER. The request of defendant CIG to dismiss the willful infringement claim, Dkt. No. 24, is denied. Whether reviewed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), or Rule 12(c), which does not appear to apply but was raised by CIG, the amended complaint plausibly alleges pre-lawsuit notice. See Dkt. No. 19 at 6-7. CIG's factual objections may be raised later on a fully developed record as warranted by the evidence. See Firstface Co. v. Apple, Inc., No. 18-cv-02245-JD, 2019 WL 1102374, at 2 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2019). Signed by Judge James Donato on 11/4/2024. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2024) (Entered: 11/04/2024)
11/04/24	Applied Optoelectronics Inc v. Cambridge Industries USA Inc 3:24-CV-01010 ( N.D. CA )	ORDER. The request of defendant CIG to dismiss the willful infringement claim, Dkt. No. 24, is denied. Whether reviewed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), or Rule 12(c), which does not appear to apply but was raised by CIG, the amended complaint plausibly alleges pre-lawsuit notice. See Dkt. No. 19 at 6-7. CIG's factual objections may be raised later on a fully developed record as warranted by the evidence. See Firstface Co. v. Apple, Inc., No. 18-cv-02245-JD, 2019 WL 1102374, at 2 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2019). Signed by Judge James Donato on 11/4/2024. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2024) (Entered: 11/04/2024) ORDER. The request of defendant CIG to dismiss the willful infringement claim, Dkt. No. 24, is denied. Whether reviewed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), or Rule 12(c), which does not appear to apply but was raised by CIG, the amended complaint plausibly alleges pre-lawsuit notice. See Dkt. No. 19 at 6-7. CIG's factual objections may be raised later on a fully developed record as warranted by the evidence. See Firstface Co. v. Apple, Inc., No. 18-cv-02245-JD, 2019 WL 1102374, at 2 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2019). Signed by Judge James Donato on 11/4/2024. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2024) (Entered: 11/04/2024)
06/05/24	Applied Optoelectronics Inc v. Molex LLC 4:23-CV-04787 ( N.D. CA )	JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO REOPEN CASE FOR 15 DAYS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO REOPEN CASE; ORDER by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting 42 Stipulation. (kc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2024) (Entered: 06/05/2024)
03/09/23	Creekview IP LLC v. Hypercel Corp 2:22-CV-07908 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 Order) (aco) (Entered: 03/09/2023)