Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases313

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

bradley-law

bradley.com

Practice Areas

CommunicationsComp. Arch. and SoftwareTransport., E-Comm.

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
10/28/24	Blue Yonder Group Inc v. Kinaxis Inc 3:20-CV-03636 ( N.D. TX )	MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - THE COURT'S RULINGS ON THE SEALING MOTIONS.The Court: GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Kinaxis's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Kinaxis's Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions of Sarah Butler and Shelly Irvine, Doc. No. 282; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 284; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Kinaxis's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Kinaxis' s Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. No. 285; DENIES Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 287;DENIES Kinaxis's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Kinaxis's Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions of James Pooley, Doc. No. 290;GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 292; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 294; DENIES Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 287;DENIES Kinaxis's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Kinaxis's Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions of James Pooley, Doc. No. 290; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 292; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 294; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 310; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Kinaxis's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Kinaxis's Opposition to Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion to strike Untimely Disclosed Trade Secrets and Exclude Expert Opinions of Dr. Thomas P. McGahee, Doc. No. 312; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Kinaxis's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Kinaxis's Brief in Support of Its Opposition to Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Rule 702 Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions of Dr. Nisha Mody, Doc. No. 315; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Kinaxis's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Kinaxis's Response to Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Doc. No. 323; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc's Unopposed Motion to Seal, Doc. No. 325; DENIES Kinaxis's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Kinaxis's Reply to its Motion to Compel, Doc. No. 327; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 335; DENIES Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 337; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 339; DENIES Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Kinaxis's Sur-Reply to Plaintiff's Combined Reply to Kinaxis's Responses (Dkt. 343), Doc. No. 349; DENIES Kinaxis's Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply to Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Combined Reply to Defendants Responses (Dkt. 343), Doc. No. 350; and DENIES Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Defendants Rely to Plaintiff's Combined Response to Motion for Leave to File Under Seal (Dkt. 347), Doc. No. 353. FILING OF SEALED, UNSEALED, and REDACTED DOCUMENTS. For each of the Sealing Motions, the party who filed a particular sealing motion shall be responsible for filing the underlying motion, response, reply, or other documents to which the Sealing Motion pertains in strict accordance with this Order. For Sealing Motions that the Court has DENIED, the party who filed the Sealing Motion shall, within 28 days of the date of this Order, file an unsealed and unredacted version of the document to which the Sealing Motion pertains. For Sealing Motions that the Court has GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, the party who filed the Sealing Motion shall, within 28 days of the date of this Order, file an unsealed and publicly redacted version of the document to which the Sealing Motion pertains. If the Court has authorized the sealing of a document in its entirety, then the party who filed the Sealing Motion shall file a sealed and unredacted version of the document to which the Sealing Motion pertains. Prior to the filing of either unsealed and publicly redacted documents or unredacted and sealed documents in response to this Order, the responsible party shall produce and deliver to the other party all its proposed filings under this Order. Such productions shall be made within 14 days of the date of this Order. Thereafter, within 21 days of the date of this Order, the parties shall meet and confer for the purpose of determining if the proposed filings are correctly designated as documents to be filed under seal or not and for the purpose of ensuring the correct redaction of the documents which the Court has partially sealed, all in accordance of the Courts Order herein. All filings made in response to the Courts Order herein shall include a certificate of conference indicating that the parties have conferred regarding the filing, the date the parties conferred, which attorneys participated, and that the parties jointly agree and represent to the Court that the documents are being filed in accordance with the Court's Order. All documents filed the parties in response to this Order shall be deemed timely filed if such documents are filed within the time frame Ordered herein. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 10/28/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 10/28/2024) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - THE COURT'S RULINGS ON THE SEALING MOTIONS.The Court: GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Kinaxis's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Kinaxis's Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions of Sarah Butler and Shelly Irvine, Doc. No. 282; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 284; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Kinaxis's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Kinaxis' s Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. No. 285; DENIES Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 287;DENIES Kinaxis's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Kinaxis's Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions of James Pooley, Doc. No. 290;GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 292; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 294; DENIES Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 287;DENIES Kinaxis's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Kinaxis's Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions of James Pooley, Doc. No. 290; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 292; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 294; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 310; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Kinaxis's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Kinaxis's Opposition to Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion to strike Untimely Disclosed Trade Secrets and Exclude Expert Opinions of Dr. Thomas P. McGahee, Doc. No. 312; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Kinaxis's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Kinaxis's Brief in Support of Its Opposition to Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Rule 702 Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions of Dr. Nisha Mody, Doc. No. 315; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Kinaxis's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Kinaxis's Response to Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Doc. No. 323; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc's Unopposed Motion to Seal, Doc. No. 325; DENIES Kinaxis's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Kinaxis's Reply to its Motion to Compel, Doc. No. 327; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 335; DENIES Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 337; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, Doc. No. 339; DENIES Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Kinaxis's Sur-Reply to Plaintiff's Combined Reply to Kinaxis's Responses (Dkt. 343), Doc. No. 349; DENIES Kinaxis's Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply to Plaintiff Blue Yonder Group, Inc.'s Combined Reply to Defendants Responses (Dkt. 343), Doc. No. 350; and DENIES Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Defendants Rely to Plaintiff's Combined Response to Motion for Leave to File Under Seal (Dkt. 347), Doc. No. 353. FILING OF SEALED, UNSEALED, and REDACTED DOCUMENTS. For each of the Sealing Motions, the party who filed a particular sealing motion shall be responsible for filing the underlying motion, response, reply, or other documents to which the Sealing Motion pertains in strict accordance with this Order. For Sealing Motions that the Court has DENIED, the party who filed the Sealing Motion shall, within 28 days of the date of this Order, file an unsealed and unredacted version of the document to which the Sealing Motion pertains. For Sealing Motions that the Court has GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, the party who filed the Sealing Motion shall, within 28 days of the date of this Order, file an unsealed and publicly redacted version of the document to which the Sealing Motion pertains. If the Court has authorized the sealing of a document in its entirety, then the party who filed the Sealing Motion shall file a sealed and unredacted version of the document to which the Sealing Motion pertains. Prior to the filing of either unsealed and publicly redacted documents or unredacted and sealed documents in response to this Order, the responsible party shall produce and deliver to the other party all its proposed filings under this Order. Such productions shall be made within 14 days of the date of this Order. Thereafter, within 21 days of the date of this Order, the parties shall meet and confer for the purpose of determining if the proposed filings are correctly designated as documents to be filed under seal or not and for the purpose of ensuring the correct redaction of the documents which the Court has partially sealed, all in accordance of the Courts Order herein. All filings made in response to the Courts Order herein shall include a certificate of conference indicating that the parties have conferred regarding the filing, the date the parties conferred, which attorneys participated, and that the parties jointly agree and represent to the Court that the documents are being filed in accordance with the Court's Order. All documents filed the parties in response to this Order shall be deemed timely filed if such documents are filed within the time frame Ordered herein. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 10/28/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 10/28/2024)
10/21/24	Tethrd LLC v. Cruzr Saddles LLC 1:24-CV-00076 ( M.D. TN )	ORDER: [24] MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to [22] MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED. Responses due by 10/28/2024. Signed by Chief Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 10/21/2024. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc) (Entered: 10/21/2024)
10/01/24	Signify North America Corp v. Menard Inc 3:22-CV-00706 ( W.D. WI )	ORDER that1. Defendants' motion to stay this case pending the result of the inter parties review instituted by the USPTO on September 9, 2024, Dkt. [343] , is GRANTED, subject to the conditions stated above.2. The pending motions for summary judgment. Dkt. [299] , Dkt. [301] , and motions to strike, Dkt. [295] , Dkt. [322] , are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, subject torebriefing after the conclusion of inter partes review. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/1/2024. (voc) (Entered: 10/01/2024) ORDER that1. Defendants' motion to stay this case pending the result of the inter parties review instituted by the USPTO on September 9, 2024, Dkt. [343] , is GRANTED, subject to the conditions stated above.2. The pending motions for summary judgment. Dkt. [299] , Dkt. [301] , and motions to strike, Dkt. [295] , Dkt. [322] , are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, subject torebriefing after the conclusion of inter partes review. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/1/2024. (voc) (Entered: 10/01/2024)
08/26/24	TQ Delta LLC v. ADTRAN Inc 1:14-CV-00954 ( D. DE )	SO ORDERED Granting 1527 Stipulation of Dismissal (***Civil Case Terminated). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/26/2024. (nms) (Entered: 08/26/2024)
08/26/24	TQ Delta LLC v. ADTRAN Inc 1:14-CV-00954 ( D. DE )	SO ORDERED Granting 1527 Stipulation of Dismissal (***Civil Case Terminated). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/26/2024. (nms) (Entered: 08/26/2024)
08/26/24	TQ Delta LLC v. ADTRAN Inc 1:14-CV-00954 ( D. DE )	STIPULATION of Dismissal by TQ Delta LLC. (Farnan, Brian) (Entered: 08/26/2024)
08/26/24	TQ Delta LLC v. ADTRAN Inc 1:14-CV-00954 ( D. DE )	STIPULATION of Dismissal by TQ Delta LLC. (Farnan, Brian) (Entered: 08/26/2024)
08/23/24	Millennium Outdoors LLC v. Leader Accessories LLC 3:23-CV-00106 ( W.D. WI )	TEXT ONLY ORDER ORDER granting [38] Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time File Joint Status Report by an Additional Two Weeks. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anita M. Boor on 8/23/2024. (voc) (Entered: 08/23/2024)
08/23/24	Millennium Outdoors LLC v. Leader Accessories LLC 3:23-CV-00106 ( W.D. WI )	TEXT ONLY ORDER ORDER granting 38 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time File Joint Status Report by an Additional Two Weeks. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anita M. Boor on 8/23/2024. (voc) (Entered: 08/23/2024)
08/23/24	Millennium Outdoors LLC v. Leader Accessories LLC 3:23-CV-00106 ( W.D. WI )	Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Joint Status Report by an Additional Two Weeks by Plaintiff Millennium Outdoors, LLC. (Gregor, Jennifer) Modified on 8/23/2024. (lak) (Entered: 08/23/2024)