Dilworth Paxson LLP

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases73

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

dilworth-paxson

dilworthlaw.com

Practice Areas

BiotechCommunicationsComp. Arch. and Software

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
10/28/22	Cardionet Inc v. Scottcare Corp 2:12-CV-02516 ( E.D. PA )	STIPULATION of Dismissal Pursuant to FRCP (a)(1)(A)(ii) by BRAEMAR MANUFACTURING, LLC, CARDIONET, INC., CARDIONET, LLC. (RODGERS, JAMES) (Entered: 10/28/2022)
07/25/22	Infinity Computer Products Inc v. Canon USA Inc 2:18-CV-01823 ( E.D. NY )	Joint Stipulation of Agreed Judgment and Dismissal. So Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 7/23/2022. (Piper, Francine) (Entered: 07/25/2022)
04/29/20	Infinity Computer Products Inc v. Canon USA Inc 2:18-CV-01823 ( E.D. NY )	Final Civil Docket 07-25-2022
03/31/22	Infinity Computer Products Inc v. Lexmark Intl Inc 5:18-CV-00198 ( E.D. KY )	REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding re 186 Judgment, cc: form e-mailed to Register. (JLM) (Entered: 03/31/2022)
03/31/22	Infinity Computer Products Inc v. Lexmark Intl Inc 5:18-CV-00198 ( E.D. KY )	AGREED JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL: Judgment of non- infringement and invalidity is entered in Lexmark's favor on (i) Counts 14 of Infinity's Severed Complaint for alleged infringement of the Patents, ECF No. 1 , and (ii) Count 2 of Lexmark's Counterclaim for invalidity of the Patents, ECF No. 21 . 2. Additionally, Counts 1 and 3 of Lexmark's Counterclaim for non-infringement and unenforceability are dismissed without prejudice. ECF No. 21 . 3. Infinity reserves any and all rights under any retroactive statutory or common-law changes to the patent laws of the United States. See Landgraf v. USI Film Products, 511 U.S. 244, 265, 268 (1994), and any other legally viable cause of action. 4. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. 5. All pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 3/31/22.(JLM)cc: COR (Entered: 03/31/2022) AGREED JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL: Judgment of non- infringement and invalidity is entered in Lexmark's favor on (i) Counts 14 of Infinity's Severed Complaint for alleged infringement of the Patents, ECF No. 1 , and (ii) Count 2 of Lexmark's Counterclaim for invalidity of the Patents, ECF No. 21 . 2. Additionally, Counts 1 and 3 of Lexmark's Counterclaim for non-infringement and unenforceability are dismissed without prejudice. ECF No. 21 . 3. Infinity reserves any and all rights under any retroactive statutory or common-law changes to the patent laws of the United States. See Landgraf v. USI Film Products, 511 U.S. 244, 265, 268 (1994), and any other legally viable cause of action. 4. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. 5. All pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 3/31/22.(JLM)cc: COR (Entered: 03/31/2022)
01/14/20	Infinity Computer Products Inc v. Lexmark Intl Inc 5:18-CV-00198 ( E.D. KY )	Final Civil Docket 03-31-2022
03/07/22	MCS Industries Inc v. Aldi Inc 5:21-CV-03828 ( E.D. PA )	ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41.1(b). SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 3/7/22. 3/7/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(bac) (Entered: 03/07/2022)
09/10/21	MCS Industries Inc v. Aldi Inc 5:21-CV-03828 ( E.D. PA )	Final Civil Docket 03-07-2022
03/12/21	Keynetik Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 2:17-CV-02794 ( D. NJ )	STATUS REPORT by All Plaintiffs. (BEHM, EDWARD) (Entered: 03/12/2021)
	Infinity Computer Products Inc v. Oki Data Americas Inc 1:18-CV-00463 ( D. DE )	JUDGMENT of USCA as to [191] Notice of Appeal (Federal Circuit) filed by Infinity Computer Products Inc. Decision of USCA: AFFIRMED. (Attachment: # [1] Opinion)(ntl)