Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases42

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

carter-ledyard

clm.com

Practice Areas

BiotechMech Eng, ManufSemicond., Optic

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
12/20/24	Kaneka Corp v. Designs for Health Inc 1:21-CV-00209 ( D. DE )	ORAL ORDER: The court has issued findings of fact and conclusions of law finding that the defendants are liable for infringing a valid patent owned by the plaintiff. The court will therefore need to schedule further proceedings on the issue of damages and any other relief to which the plaintiff may be entitled. The parties are directed to meet and confer to propose scheduling for the remedies phase of the case, including possible dates for the trial on remedies. By December 30, 2024, the parties are directed to submit a proposed scheduling order for the further proceedings in this case. With respect to the trial date, the parties are directed to submit a list of three possible weeks during which the remedies trial can be held. The parties' proposed weeks for trial should be prior to December 1, 2025. The weeks should not include the first full week of any month, which is when I sit in the court of appeals. The date should also not include any week in September 2025. The parties should also propose the number of hours that they believe the court should set aside for each party's presentation of its case on the issue of remedy. Ordered by Judge William C. Bryson on 12/20/2024. (mpb) (Entered: 12/20/2024) ORAL ORDER: The court has issued findings of fact and conclusions of law finding that the defendants are liable for infringing a valid patent owned by the plaintiff. The court will therefore need to schedule further proceedings on the issue of damages and any other relief to which the plaintiff may be entitled. The parties are directed to meet and confer to propose scheduling for the remedies phase of the case, including possible dates for the trial on remedies. By December 30, 2024, the parties are directed to submit a proposed scheduling order for the further proceedings in this case. With respect to the trial date, the parties are directed to submit a list of three possible weeks during which the remedies trial can be held. The parties' proposed weeks for trial should be prior to December 1, 2025. The weeks should not include the first full week of any month, which is when I sit in the court of appeals. The date should also not include any week in September 2025. The parties should also propose the number of hours that they believe the court should set aside for each party's presentation of its case on the issue of remedy. Ordered by Judge William C. Bryson on 12/20/2024. (mpb) (Entered: 12/20/2024)
12/20/24	Kaneka Corp v. Designs for Health Inc 1:21-CV-00209 ( D. DE )	FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Signed by Judge William C. Bryson on 12/20/2024. (mpb) (Entered: 12/20/2024)
09/26/24	Facet Technologies LLC v. LifeScan Inc 2:22-CV-01717 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (lc) (Entered: 09/26/2024)
09/26/24	Facet Technologies LLC v. LifeScan Inc 2:22-CV-01717 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER STAYING CASE AND TERMINATING ALL PENDING MOTIONS AND APPLICATIONS [426] , [427] , [428] , [429] , [430] , [432] , [437] , [439] , [440] , [441] , [442] , [443] , [447] , [462] , [469] (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILED SPECIFIC DISCUSSION HEREIN). The Court stays the case until 30 days after the final written decision becomes final and nonappealable or until the appeal of the final written decision concludes, whichever is later. For case administration purposes only, the Court directs the Clerk to terminate all pending motions, vacate the case schedule, and remove the case from the Court's active caseload until further application by the parties or order of this Court. The parties shall file a joint status report within 120 days, and a further report every 120 days thereafter. Each report must state on the cover page the date the next report is due. Additionally, the parties must notify the Court within seven days of the conclusion of the appeal.(Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) (Entered: 09/26/2024) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER STAYING CASE AND TERMINATING ALL PENDING MOTIONS AND APPLICATIONS [426] , [427] , [428] , [429] , [430] , [432] , [437] , [439] , [440] , [441] , [442] , [443] , [447] , [462] , [469] (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILED SPECIFIC DISCUSSION HEREIN). The Court stays the case until 30 days after the final written decision becomes final and nonappealable or until the appeal of the final written decision concludes, whichever is later. For case administration purposes only, the Court directs the Clerk to terminate all pending motions, vacate the case schedule, and remove the case from the Court's active caseload until further application by the parties or order of this Court. The parties shall file a joint status report within 120 days, and a further report every 120 days thereafter. Each report must state on the cover page the date the next report is due. Additionally, the parties must notify the Court within seven days of the conclusion of the appeal.(Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) (Entered: 09/26/2024)
10/05/23	Kaneka Corp v. Cocrystal Technology Jiaxing Co Ltd 1:23-CV-07483 ( E.D. NY )	COMPLAINT against Cocrystal Health Industry (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd., Cocrystal Technology (Jiaxing) Co., Ltd. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17155853 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes, filed by Kaneka Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - US7829080, # 2 Exhibit B - Specification of July 2022 Cocrystal Ubiquinol to Tishcon, # 3 Exhibit C - Analysis of July 2022 Ubiquinol from Cocrystal to Tishcon, # 4 Exhibit D - Innovative Ingredients Coenzyme QH Slide Deck, # 5 Exhibit E - Kaneka Test of Cocrystal Ubiquinol Oct 2022, # 6 Exhibit F - Cocrystal Actives Brochure, # 7 Exhibit G - CoCrystal Letter of Indemnity, # 8 Exhibit H - Crystal QH Results, # 9 Exhibit I - NutraIngredients Advertisement, # 10 Civil Cover Sheet, # 11 Proposed Summons) (Griffin, Gerald) (Entered: 10/05/2023) COMPLAINT against Cocrystal Health Industry (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd., Cocrystal Technology (Jiaxing) Co., Ltd. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17155853 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes, filed by Kaneka Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - US7829080, # 2 Exhibit B - Specification of July 2022 Cocrystal Ubiquinol to Tishcon, # 3 Exhibit C - Analysis of July 2022 Ubiquinol from Cocrystal to Tishcon, # 4 Exhibit D - Innovative Ingredients Coenzyme QH Slide Deck, # 5 Exhibit E - Kaneka Test of Cocrystal Ubiquinol Oct 2022, # 6 Exhibit F - Cocrystal Actives Brochure, # 7 Exhibit G - CoCrystal Letter of Indemnity, # 8 Exhibit H - Crystal QH Results, # 9 Exhibit I - NutraIngredients Advertisement, # 10 Civil Cover Sheet, # 11 Proposed Summons) (Griffin, Gerald) (Entered: 10/05/2023)
03/23/21	Securenet Solutions Group LLC v. Senstar Corp 1:19-CV-02913 ( D. CO )	Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 23 March 2021. It is hereby ORDERED the parties` Stipulated Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice (Dkt. # 96 ) is GRANTED. All claims in this action are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys` fees. PLEASE READ ATTACHED MINUTE ORDER. (cmadr, ) (Entered: 03/23/2021)
03/23/21	Securenet Solutions Group LLC v. Senstar Corp 1:19-CV-02913 ( D. CO )	Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss all claims with prejudice by Defendant Senstar Corporation. (Griem, John) (Entered: 03/23/2021)
03/23/21	Securenet Solutions Group LLC v. Senstar Corp 1:19-CV-02913 ( D. CO )	Final Civil Docket 03-23-2021
08/09/19	Hair Flair Ltd v. WalMart Inc 1:18-CV-05841 ( E.D. NY )	ORDER granting 36 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. So Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 8/9/2019. (Lanci, Michael) (Entered: 08/09/2019)
12/17/18	Hair Flair Ltd v. WalMart Inc 1:18-CV-05841 ( E.D. NY )	NOTICE of Appearance by Sherman W Kahn on behalf of Walmart Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Kahn, Sherman) (Entered: 12/17/2018)