Rutan & Tucker LLP

California

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases159

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

rutan-tucker

rutan.com

Practice Areas

Mech Eng, ManufSemicond., OpticCommunications

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
12/10/24	TD Professional Services v. Truyo Inc 2:22-CV-00018 ( D. AZ )	Copy of AO 120 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Patent or Trademark emailed to Patent and Trademark Office on this date. (REK) (Entered: 12/10/2024)
12/02/24	Maxx Group LLC v. Uriah Products LLC 8:24-CV-01651 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES ORDER DENYING AS MOOT Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [18] by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: In this case, Defendant Forcome may be properly dismissed under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) because Defendant Forcome has not filed an answer or moved for summary judgment. Because Plaintiff's Notice of Dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) automatically terminated the action as to Defendant Forcome, Defendant Forcome's Motion, (Dkt. 18), is DENIED AS MOOT. The court also VACATES the 12/19/2024, hearing associated with the Motion. (jp) (Entered: 12/02/2024) MINUTES ORDER DENYING AS MOOT Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [18] by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: In this case, Defendant Forcome may be properly dismissed under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) because Defendant Forcome has not filed an answer or moved for summary judgment. Because Plaintiff's Notice of Dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) automatically terminated the action as to Defendant Forcome, Defendant Forcome's Motion, (Dkt. 18), is DENIED AS MOOT. The court also VACATES the 12/19/2024, hearing associated with the Motion. (jp) (Entered: 12/02/2024)
10/01/24	Avation Medical Inc v. Emkinetics Inc 4:24-CV-01702 ( N.D. CA )	ORDER APPROVING JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY PENDING PTAB REVIEW PROCEEDINGS OF CHALLENGED PATENTS by Judge Jon S. Tigar re [32] STIPULATION. Joint Case Management Statement due by 4/22/2025. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/29/2025 at 02:00 PM - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at [https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jst ]Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. One list of names of all counsel appearing for all parties must be sent in one email to the CRD at jstcrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 04/28/2025 at 2:00PM PST.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: [https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/]. (dms, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2024) (Entered: 10/01/2024) ORDER APPROVING JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY PENDING PTAB REVIEW PROCEEDINGS OF CHALLENGED PATENTS by Judge Jon S. Tigar re [32] STIPULATION. Joint Case Management Statement due by 4/22/2025. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/29/2025 at 02:00 PM - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at [https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jst ]Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. One list of names of all counsel appearing for all parties must be sent in one email to the CRD at jstcrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 04/28/2025 at 2:00PM PST.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: [https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/]. (dms, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2024) (Entered: 10/01/2024)
08/27/24	Driscoll's Inc v. California Berry Cultivars LLC 2:19-CV-00493 ( E.D. CA )	SEALED EVENT (Attachments: # 1 Part 2, # 2 Part 3, # 3 Part 4) (Mendez Licea, O) (Entered: 08/27/2024)
08/27/24	Driscoll's Inc v. California Berry Cultivars LLC 2:19-CV-00493 ( E.D. CA )	ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/26/2024 GRANTING 136 Request to Seal. (Mendez Licea, O) (Entered: 08/27/2024)
10/30/23	Diode Dynamics LLC v. 5dlight Inc 5:23-CV-02238 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Diode Dynamics, L.L.C.. (Oines, Ronald) (Entered: 10/30/2023)
10/30/23	Diode Dynamics LLC v. 5dlight Inc 5:23-CV-02238 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Diode Dynamics, L.L.C., identifying Diode Dynamics, L.L.C., 5DLight, Inc., d/b/a Lasfit. (Oines, Ronald) (Entered: 10/30/2023)
10/30/23	Diode Dynamics LLC v. 5dlight Inc 5:23-CV-02238 ( C.D. CA )	CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Diode Dynamics, L.L.C.. (Oines, Ronald) (Entered: 10/30/2023)
10/30/23	Diode Dynamics LLC v. 5dlight Inc 5:23-CV-02238 ( C.D. CA )	Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Plaintiff Diode Dynamics, L.L.C.. (Oines, Ronald) (Entered: 10/30/2023)
10/30/23	Diode Dynamics LLC v. 5dlight Inc 5:23-CV-02238 ( C.D. CA )	COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36319446 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Diode Dynamics, L.L.C.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12) (Attorney Ronald P. Oines added to party Diode Dynamics, L.L.C.(pty:pla))(Oines, Ronald) (Entered: 10/30/2023) COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36319446 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Diode Dynamics, L.L.C.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12) (Attorney Ronald P. Oines added to party Diode Dynamics, L.L.C.(pty:pla))(Oines, Ronald) (Entered: 10/30/2023)